extLengthOn
> d4 _\markup{\italic "Fine "}
> \fermata
> g4 \f
> b4
> }
>
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jacques Menu" <mailto:imj-...@bluewin.ch>>
> To: "Lilypond-User Mailing List&
ot;
> \time 3/4
>
> \textLengthOn
> d4 _\markup{\italic "Fine "}
> \fermata
> g4 \f
> b4
> }
>
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> - Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Menu"
> To: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
&g
\key g \major
\clef "bass"
\time 3/4
\textLengthOn
d4 _\markup{\italic "Fine "}
\fermata
g4 \f
b4
}
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Menu"
To: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 1:30 PM
Subj
Hello Phil,
\textLengthOn doesn't solve the problem, thanks anyway!
JM
Jacques Menu, iPhone
> Le 7 août 2017 à 08:19, Menu Jacques a écrit :
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Can the « Fine » and « f » be on the same horizontal line while remaining
> attached to two differents notes, without using any s
textLengthOn ?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Menu Jacques
> *To:* Lilypond-User Mailing List
> *Cc:* Menu Jacques
> *Sent:* Monday, August 07, 2017 7:19 AM
> *Subject:* Alignment problem
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Ca
textLengthOn ?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Menu Jacques
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Cc: Menu Jacques
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 7:19 AM
Subject: Alignment problem
Hello folks,
Can the « Fine » and « f » be on the same horizontal line while
Hello folks,
Can the « Fine » and « f » be on the same horizontal line while remaining
attached to two differents notes, without using any separate dynamics voice?
Thanks!
JM
\version "2.19.55"
\relative b, {
\key g \major
\clef "bass"
\time 3/4
d4
\fermata _\markup{\italic "Fine"}
direction using
> \stemUp and \stemDown. If you feel the need to use these
> you almost certainly should be thinking of changing the
> voice instead.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Giampaolo Orrigo
> *To:* Trevor Daniels
> *Cc:* lilyp
ou feel the need to use these
you almost certainly should be thinking of changing the
voice instead.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Giampaolo Orrigo
To: Trevor Daniels
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2017 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: Alignment problem
Trevor,
r Daniels
wrote:
> Hi Geppo
>
> You'd be more likely to get a reply if you posted an
> immediately compilable example showing the problem.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Giampaolo Orrigo
> *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Sent:* Satur
Hi Geppo
You'd be more likely to get a reply if you posted an
immediately compilable example showing the problem.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Giampaolo Orrigo
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 12:02 AM
Subject: Alignment problem
Hi,
t
Hi,
trying to type an organ piece.
Here the original code:
Tiple = \relative c'' {
\global
% Music follows here.
\showStaffSwitch
d'2. c4 b a g2~ g g c2. b4 a g f2 a1 bf2. a4
}
Alto = \relative c'' {
\global
% Music follows here.
\showStaffSwitch
b a g2 d' g~ g4 f e d c1 c2. b4 \
- Original Message -
From: Peter Toye
To: Wim van Dommelen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: Alignment problem with instrument name
Thanks. As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that
automatically. But at least
Hi Peter,
> As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that automatically.
1. It places the left edge of the music automatically. When you think about it,
this makes far more sense than having the left edge placed according to the
width of the instrument names (and thus potentiall
Wim,
Thanks. As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that
automatically. But at least I've got a workaround.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 8:50:04 PM, you wrote:
What you need is setting the ind
n out of "C.A." that delivers you more space. Regards,Wim.
Untitled10.ly
Description: Binary data
Title: Alignment problem with instrument name
On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:20 , Peter Toye wrote:I'm having a problem with getting instrument names aligned with the edge of the paper. With
> On 22 Jul 2012, at 03:53 , wjm wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>> Moving the Glissando and TextScript overrides to just before the
>> relevant note seems to do the job, I think.
>> Note the variation of offset values to suit
>>
>> You might have to set flag transparency where appropriate if/when you
>> m
Greetings,
Moving the Glissando and TextScript overrides to just before the
relevant note seems to do the job, I think.
Note the variation of offset values to suit
You might have to set flag transparency where appropriate if/when you
move to a newer version of LP
Hope this helps
Bill
s16.
