Thomas Morley writes:
> Or with other words, the rhythm is wrong in the line labeled with %% <==
>
> controlDivisi = {
> \switchOn
> s4 s s s
> \switchOff
> s %% <==
> \switchOn
> s1
> }
>
> And I'm blind ... at least today.
It's more like that I'm better at answering "how would
2018-08-09 0:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2018-08-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>>
>>>
>>> Well, this whole post was meant to explain my thoughts while coding
>>> the example from my previous mail.
>>> I expected the code to fail like my previous.
>>> It doesn't.
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2018-08-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>
>>
>> Well, this whole post was meant to explain my thoughts while coding
>> the example from my previous mail.
>> I expected the code to fail like my previous.
>> It doesn't.
>> Though, even after your hints above, what's the
2018-08-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>
> Well, this whole post was meant to explain my thoughts while coding
> the example from my previous mail.
> I expected the code to fail like my previous.
> It doesn't.
> Though, even after your hints above, what's the essential difference?
>
> I'll
2018-08-08 15:25 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2018-08-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
2018-08-07 20:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>>> Ok, let me chime in: I've basically developed some of the
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2018-08-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> 2018-08-07 20:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
>> Ok, let me chime in: I've basically developed some of the low-level
>> mechanisms for divisi staves.
>
2018-08-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2018-08-07 20:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
> Ok, let me chime in: I've basically developed some of the low-level
> mechanisms for divisi staves.
You mean that 'make-dead-when
Super glad to see this conversation happening! David I'm so glad you've
been working on the backend for divisi. Divisi staves have long been my
biggest headache.
Thomas, thanks for writing the improved version. I haven't had a chance to
look at the code deeply yet — I will play around with it
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2018-08-07 20:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>
Ok, let me chime in: I've basically developed some of the low-level
mechanisms for divisi staves.
>>>
>>> You mean that 'make-dead-when stuff?
>>
>> Well, that's the internal part of the low
2018-08-07 20:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>>> Ok, let me chime in: I've basically developed some of the low-level
>>> mechanisms for divisi staves.
>>
>> You mean that 'make-dead-when stuff?
>
> Well, that's the internal part of the low end. But it's usually driven
> by
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2018-08-07 19:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> 2018-08-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
Attached an improved and
2018-08-07 19:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2018-08-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>>> 2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>>>
Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
>>>
>>> Attached an improved and simplified version.
>>> It's tested with
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2018-08-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>> 2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>>
>>> Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
>>
>> Attached an improved and simplified version.
>> It's tested with 2/3/4-voices divisi, all in one score.
>> Although not
2018-08-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>
>> Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
>
> Attached an improved and simplified version.
> It's tested with 2/3/4-voices divisi, all in one score.
> Although not tested, I see no reason why it
2018-08-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>
>> Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
>
> Attached an improved and simplified version.
> It's tested with 2/3/4-voices divisi, all in one score.
> Although not tested, I see no reason why it
2018-08-05 18:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> Inspired by your work I come up with the attached.
Attached an improved and simplified version.
It's tested with 2/3/4-voices divisi, all in one score.
Although not tested, I see no reason why it shouldn't work with even
more voices.
HTH,
Harm
2018-08-03 23:14 GMT+02:00 Saul Tobin :
> Hi all,
>
> I just put together a snippet to make managing shared wind staves more
> automatic, particularly with triple winds that may be combined in different
> ways.
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> #(define remove-if-sibling
>(lambda (offsets)
>
Those errors are from this expression in the three staff example: <<
\global \I \II \III >>. Lilypond is implicitly creating three Voices
instead of treating it as a single Voice with simultaneous music. If you
replace that expression with { <> << \global \I \II \III >> }, the errors
go away.
On 8/3/2018 5:14 PM, Saul Tobin wrote:
Hi all,
I just put together a snippet to make managing shared wind staves more
automatic, particularly with triple winds that may be combined in
different ways.
\version "2.19.82"
#(define remove-if-sibling
(lambda (offsets)
(lambda (grob)
Hi all,
I just put together a snippet to make managing shared wind staves more
automatic, particularly with triple winds that may be combined in different
ways.
\version "2.19.82"
#(define remove-if-sibling
(lambda (offsets)
(lambda (grob)
(let* (
;; The parent of
20 matches
Mail list logo
