Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-16 Thread bart deruyter
Hey all,

because of the absence of lilyglyphs in ubuntu 20.04 packages, I downloaded
it from git, moved the extracted folder to:
~/texmf/tex/latex/
renamed the fonts folder to lilyglyphs and moved it to:
~/texmf/fonts/opentype/
this resulted in: Package fontspec Error: The font "emmentaler-16" cannot
be found...g}},

I guess the lilyglyphs package is working, but can't find the fonts.
My question then is, which the correct path should be? I tried:
~/texmf/fonts/opentype/
~/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/ (according to packages.ubunt.com that's the
path used in usr/share/texlive/)
~/texmf/fonts/
Or do I have to modify some file in the lilyglyphs package and change the
path to where it should look?

Thanks,
Bart

https://esmiltania.be
On Twitter 
On Google+ 


Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:24 schreef bart deruyter :

> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> Indeed, I installed it using synaptic.
> Browsing in the ubuntu packages on:
>
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=focal=any=contents=lilyglyphs.sty
> I don't find it either in 'focal', but I do find it in 'eoan'.
>
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=eoan=any=contents=lilyglyphs.sty
> There I read it should be in the texlive-music package.
> Reading the description of 'texlive-music' in synaptic on my current
> system (20.04 or focal) lilyglyphs.sty is not mentioned either.
>
> https://esmiltania.be
> On Twitter 
> On Google+ 
>
>
> Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:13 schreef Urs Liska :
>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> > > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter <
>> > > bart.deruy...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know
>> > > > something.
>> > > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a
>> > > > luatex
>> > > > file
>> > > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
>> > > >
>> > > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
>> > > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it
>> > > > has
>> > > > been
>> > > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't
>> > > > find
>> > > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will
>> > > investigate.
>> >
>> > How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The
>> > versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live?
>> >
>> > I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual
>> > packages did you install.
>> > https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist
>> > indicates
>> > lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection.
>> >
>> > Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the
>> > possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove
>> > packages without warning/asking the maintainers first.
>>
>> I just had a closer look and found that
>> a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs
>> which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure,
>> but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway.
>>
>> b)
>> I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and
>> Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list.
>>
>> Urs
>>
>> >
>> > BestUrs
>> >
>> > > Urs
>> > >
>> > > > thanks,
>> > > > Bart
>> > > >
>> > > > https://esmiltania.be
>> > > > On Twitter 
>> > > > On Google+ 
>> >
>> >
>>
>>


Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-02 Thread bart deruyter
Thanks for looking into it.

Indeed, I installed it using synaptic.
Browsing in the ubuntu packages on:
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=focal=any=contents=lilyglyphs.sty
I don't find it either in 'focal', but I do find it in 'eoan'.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=eoan=any=contents=lilyglyphs.sty
There I read it should be in the texlive-music package.
Reading the description of 'texlive-music' in synaptic on my current system
(20.04 or focal) lilyglyphs.sty is not mentioned either.

https://esmiltania.be
On Twitter 
On Google+ 


Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:13 schreef Urs Liska :

> Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter <
> > > bart.deruy...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know
> > > > something.
> > > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a
> > > > luatex
> > > > file
> > > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
> > > >
> > > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
> > > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it
> > > > has
> > > > been
> > > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't
> > > > find
> > > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will
> > > investigate.
> >
> > How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The
> > versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live?
> >
> > I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual
> > packages did you install.
> > https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist
> > indicates
> > lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection.
> >
> > Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the
> > possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove
> > packages without warning/asking the maintainers first.
>
> I just had a closer look and found that
> a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs
> which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure,
> but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway.
>
> b)
> I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and
> Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list.
>
> Urs
>
> >
> > BestUrs
> >
> > > Urs
> > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Bart
> > > >
> > > > https://esmiltania.be
> > > > On Twitter 
> > > > On Google+ 
> >
> >
>
>


Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-02 Thread Urs Liska
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter <
> > bart.deruy...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi all,
> > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know
> > > something.
> > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a
> > > luatex
> > > file
> > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
> > > 
> > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
> > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it
> > > has
> > > been
> > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't
> > > find
> > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.
> > 
> > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will
> > investigate.
> 
> How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The
> versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live?
> 
> I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual
> packages did you install.
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist
> indicates
> lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection.
> 
> Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the
> possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove
> packages without warning/asking the maintainers first.

I just had a closer look and found that
a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs
which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure,
but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway.

b)
I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and
Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list.

Urs

> 
> BestUrs
> 
> > Urs
> > 
> > > thanks,
> > > Bart
> > > 
> > > https://esmiltania.be
> > > On Twitter 
> > > On Google+ 
> 
> 




Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-02 Thread Urs Liska
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> 
> Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter <
> bart.deruy...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know
> > something.
> > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a
> > luatex
> > file
> > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
> > 
> > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
> > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it has
> > been
> > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't find
> > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.
> 
> Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will
> investigate.

How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The
versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live?

I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual
packages did you install.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist indicates
lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection.

Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the
possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove
packages without warning/asking the maintainers first.

BestUrs

> 
> Urs
> 
> > thanks,
> > Bart
> > 
> > https://esmiltania.be
> > On Twitter 
> > On Google+ 




Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-02 Thread Urs Liska



Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter :
>Hi all,
>a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know something.
>I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a luatex
>file
>containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
>
>Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
>I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it has
>been
>removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't find
>anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.

Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will investigate.

Urs

>
>thanks,
>Bart
>
>https://esmiltania.be
>On Twitter 
>On Google+ 

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.