Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.02.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Robert Blackstone: > Hi Urs, > Thanks for your explanation and advice (and my apologies for my late > reaction. Some urgent matter temporarily took me off my engraving activity.) > So I still have to try out your suggestion. > > I am still puzzled though, for

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Robert Blackstone
Hi Urs, Thanks for your explanation and advice (and my apologies for my late reaction. Some urgent matter temporarily took me off my engraving activity.) So I still have to try out your suggestion. I am still puzzled though, for while I can understand that different voices cannot be connected

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 14 Feb 2017, at 15:34, Urs Liska wrote: > Well, the ef4 in the first bar is in the *lower* voice while the ones in the > second bar are in the *upper* voice. In order to tie these notes both have to > be in the upper voice. I was able to fix it using this

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 14 Feb 2017, at 15:34, Urs Liska wrote: >> I have similar problem in the code below, wanting the last note ef4 of the >> first measure to be tied to the one in the following measure. I could not >> make your suggestion work. > > Well, the ef4 in the first bar is in

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.02.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Hans Åberg: > >> On 14 Feb 2017, at 14:37, Urs Liska > > wrote: > >> The actual problem is that the notes are encapsulated in different Voice >> expressions and therefore can't be connected by spanners such as

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 14 Feb 2017, at 14:37, Urs Liska wrote: > The actual problem is that the notes are encapsulated in different Voice > expressions and therefore can't be connected by spanners such as slurs > or \< \! etc. > > When you write > c' << { d'' } // { d' } >> c' > LilyPond

Re: A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.02.2017 um 14:27 schrieb Robert Blackstone: > Dear all, > > I have been struggling for many hours with a pianoscore in which the mostly > polyphonic text regularly switches between the treble staff and the bass > staff. > There should be (phrasing-) slurs joining the beamed groups of

A staff change and phrasing slur problem

2017-02-14 Thread Robert Blackstone
Dear all, I have been struggling for many hours with a pianoscore in which the mostly polyphonic text regularly switches between the treble staff and the bass staff. There should be (phrasing-) slurs joining the beamed groups of notes. Sometimes these slurs do not appear, as in the upper voice

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: > Probably GCC6. What does ldd /usr/bin/lilypond state? >>> >>> See attachment. >> >> Huh. The library version numbers (including C++ library as far as I can >> tell) seem to match those of my

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: Probably GCC6. What does ldd /usr/bin/lilypond state? See attachment. Huh. The library version numbers (including C++ library as far as I can tell) seem to match those of my system pretty closely. Can you run this under the debugger and get a

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Martin Tarenskeen writes: > >>> Linux Fedora 24 > >> Probably GCC6. What does ldd /usr/bin/lilypond state? > > See attachment. Huh. The library version numbers (including

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: Martin Tarenskeen writes: Linux Fedora 24 Probably GCC6. What does ldd /usr/bin/lilypond state? See attachment. -- Martin linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffe254be000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Martin Tarenskeen writes: > >>> But this gives me a "Segfault" error >>> >>> \version "2.19.44" >>> \relative { >>> c''8( d e f~ f2~ | f8) f e d c2 | >>> } >>> >>> >>>

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, David Kastrup wrote: Martin Tarenskeen writes: But this gives me a "Segfault" error \version "2.19.44" \relative { c''8( d e f~ f2~ | f8) f e d c2 | } What's wrong here ? You don't specify operating system, architecture, LilyPond binary

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread Thomas Scharkowski
Original-Nachricht Hi, This works fine: \version "2.19.44" \relative { c''8( d e) f~ f2~ | f8 f e d c2 | } But this gives me a "Segfault" error \version "2.19.44" \relative { c''8( d e f~ f2~ | f8) f e d c2 | } What's wrong here ? Both are fine here (Mac OS X

Re: another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > Hi, > > This works fine: > > \version "2.19.44" > \relative { > c''8( d e) f~ f2~ | f8 f e d c2 | } > > But this gives me a "Segfault" error > > \version "2.19.44" > \relative { > c''8( d e f~ f2~ | f8) f e d c2 | > } > > > What's wrong

another slur problem

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
Hi, This works fine: \version "2.19.44" \relative { c''8( d e) f~ f2~ | f8 f e d c2 | } But this gives me a "Segfault" error \version "2.19.44" \relative { c''8( d e f~ f2~ | f8) f e d c2 | } What's wrong here ? -- Martin ___

Re: tie and slur problem

2014-10-30 Thread Rutger Hofman
On 10/28/2014 09:42 AM, Dr. Bernhard Kleine wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There should be a tie between the two c and a slur from e to f. and a slur from g over b(bes) to a in the right hand. The upper g and b and a are in a separate voice and no problem. But how to

Re: tie and slur problem

2014-10-28 Thread Urs Liska
Am 28.10.2014 09:42, schrieb Dr. Bernhard Kleine: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There should be a tie between the two c and a slur from e to f. and a slur from g over b(bes) to a in the right hand. The upper g and b and a are in a separate voice and no problem. But how to

Re:tie and slur problem

2014-10-28 Thread Stephen MacNeil
Good pint Urs however that only works for outside notes, also I wanted the direction to be opposite the stem as in traditional classical guitar. So it doesn't work. also what happens when the slur is to a note in the middle? as in the examples I just sent. here is a quick example

