Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

2018-11-11 Thread Urs Liska
Am 11. November 2018 22:14:31 MEZ schrieb Noeck : >Am 11.11.18 um 12:13 schrieb Thomas Morley: >> A very quick glance offered only one snippet where stemUp/Down is >reasonable: Stem and Slur in different directions. > > >I think \stemUp/Down has its place as a fine tuning not a replacement >for

Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

2018-11-11 Thread Noeck
Am 11.11.18 um 12:13 schrieb Thomas Morley: > A very quick glance offered only one snippet where stemUp/Down is reasonable: > Stem and Slur in different directions. I think \stemUp/Down has its place as a fine tuning not a replacement for voices. Here is a snippet where I actually think it is

Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

2018-11-11 Thread Thomas Morley
Am So., 11. Nov. 2018 um 11:57 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > Use \voiceTwo instead of \stemDown, then LilyPond will place the rest > > correctly and the warning disappears. > > Sometimes I think we should undocument \stemUp/\stemDown. This is one > of the more

Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

2018-11-11 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > Use \voiceTwo instead of \stemDown, then LilyPond will place the rest > correctly and the warning disappears. Sometimes I think we should undocument \stemUp/\stemDown. This is one of the more frequent questions on the list, and it's not like they make a lot of sense as

Re: Avoiding the message about too many colliding rests

2018-11-11 Thread Thomas Morley
Am So., 11. Nov. 2018 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Joseph Srednicki : > > Hello: > > The following measure causes Lilypond to issue a warning about too many > colliding rests. > > Is there a way that I can code this measure to avoid the warning? > > I checked the online mail archive. I found a message