\
Hi,
I have some problems with the vertical alignment of text. I tried both
the \halign, \lower inside a \markup and explicit offset commands with
an \override, but I couldn't get it right. This sample shows the
problem in detail. I do want to move the two "gliss." text-strings
nearly on t
2012/7/21 :
> Hi,
>
> I have some problems with the vertical alignment of text. I tried both the
> \halign, \lower inside a \markup and explicit offset commands with an
> \override, but I couldn't get it right. This sample shows the problem in
> detail. I do want to move the two "gliss." text-stri
Hi,
I have some problems with the vertical alignment of text. I tried both the
halign, lower inside a markup and explicit offset commands with an
override, but I couldn't get it right. This sample shows the problem in
detail. I do want to move the two "gliss." text-strings nearly on top or
directl
Roman Stawski wrote:
This short polyphony employs
A trivial customised Voice
but the lyrics ignore
the first note in the score --
that's not the behaviour of choice.
Wow! Valentin, I think this is the first Bug Poem for the LilyPond report.
__
On 25/02/2010 23:05, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 25 February 2010 21:04, Roman Stawski wrote:
>
>> This short polyphony employs
>> A trivial customised Voice
>> but the lyrics ignore
>> the first note in the score --
>> that's not the behaviour of choice.
> Hi,
>
> That's the same as issue 7
On 25 February 2010 21:04, Roman Stawski wrote:
> This short polyphony employs
> A trivial customised Voice
> but the lyrics ignore
> the first note in the score --
> that's not the behaviour of choice.Hi,
That's the same as issue 770, isn't it?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?
This short polyphony employs
A trivial customised Voice
but the lyrics ignore
the first note in the score --
that's not the behaviour of choice.
-
\version "2.13.11"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\name MainVoice
\alias Voice
}
\context {
Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=432
Cheers,
- Graham
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Neil Puttock wrote:
Just to clarify this, are you saying that this happens as a result of
the default setting of break-align-symbols combined with moving the
mark engraver to the
On 8/30/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quoting Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > I don't mean to hassle you, but nothing's appeared on bug-lilypond yet.
> If
> > you like, I'll post a report myself.
>
> I don't know where you looked, but it's certainly in the mailing li
Quoting Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I don't mean to hassle you, but nothing's appeared on bug-lilypond yet. If
you like, I'll post a report myself.
I don't know where you looked, but it's certainly in the mailing list
archives,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2007-08/ms
Hi Mats,
On 8/28/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Here's an example, which I also send to bug-lilypond.
>
> \relative { \mark "C" c1 | \mark "D" d | \clef alto
> \mark "E" e | \mark "F" f |
> }
>
> % Uncommenting this layout block, causes both the C and the E marks
> % to m
Neil Puttock wrote:
Just to clarify this, are you saying that this happens as a result of
the default setting of break-align-symbols combined with moving the
mark engraver to the staff context?
No, I was just speculating, without having really tested my hypothesis.
Sorry about that. Now tha
Hi Mats,
On 8/27/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Neil Puttock wrote:
> >
> > I've just encountered another problem - clef changes skew the
> > rehearsal mark positioning to the left of the bar-line:
> >
> That's since the default setting for the break-align-symbols property
Neil Puttock wrote:
I've just encountered another problem - clef changes skew the
rehearsal mark positioning to the left of the bar-line:
That's since the default setting for the break-align-symbols property of
the
RehearsalMark objects is #'(staff-bar clef), which gives the desired layo
On 8/14/07, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here's a layout section I'm using to allow rehearsal marks to be printed
> on more than one stave in an orchestral score:
>
> \layout {
> \context { \Score
> \remove "Staff_collecting_engraver"
>
On 8/20/07, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/20, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Unfortunately, neither worked.
>
> Yes, actually I'm experiencing many problems with this tweak too; can
> anybody tell Neil and me if this should be regarded as a bug, or if
> we're doing
2007/8/20, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unfortunately, neither worked.
Yes, actually I'm experiencing many problems with this tweak too; can
anybody tell Neil and me if this should be regarded as a bug, or if
we're doing something wrong?
Valentin
Hi Valentin,
I've tried using the following:
\override Staff.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol = #'key-signature (
2.10.29);
\override Staff.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(key-signature) (
2.11.29).