Re:tie and slur problem

2014-10-28 Thread Stephen MacNeil
Sorry Urs I thought that was to me as the tittle is similar. my apologies ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re:tie and slur problem

2014-10-28 Thread tisimst
/Re-tie-and-slur-problem-tp168037.html To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-tie-and-slur-problem-tp168037p168039.html Sent from

Re: tie and slur problem

2014-10-28 Thread Rutger Hofman
The following code works for me. It depends on two voices having the same predicate \voiceTwo. Note that you will probably want to tune the shape of the voiceTwo slur, it is wider than in your original. \new Score { \new Staff \new Voice \relative c' { \voiceOne

slur problem

2014-08-30 Thread info
I have gotten this to work in score but not in the part \version 2.18.0 horn = \relative c, { \clef bass_8 \key c \major \time 4/4 fis,1 \time 3/4 (d'2.) \bar |. } \score { \new Staff \horn \layout { } } the slur from fis1 to the d'2. doesn't work here but did in the full score. So

Re: slur problem

2014-08-30 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Jay, 2014-08-30 21:54 GMT+02:00 i...@soundand.com: the slur from fis1 to the d'2. doesn't work here but did in the full score. So what do I do to make this work in the part? Try : \version 2.18.0 horn = \relative c, { \clef bass_8 \key c \major \time 4/4 fis,1 ( \time 3/4

Re: slur problem

2014-08-30 Thread Dominic
The slur should be attached to the end of the 'fis', not the beginning of the 'd', like this: /fis,1( \time 3/4 d'2.)/ -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-problem-tp165923p165926.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re; slur problem

2014-08-30 Thread info
Thank you Pierre and Dominic that was the solution. Jay ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Slur Problem....

2008-07-20 Thread PT.Guitar
Hi friends, http://www.nabble.com/file/p18556027/Noname.jpg How i can upper the end point of the slur on the g note? Thanks, -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slur-Problem-tp18556027p18556027.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive

Re: Slur Problem....

2008-07-20 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:25 AM, PT.Guitar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi friends, http://www.nabble.com/file/p18556027/Noname.jpg How i can upper the end point of the slur on the g note? Thanks, Something like this override should do the trick: \version 2.11.52 { \once \override Slur

Re: Slur Problem....

2008-07-20 Thread PT.Guitar
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slur-Problem-tp18556027p18557173.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing

slur problem

2007-06-08 Thread tao_lilyponduser
Hello, I got a problem with a slur. In the code below, a slur is supposed to go from bar 3 to the first note in bar 5. When I tried a standard slur, nothing happened, then I tried it with Phrasing Slur and at least a slur was drawn above bar 3+4 but ist sill doesn't reach bar 5. \regards Tao

Re: slur problem

2007-06-08 Thread Zoltan Selyem
Hello Tao, A smaller example of your problem is this: %% - LilyPond code - \version 2.11.23 \paper{ ragged-right=##t } \relative c'' { c c c c( | { c) c c c( } \\ { g g g g } c c) c c | } %% -- end of code -- The \upper \\

Re: slur problem - solved?

2007-06-08 Thread Zoltan Selyem
Hello Tao, In my previous letter I gave the explanation, now here is a solution. You should simply take that note (d4) out of the polyphony: %%% - \version 2.10.23 inS = { \override Voice.Fingering #'avoid-slur = #'inside } outS = {

Re: slur problem

2007-06-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Just read the next section on the manual, Explicitly instantiating voices. %% - LilyPond code - \version 2.11.23 \paper{ ragged-right=##t } \relative c'' { c c c c( | { \voiceOne c) c c c( } \new Voice { \voiceTwo g g g g } \oneVoice c c) c c | } %%

Recall: Voice / slur problem

2007-01-19 Thread Palmer, Ralph
Palmer, Ralph would like to recall the message, Voice / slur problem. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Voice / slur problem

2007-01-19 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The easiest solution is to exploit the clever trick provided in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00359.html Then, there is no need to keep both ends of a tie in the same Voice context. You should also read the section on Explicitly instantiating voices to understand why

Re: Voice / slur problem

2007-01-19 Thread Rune Zedeler
Palmer, Ralph wrote: I'm trying (right now) to reproduce only the piano part (i.e., the bottom two staves) in the measure in the attached .jpg. Because the two arpeggia overlap you actually have two voices, and therefore need to typeset them in two voices. In the following i use the

Re: Voice / slur problem

2007-01-19 Thread Rune Zedeler
Mats Bengtsson wrote: The easiest solution is to exploit the clever trick provided in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00359.html Really no need to use any tricks. The composer clearly sees the two arpeggii as separate voices and you therefore should represent them

Re: dashed slur problem

2003-07-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:05:20 + David Bobroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using dashed slurs but I'm having a problem switching between dashed and normal slurs. In the attached *.ly file the problem can be seen on the fourth line of the output. The switching in the first line works fine.

dashed slur problem

2003-06-22 Thread David Bobroff
I'm using dashed slurs but I'm having a problem switching between dashed and normal slurs. In the attached *.ly file the problem can be seen on the fourth line of the output. The switching in the first line works fine. In the fourth line it doesn't. If I separate out the fourth line I can get