[LinPrj] r2l tarball 0.1.0: with refreshd

2001-09-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi folks A new version of the complete r2l package is here: 0.1.0 The main change is that the code for refreshd is in. I have not included Emil's biditext binary, as it seemed to me that it is simpler to do in a shell script (see my previous post), and anyway, it should be part of the existing b

Re: [LinPrj] r2l tarball 0.1.0: with refreshd

2001-09-10 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Hi Tzafrir, On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi folks > > A new version of the complete r2l package is here: 0.1.0 > > Emil: refreshd fails if BIDITEXT_FILENAME is not set. but you shouldn't > query the environment directly: you should ask r2llib what is the token > (as I did in t

Re: [LinPrj] r2l tarball 0.1.0: with refreshd

2001-09-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi Emil On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote: > Hi Tzafrir, > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > A new version of the complete r2l package is here: 0.1.0 > > > > > Emil: refreshd fails if BIDITEXT_FILENAME is not set. but you shouldn't > > query the environme

Re: [LinPrj] r2l tarball 0.1.0: with refreshd

2001-09-10 Thread Kohn Emil Dan
Hi Tzafrir, First, a question: Ignoring for a moment refreshd, do you want the biditext script to support the --r2l-filename option? On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi Emil > > > No. refreshd_hook.so shouldn't pass argv to r2l_init(). It is always run > from another process, wi