You need the magic of: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=782 - Good Luck!
Alex Jones-2 wrote
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good way to accomplish this in
lilypond?
time signature with a second time signature in parentheses?
Screen Shot 2015-05-23 at 5.41.47 PM.png (14K)
Yes! Thank you Peter (and Urs), I think now it's clear
Lilypond use a postfix syntax. To apply a function 'f' to the note 'a' the
lilypond syntax is a \f and not viceversa. Because the open parenthese is
like a function (a function that marks the first item) it must be written as
for all the
maybe this helps?
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=782
ole
Am 23.05.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Alex Jones akjonesjeff...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good way to accomplish this in lilypond?
time signature with a second time signature in parentheses?
Thanks in advance!
Thank you, this works!
It does look a little clunky.
I saw this, which gets the parentheses but doesn’t include the first
non-parenthesized item. Can these two items be combined?
Hi Alex,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Alex Jones akjonesjeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you, this works!
It does look a little clunky.
I agree--there's too much space. A simple fix is to use \concat, which
puts items directly beside each other, instead of \line in the original
function:
On 5/23/15 6:34 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Here is another test case for your patch:
\version 2.19.20
\new FretBoards {
d-1 a c'-1 fis' a'-11
g,-1 d f-1 b d'-1 g'-11
\transpose g a { g,-1 d f-1 b d'-1 g'-11 }
}
These chords can be played with one finger! ;)
So what
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good way to accomplish this in lilypond?
time signature with a second time signature in parentheses?
Thanks in advance!
-akj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
This worked like a charm, thanks to everyone!
-akj
On May 23, 2015, at 7:05 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
#(define ((time-parenthesized-time up down upp downp) grob)
(ly:stencil-combine-at-edge
(grob-interpret-markup grob
(markup #:override '(baseline-skip
Alex,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alex Jones akjonesjeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
This worked like a charm, thanks to everyone!
Great!
Thought of something. Why specify the numbers of the time signature in
effect? Not that it saves much time, but you could do this for a slightly
shorter
On 23.05.2015, at 06:22, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
+ some frequently used chords are missing, such as m7.5- and suspended
chords. (I know of course from my own experience that predefined fret
diagram tables unfortunately are never complete.)
m7.5- is not commonly used in
On 23.05.2015, at 06:22, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
+ some chords lead to unwanted barre indicators, e.g.:
+ d-1 a d¹ f¹ or
+ e, b,-3 e-3 gis-3 b e¹ (wrong fingers!)
I will look into those. Thanks.
Here is another test case for your patch:
\version 2.19.20
\new
Am 23.05.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
Suppose I want to slur the followings notes:
a8 b c d
then I have to write
a8 (b c d)
This looks a bit strange to me because I think it would be more 'natural'
(for me) write this:
(a8 b c d)
There is any reason why the syntax is like
Hello list
I'm trying to get a markup to help with repetitive addition of scale-degrees
with carats
I've got this far, but it's not picking up the new default baseline-skip value
\version 2.18.0
#(define-markup-command (sd layout props sdnum) (markup?)
#:properties ((baseline-skip 0.5))
On 23/05/2015 21:24, Damian leGassick wrote:
\version 2.18.0
#(define-markup-command (sd layout props sdnum) (markup?)
#:properties ((baseline-skip 0.5))
Put a number with a carat above the note.
(interpret-markup layout props
#{\markup \override #`(baseline-skip .
Hi, im just trying to notate this particular bar as an exercise and have
no idea where to begin. I need the note to be in the centre of the bar,
as well as having the dynamics as written.
Here is the image link: http://i.imgur.com/mN5AZEN.png
___
Hi Damian,
aah, Nick was faster than me... :-)
The easiest way I've found would be this:
% ---
\version 2.18.0
#(define-markup-command (sd layout props sdnum) (markup?)
Put a number with a carat above the note.
Thank you!! It works, very nice!
Usual question (usual for me): why this functionality is not part of the
standard lilypond?
* * *
I'm a new user. To take advantage of this functionality I copied and pasted
the source code of this feature in my source. Is this the correct/best way
to work
OK. Fuller answer.
1) It's easy to create a snippet in the LSR: it was designed for this purpose.
It's harder to update the main LilyPond package.
2) If the main package were updated, then we would also need to update the
documentation.
3) All the work on LilyPond is done by volunteers who
Hi Nick,
Centering notes was very common in past traditions, and indeed in various
modernist traditions. Lilypond does not do it out of the box. I think it must
be one of my personal top ten most wanted features. So, for people working
outside the Common Practice Era, you need to use some
Hi Nick,
A snippet to show how to use the centering function.
\version 2.19.20
% substitute your library directory
\include /home/a/lib/lilypond/centre.ly
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
}
treble = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\time 4/4
\centerNoteColumnOn
b1
\centerNoteColumnOff
- Original Message -
From: Gianmaria Lari gianmarial...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: rhytm
Thank you!! It works, very nice!
Usual question (usual for me): why this functionality is not part of the
standard lilypond?
Usual
Suppose I want to slur the followings notes:
a8 b c d
then I have to write
a8 (b c d)
This looks a bit strange to me because I think it would be more 'natural'
(for me) write this:
(a8 b c d)
There is any reason why the syntax is like it is?
Thank you, Gianmaria
--
View this message
I started using lilypond two weeks ago, wouldn't be a bit presumptuous for
me to propose this? Why the person that create the snippet does not propose
it?
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gianmaria Lari
Thank you for the Full answer :) I guessed only the number 4 - The
functionality you're using is not needed often... and wanted to be sure.
Ciao, g.
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
OK. Fuller answer.
1) It's easy to create a snippet in the LSR: it
Ciao Urs,
thank you for the link!
I read the page
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/on-the-un_002dnestedness-of-brackets-and-ties.nl.html
and I understood that slur markers are not brackets in the mathematical
sense but simply mark something to start or end but don't
On 2015-05-23 18:56, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
In Frescobaldi if you use Quick Insert to slur the four notes you'll get:
|a( b c d)|
I tend to think the syntax |a ( b c d )| is preferable, but maybe with
this syntax it is clearer that the '(' belongs to the 'a' and not to
the 'b' - and ')'
Hi Nick,
Hi Andrew,
I'm afraid that 'center-note-column' will not help since the score includes
a dynamic spanner.
Personally, I'd do something less sophisticated.
How about:
\version 2.18.2
myDynamics =
{
\set crescendoText = \markup\dynamic f
\set crescendoSpanner = #'text
\override
On 2015-05-23 18:29, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I understood that slur markers are not brackets in the mathematical
sense but simply mark something to start or end but don't understand the
consequences of this. Wouldn't be possible to slur the four notes a b c d
using the other syntax
(a b c
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', or { } is not needed. You can even
write a single note without brackets:
\new Staff a
but of course not two:
\new Staff a b
At the top level you need something to tell LilyPond that this is
On 2015-05-22 22:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/22/15 10:03 AM, 70147pers...@telia.com 70147pers...@telia.com
wrote:
Hi Carl!
Yes, you are the person with the big understanding. I learned t from
your solution, that you can, and in this case must, do things inside
Hi Nick,
for the dynamics you could simply do something like this (is not
considered in midi output, though):
{
a1_\markup { \halign #-0.3 \line { \dynamic f — \dynamic f } }
}
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
31 matches
Mail list logo