Unfortunately, neither worked.
Regards,
Neil
2007/8/14, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here's a layout section I'm using to allow rehearsal marks to be printed on
> more than one stave in an orchestral score:
> This works fine, apart from one snag: overriding #'break-align-symbol has no
> effect
You might want to use the new syntax, d
Hi everybody,
Here's a layout section I'm using to allow rehearsal marks to be printed on
more than one stave in an orchestral score:
\layout {
\context { \Score
\remove "Staff_collecting_engraver"
\remove "Mark_engraver"
}
\context { \Staff
Citando Illtud Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So there's no way to achieve what I want? Ie, manually
> beamed notes with a syllable per note within a beam aligned
> normally under the note?
Yes, there is just use this property:
\set ignoreMelismata = ##t
Ar8 ddydd Sul aeth
Dic yn
Carl,
Does this work? The beaming is the same as in your .png, and the lyrics are
properly aligned, as near as I can tell.
% \autoBeamOff
Yes, it was my fault - I didn't understand that I didn't need to
disable autobeaming to use manual beams. It's pretty clear from
the documentati
Illtud Daniel llgc.org.uk> writes:
> See the attached .png - it seems to be left-aligning every syllable
> except for the last syllable on a beam.
>
Does this work? The beaming is the same as in your .png, and the lyrics are
properly aligned, as near as I can tell.
% Beginning of Lilypon
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
You may also be mislead by something. If you want manual beaming, you
don't have to say \autoBeamOff, just use a[ b c d]
You're right. This is where I'm going wrong - I understood that
I would need autobeaming switched off to be able to manual beam.
This is my mistake. Tha
You may also be mislead by something. If you want manual beaming, you
don't have to say \autoBeamOff, just use a[ b c d]
If you still want to leave 8th notes without automatic beams, without
saying \autoBeamOff you can set up something like this:
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 8)
I don't understand. If you say \autoBeamOff, a8[ b] will be regarded as
a melisma.
So the lyrics for it will be only one syllable, like, this4
Bert
Illtud Daniel írta:
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
It's not a bug. The lyrics syllables are considered as melisma
syllables, so the are aligned left.
Th
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
It's not a bug. The lyrics syllables are considered as melisma
syllables, so the are aligned left.
Thanks for the reply, Bertalan - much appreciated.
So there's no way to achieve what I want? Ie, manually
beamed notes with a syllable per note within a beam aligned
normall
It's not a bug. The lyrics syllables are considered as melisma
syllables, so the are aligned left.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
You have not associated the lyrics to the melody. You should use
lyricsto or addlyrics, see the doc.
But I thought that wouldn't work with manual note durations.
I'm manually beaming, and my beams don't mean melismas.
So I'm following what the doc says here:
http://lilyp
You have not associated the lyrics to the melody. You should use
lyricsto or addlyrics, see the doc.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I guess it would also help if I actually included the png
snippet...
--
Illtud Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[apologies - I originally sent this to lilypond-bugs, I shouldn't
have]
I'm getting lyrics left-aligned to noteheads with autobeaming off.
I'm looking for normal alignment (first vowel of syllable).
See the attached .png - it seems to be left-aligning every syllable
except for the last syllable
riccardo orfei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> er... we were talking of a 2.4.5 not of a 2.5.x, didn't we?
Yes. See http://tac.ki.iif.hu/lilypond.html, the
announcement hasn't yet arrived to info-lilypond. Caveat:
some characters in the PDF output look strange. The PS is
fine, however.
--
Feri.
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
I am sure.
Alas, "the last famous words"!
I have been invited by Mats to send him my stuff, which I did, and the
very next minute I found out what the problem was:
I didn't remove the "\new Lyrics" after each \lyricsto clause,
nullifying the effect of the grouping.
Of, cour
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
> Are you sure? When I try the following example with LilyPond
> version 2.4.5, I get all the lyrics in a single line.
>
> /Mats
I am sure. If it's not considered an abuse, I think I could post my
.png version of the snippet.
It sounds very strange. I just tried the
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
riccardo orfei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody version.
That would be Ferenc Wagner's version, right?
riccardo orfei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Riccardo Orfei wrote:
>>>
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody version.
