Am 24.03.2014 17:52, schrieb Urs Liska:
I've just compiled a custom LilyPond with that patch in it and will soon
upload it for review. Although dodecaphonic-no-repeat is what _I_ had
asked for I do think this also makes sense.
https://codereview.appspot.com/79680044/
Rutger Hofman-2 wrote
[...]
As a fix, I made a small addition to music-functions.scm to add a
dodecaphonic-first accidental style. Patch against 2.17.18-1 attached.
[...]
Using dodecaphonic-first and adding ! here and there works fine for me.
I already apologize for replying to an old post
gilbertohasn...@gmail.com schrieb am 24.03.2014:
Rutger Hofman-2 wrote
[...]
As a fix, I made a small addition to music-functions.scm to add a
dodecaphonic-first accidental style. Patch against 2.17.18-1
attached.
[...]
Using dodecaphonic-first and adding ! here and there works fine for
me.
I already
(Or with an 's' at the end?)
The correct syntax is with the s and also without the apostrophe:
\accidentalStyle dodecaphonic-no-repeat
Thanks again, take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160772.html
Gilberto Agostinho wrote
The correct syntax is with the s [...]
I meant without without the s, as in repeat and NOT repeats
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160773.html
Sent from the User mailing list
- Original Message -
From: Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: dodecaphonic-first accidental style
Urs Liska wrote
David Nalesnik actually _did_ create a patch that I added to LilyPond. In
2.19
But of course it's easy not to notice that addition.
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net schrieb am 24.03.2014:
- Original Message -
From: Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: dodecaphonic-first accidental
accidental style. Patch against 2.17.18-1 attached.
[...]
Using dodecaphonic-first and adding ! here and there works fine for me.
I already apologize for replying to an old post (almost 1 year old!), but I
am really interested in this dodecaphonic-first accidental style. The
problem is I do not know
,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160778.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
in the two most mature commercial products???
Thanks again. Regards,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160778.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
., distance
between two notes)?! Painful days back then :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-first-accidental-style-tp141907p160784.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Am 24.03.2014 15:45, schrieb Rutger Hofman:
Right, so there is a new style dodecaphonic-no-repeat from 2.19.3
onwards. But it does something else than the style dodecaphonic-first
that I wrote about, long ago. dodecaphonic-no-repeat suppresses
accidentals for immediately repeated notes.
addition to music-functions.scm to add a
dodecaphonic-first accidental style. Patch against 2.17.18-1 attached.
For this Berg Op.5 score (which I am typesetting as a Lilypond exercise
in piano music; will report later) this requires a number of additional
force-accidental ! annotations because
I had been wondering that as well because I don't think it's all that
unusual, at least for early 20th century music (I have some Webern scores
printed in this way) but I couldn't see anything in the Lilypond
documentation.
If anyone has any suggestions I would be grateful too!
On 2 March 2013
Actually on closer inspection the Webern score I was referring does *not*
have the same method of accidentals as the Universal edition of the Berg
piece - accidentals are only omitted when a pitch is immediately repeated
in the same octave (I think that's actually more readable especially when
Hello all,
Taking a look at Berg Op. 5 (see Sibelius-related discussion) I realized that it
uses a slight variant of the dodecaphonic accidental style: every note has an
accidental, but only for its _first_ appearance in the bar.
Any advice on how to achieve this automatically?
Thanks best
16 matches
Mail list logo
