Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>>> Of course I can do
>>>
>>> circlefunc = \markup\circle\etc
>>> \markup \test \circlefunc "whatever"
>> You can? Have you tried? \circlefunc here is quite equivalent to
>> \circle .
>
> Hm, I think I do not understand. With
>
> test =
> #(define-scheme-function
Of course I can do
circlefunc = \markup\circle\etc
\markup \test \circlefunc "whatever"
You can? Have you tried? \circlefunc here is quite equivalent to
\circle .
Hm, I think I do not understand. With
test =
#(define-scheme-function (enclosure content)
(markup-function? markup?)
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> test =
>> #(define-scheme-function (enclosure content)
>>(markup-function? markup?)
>>(list enclosure #{ \markup \box #content #}))
>>
>> \markup \test \markup \circle \with-color #red \etc "whatever"
>
> Amazing, wonderfully elegant.
>
> Is
Hi David,
test =
#(define-scheme-function (enclosure content)
(markup-function? markup?)
(list enclosure #{ \markup \box #content #}))
\markup \test \markup \circle \with-color #red \etc "whatever"
Amazing, wonderfully elegant.
Is there a way to avoid the second "\markup" and "\etc"
Urs Liska writes:
> In the following markup command definition
>
> #(define-markup-command (test layout props enclosure content)
> (scheme? markup?)
>(interpret-markup layout props (markup #:circle content)))
>
> I would like to make the #:circle parametric, i.e. I want to pass
> something
Hi Lukas,
Am Samstag, den 04.07.2020, 10:22 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Hi Urs,
>
> > I have tried various things, but I don't seem to understand how
> > that
> > primitive-eval actually works here. Your solution does only work
> > when
> > the input is a simple markup (string), not when
Hi Urs,
I have tried various things, but I don't seem to understand how that
primitive-eval actually works here. Your solution does only work when
the input is a simple markup (string), not when it is wrapped in other
markup commands.
It seems to work quite robustly if you draw the given
Am Samstag, den 04.07.2020, 05:28 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
>
> Am 3. Juli 2020 23:33:42 MESZ schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser
> :
> > > #(define (get-scheme-markup-function func)
> > >(string->symbol
> > > (string-append "make-"
> > >(symbol->string func)
> > >
Am 3. Juli 2020 23:33:42 MESZ schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser :
>
>> #(define (get-scheme-markup-function func)
>> (string->symbol
>> (string-append "make-"
>> (symbol->string func)
>> "-markup")))
>
>... which should be replaced by
>
>#(define
#(define (get-scheme-markup-function func)
(string->symbol
(string-append "make-"
(symbol->string func)
"-markup")))
... which should be replaced by
#(define (get-scheme-markup-function func)
(symbol-append 'make- func '-markup))
Sorry, I had
Hi Urs,
Thanks a lot. That's exactly the kind of procedure I can store and
apply:
\version "2.20.0"
#(define-markup-command (dyna layout props func content)(symbol?
markup?)
(let*
((funcs
`((box . ,make-box-markup)
(circle . ,make-circle-markup
On 2020-07-03 1:07 pm, Urs Liska wrote:
But I'd rather do something like
(markup (assq-ref enclosures enclosure) "CC")
markup is a macro, and macros appear to have unique rules of evaluation.
The following approach defers the macro expansion:
\version "2.20.0"
Am Freitag, 03. Juli 2020 22:07 CEST, Urs Liska schrieb:
> > Syntacilally? That would be a scheme keyword.
>
> So that would be difficult to inject from a variable/argument, isn't
> it?
No, why? You can of course store a keyword in a variable and/or pass it as an
argument.
> I can of course
Hi Robin,
Am Freitag, den 03.07.2020, 22:11 +0200 schrieb Robin Bannister:
> Urs Liska wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I don't really have an idea what "#:circle" actually
> > *is*, so I have no clue about getting where I need to.
>
> I think it's a sort of macro thingy, trying to be easy to be
Urs Liska wrote:
Unfortunately I don't really have an idea what "#:circle" actually
*is*, so I have no clue about getting where I need to.
I think it's a sort of macro thingy, trying to be easy to be used.
Look at 'Known issues and warnings' at the bottom of
Am Freitag, den 03.07.2020, 21:58 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mattes:
>
> Am Freitag, 03. Juli 2020 21:52 CEST, Urs Liska <
> li...@openlilylib.org> schrieb:
>
> > Unfortunately I don't really have an idea what "#:circle" actually
> > *is*, so I have no clue about getting where I need to.
>
>
Am Freitag, 03. Juli 2020 21:52 CEST, Urs Liska schrieb:
> Unfortunately I don't really have an idea what "#:circle" actually
> *is*, so I have no clue about getting where I need to.
Syntacilally? That would be a scheme keyword.
Cheers, RalfD
> BestUrs
>
>
--
Ralf Mattes
Hochschule für
17 matches
Mail list logo
