missing stem

Please help me with this little problem. This is just one of my efforts, but in all of them I miss the stem on the first g'2: \version "2.18.0" { <<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c''1}{\stemDown g'2 a' |g' a'4 a'| g'1}>> \bar "|." }

Re: missing stem

Hi Bogi, You need to use the parallel voices correctly. The two voices need ‘\\‘ between them. <<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c'’1} \\ {\stemDown g'2 a' |g' a'4 a'| g'1}>> You can also use \new Voice. Have a look in the Notation Reference manual under Multiple Voices. I thought 2.18.2

Re: the custos: understanding how it works

Guys (David, Thomas, Jacques), thank you very much for the responses. I'll read the Contributor's Guide and see if I can have more specific questions in the future. And Jacques, no worries! Your example was still useful to me as it helped me to realise some things ;) Cheers, Leszek. On 22

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > > > The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number > based > > on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be > > numbered 1-20

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

On 22.11.2015 22:41, Alberto Simões wrote: Hi all, Final version here: https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody spots any critical issue. The last measure of the Introduction actually has

Re: question about overrides within repeats

David Nalesnik writes: > The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number based > on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be > numbered 1-20 in order, but that's clearly not the case. There's a binding > of texts which

Re: question about overrides within repeats

> Well, System::post_processing ends by creating the stencils of a > system in reverse order. That's probably not helping. A bug? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Hi, On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Simon Albrecht writes: > > > On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Thomas Morley writes: > >> > >>> Though, why it is that arbitrary? > >>> > >>> Look at this

Re: missing stem

Hi Bogi, > in all of them I miss the stem on the first g’2: Perhaps you mean SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.18.0" theMusic = { << { \voiceOne c''1 ~ | c''2 } \new Voice { \voiceTwo g'2 a' | g'2 } >> \oneVoice 4 q | 1 \bar "|." } \score { \new Staff

Re: missing stem

Hello Bogi, On 23.11.2015 00:50, Bogi Lützen wrote: Please help me with this little problem. This is just one of my efforts, but in all of them I miss the stem on the first g'2: \version "2.18.0" { <<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c''1}{\stemDown g'2 a' |g'

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

Alberto, On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n183952...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Final version here: > > https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf > > Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in

Re: Strange LilyPond crash

Marc Hohl writes: > Am 21.11.2015 um 16:54 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Marc Hohl writes: >> >>> Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: >>> [...] Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the inner one a slur indicating the bowing. That would not make much sense,

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote: One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in the source engraving (m. 42) is a typo as it is omitted in the next measure. It is definitely not. There is perfect

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n183931...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote: > > One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from > > tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

> Werner, any suggestions for _not_ using a tie in that manner? For me, a tie lengthens a time value of a given pitch; it has no other meaning. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

Hi On 22/11/15 13:52, tisimst wrote: Valse 1 looks great! There's a natural in the LH chord in m. 58 that shouldn't be there. If so a double check on all accidentals just to be sauté there aren't others that should or shouldn't be there. Yep, still fixing slurs, only. I have a couple other

Re: Strange LilyPond crash

Am 21.11.2015 um 16:54 schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: [...] Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for pending_moment that no longer has an iter_ to refer to. More

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I >>> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the >>> inner one a slur

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

Alberto, On Saturday, November 21, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n18391...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > On 21.11.2015 20:21, Alberto Simões wrote: > > > > > > > On 20/11/15 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote: > >> Hey > >> > >> On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote: > >>> That

the custos: understanding how it works

I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak, check what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience. I first tried the code for the first example from here:

Re: sponsorship offer: Lyric fixes (GSoC, etc.)

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Agreed. Lilypond is still the best tool out there for my needs. I just > wish I could do more, and more beautiful, engraving with a smaller > investment of time and effort. (Isn’t that the eternal quest?) Well, there is the related quest

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Urs Liska writes: > Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I > suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the > inner one a slur indicating the bowing. That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs in violin music are

Re: Strange LilyPond crash

Marc Hohl writes: > Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Marc Hohl writes: > [...] >> Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for >> pending_moment that no longer has an iter_ to refer to. >> >> More likely than not, one of the fixes

Re: guitar scale diagram - change root

Hey, thank you for the idea's. I thought I had to add an argument to the list, but I'm not that advanced in using lilypond to implement it myself. With this kind of solutions my understanding grows bit by bit :-) . That other thread was very interesting for me indeed. It works, great! grtz,

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: > >> 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM,

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat? > > No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at _input_ time. > If you put it in a variable and use that variable 3 times, the colors >

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

On 12/11/15 17:53, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 12.11.2015 16:52, Alberto Simões wrote: Hello, Simon! On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote: Two annotations: – Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for DynamicTextSpanner against SpanBar; I don’t quite know the best way to do it,

Re: question about overrides within repeats

2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> >> > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat? >> >> No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Is there any way to get the override to be

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

Hey, On 11/11/15 19:22, tisimst wrote: This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines ;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that I immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged for: You should ALWAYS enclose a tied

question about overrides within repeats

Hi, Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color occurs, a new color from the list is used: \version "2.19.30" #(define test (let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta))) (lambda () (let ((color (car colors))) (set!

Re: the custos: understanding how it works

2015-11-22 16:41 GMT+01:00 Leszek Wroński : > I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was > wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak, check > what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience. I first tried the >

Re: question about overrides within repeats

David Nalesnik writes: > Hi, > > Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color > occurs, a new color from the list is used: > > \version "2.19.30" > > #(define test >(let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta))) >

Re: the custos: understanding how it works

Leszek Wroński writes: > I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was > wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak, > check what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience. > source code, and after grepping found

Re: the custos: understanding how it works

Hello Leszek, Here is an example from this list. JM \version "2.18.1" \layout { indent = 0 ragged-right = ##t \context { \Staff \consists "Custos_engraver" % \override Staff.Custos.stencil = ##f % \override Staff.Custos.style = ##f } } \relative c' { d1

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Thomas Morley writes: > Though, why it is that arbitrary? > > Look at this variation and the attached image: > > \version "2.19.29" > #(define test-nmbrs > (let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4))) > (lambda (grob) > (let ((n (car nmbrs))) > (set! nmbrs

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: Thomas Morley writes: Though, why it is that arbitrary? Look at this variation and the attached image: \version "2.19.29" #(define test-nmbrs (let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4))) (lambda (grob) (let ((n

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Simon Albrecht writes: > On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> Though, why it is that arbitrary? >>> >>> Look at this variation and the attached image: >>> >>> \version "2.19.29" >>> #(define test-nmbrs >>>

Re: Gounod - Le Rendez Vous

Hi all, Final version here: https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody spots any critical issue. I should say I am quite happy with it, and will print it ASAP to play it :) Thank you, again,

Re: the custos: understanding how it works

Hello Leszek, Oops, looks like I totally misunderstood the kind of help you were looking for… Sorry for the noise! JM > Le 22 nov. 2015 à 17:37, Jacques Menu a écrit : > > Hello Leszek, > > Here is an example from this list. > > JM > > > > \version "2.18.1" > >