Re: Four Part Piano Staff

On Mon 01 Feb 2016 at 20:31:27 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > In the past I have used the "variable" format. Naturally. > This leads to some repeated adjustments in the placement of the second voice. I don't understand what you mean by "repeated adjustments". > I prefer not to use

Re: D.C. al fine

Noeck writes: > Dear Graham, David, all, > > I never used a real repeat structure for D.C. al Fine pieces. But your > example, Graham, does it very nicely. I put it into a little function > below which makes it easy to reuse. A \repeatsegno follows the same > lines. I would

Re: Four Part Piano Staff

On 02.02.2016 03:25, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello, I want to make a template for a piano staff with two explicitly instantiated voices (not <<{ } \\{ } >>) in each staff – this for four part fugues. Any assistance in accomplishing this would be greatly appreciated. To come back to

Re: How to align text and dynamixs

On 02.02.2016 08:43, Carl-Henrik Buschmann wrote: Thank you! (Stupid brain seizing to work in the night, of course it is articulations...) It did the trick but i only understand half of what's going on in what you wrote. In the interest of learning, would you mind to decipher or give a

RE: Four Part Piano Staff

Simon, Thank you for your reply and the suggested code. What you provide works well with a single staff - as presented in the documentation. When inserted into a piano staff two additional staves are included between the two piano staves. Mark -Original Message- From: Simon Albrecht

Re: Four Part Piano Staff

On 03.02.2016 00:09, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Thank you for your reply and the suggested code. What you provide works well with a single staff - as presented in the documentation. When inserted into a piano staff two additional staves are included between the two piano staves. You’d need to

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

2016-02-02 16:00 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : > Hi Kieren, hi Caio et All, > > Here's a trial to find a workaround avoiding the use of a TextSpanner: > > \version "2.18.2" > > \relative c'' { > \set Staff.pedalSustainStyle = #'mixed > \once\override

Re: Four Part Piano Staff

Hi Mark, > Thank you for your reply and the suggested code. What you provide works > well with a single staff - as presented in the documentation. When > inserted into a piano staff two additional staves are included between > the two piano staves. you should start posting the code you use

Re: Four Part Piano Staff

Am 03.02.2016 um 00:17 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 03.02.2016 00:09, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: >> Thank you for your reply and the suggested code. What you provide >> works well >> with a single staff - as presented in the documentation. When >> inserted into >> a piano staff two additional

RE: Four Part Piano Staff

Michael, Thank you for your response and suggestion. Whenever I make an inquiry I attach a .ly file. Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Gerdau [mailto:m...@qata.de] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:17 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: Mark Stephen Mrotek

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

Thomas Morley wrote Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:17 PM > To make it work with recent devel versions you need to add > \once\override Staff.SustainPedalLineSpanner.layer = #2 %% every value >>1 will do > > No idea why. > 'layer is unset for SustainPedalLineSpanner in 2.18.2 _and_ 2.19.35 When

RE: Four Part Piano Staff

Simon, Thank you for your reply and the suggested code. It is exactly what I wanted! Mark -Original Message- From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:17 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; 'lilypond-user'

Re: Four Part Piano Staff

On Tue 02 Feb 2016 at 15:37:29 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Michael, > > Thank you for your response and suggestion. Whenever I make an inquiry I > attach a .ly file. Your reply, quoted below, implies a question: "Why do I get two unwanted additional staves?". I can only hazard a

Re: D.C. al fine

Dear Graham, David, all, I never used a real repeat structure for D.C. al Fine pieces. But your example, Graham, does it very nicely. I put it into a little function below which makes it easy to reuse. A \repeatsegno follows the same lines. I would consider these four versions to be standard

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

Hi Kieren, hi Caio et All, Here's a trial to find a workaround avoiding the use of a TextSpanner: \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \set Staff.pedalSustainStyle = #'mixed \once\override Staff.SustainPedalLineSpanner.stencil = #ly:line-spanner::print \once\override

Re: D.C. al fine

Joram, I'm glad you found the snippet useful. Maybe it will find its way into the repository, although I don't know how to make that happen. Thanks for the reference to the previous thread[1]. It's not hard to see how the technique in the current thread can be extended to the various

Re: Passing along variable-number arguments

Urs Liska writes: > Am 02.02.2016 um 00:44 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> In this code "format" receives "fmt" (the format strings) and "vals" - >>> the *list* of arguments. >>> How should I modify this so "format" doesn't

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

Hi Harm, 2016-02-03 0:17 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > It's 'articulations not 'articulation. > > >(set! (ly:music-property first-element 'articulation) > > (cons (make-music 'SustainEvent 'span-direction -1) > >

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

Hi Trevor, Thank you for the explanation. Cheers, Pierre 2016-02-03 0:37 GMT+01:00 Trevor Daniels : > > Thomas Morley wrote Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:17 PM > > > To make it work with recent devel versions you need to add > > \once\override

Re: Sustain pedal cautionary after line break

Added to the LSR: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1024 Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Removing white space from svg output

Paul Morris paulwmorris.com> writes: > > > On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Paul Booker homebass.net> wrote: > > > > Ok, that wasn't clear, got it now, thanks > > Works for one-line parts but also converts two line pieces to one line, > > ignoring the \break. Can I reinstate that somehow, without