>>>
>>> That would be Ferenc Wagner's version, right?
>>>
Can anybody tell
Helder Gomes da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Use:
>> deb http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/debian woody main
>> and apt-get install lilypond (not lilypond-snapshot)
>>
>
> Thank you very much
> Can you tell-me if the mirror is down?
It is not a mirror, but it is down and will stay down.
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody version.
That would be Ferenc Wagner's version, right?
Can anybody tell me how to upgrade gracefully from this version to a
newer one?
He has
Use:
deb http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/debian woody main
and apt-get install lilypond (not lilypond-snapshot)
Thank you very much
Can you tell-me if the mirror is down?
I'm not able to retrieve the packages list with apt-get update
I'm using debian sarge (testing)
Helder
__
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody version.
That would be Ferenc Wagner's version, right?
Can anybody tell me how to upgrade gracefully from this version to a
newer one?
Paul Scott wrote:
Helder Gomes da Silva wrote:
He has upgraded it to 2.4.5 just a couple of days ago. apt-get
update apt-get install should do it.
I'm using
deb http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/ ./
in my sources.list configuration.
With apt-cache show I can only see version 2.4.2
Use:
deb
Helder Gomes da Silva wrote:
He has upgraded it to 2.4.5 just a couple of days ago. apt-get
update apt-get install should do it.
I'm using
deb http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/ ./
in my sources.list configuration.
With apt-cache show I can only see version 2.4.2
Use:
deb http://afavant.elte
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Riccardo Orfei wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody version.
>
> That would be Ferenc Wagner's version, right?
>
>> Can anybody tell me how to upgrade gracefully from this version to a
>> newer one?
>
> He has upgraded it
He has upgraded it to 2.4.5 just a couple of days ago. apt-get update
apt-get install should do it.
I'm using
deb http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/ ./
in my sources.list configuration.
With apt-cache show I can only see version 2.4.2
I'm having problems during installation, but I don't know
Riccardo Orfei wrote:
> Are you sure? When I try the following example with LilyPond
> version 2.4.5, I get all the lyrics in a single line.
>
> /Mats
I am sure. If it's not considered an abuse, I think I could post my
.png version of the snippet.
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, t
> Are you sure? When I try the following example with LilyPond
> version 2.4.5, I get all the lyrics in a single line.
>
> /Mats
I am sure. If it's not considered an abuse, I think I could post my
.png version of the snippet.
Unfortunately, I am running Lilypond 2.4.2, the Debian Woody versio
Are you sure? When I try the following example with LilyPond
version 2.4.5, I get all the lyrics in a single line.
/Mats
\version "2.4.0"
\include "italiano.ly"
% tilde = ~
global = { \time 4/4 \key mib \major }
%
= \relative { do re mi fa }
= \relative { sol' la si do }
= \relati
Sorry,
I tried it, but it doesn't still work.
Any hint?
Ric
==
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Keep all the lyrics within the same Lyrics context:
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\repeat volta 2 { \context Voice = "voice" { \ } }
\alternative { \context Voice = "altI" { \ }
\context Voice = "alt
Keep all the lyrics within the same Lyrics context:
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\repeat volta 2 { \context Voice = "voice" { \ } }
\alternative { \context Voice = "altI" { \ }
\context Voice = "altII" { \ }
}
}
\new Lyrics <<
\lyricsto "voice" \ly
\lyricsto "altI" \ly
\lyricsto "
dear lilypond users,
I am experiencing some trouble in writing lyrics in a song with repeats
and alternatives.
Here is a sample of what I get: the text of this simple song is being
displayed on three lines.
What am I supposed to do to have my text on a single line?
Thank you for your kind attenti
I'm attempting to typeset a piece which has multiple parts (SATB),
each of which have two verses of lyrics. I can't get the lyrics to
align at all with the notes, either via \addlyrics or by manually
specifying the duration of each syllable. I'm pretty new to Lilypond,
pardon if I'm missing s
Hi,
I am running lilypond 1.6.0 (debian unstable package)
While moving my pieces from 1.4.x to 1.6.x, I met some troubles.
The following example shows one of them: lyric syllables are not
aligned with the first note of beam groups, as they used to be.
\score {
\addly
71 matches
Mail list logo
