On 10 Sep 14, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> >
> > Yong Shen - is this patch faithful to the version released by Arjan?
>
> This looks like a modified verison of the patch which Arjan submitted
> upstream a while back, ie Nov 2009:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/43337
>
> Has there been
Hi there,
Well, I did not modify the content of the patch. It can be 'git am' on
ubuntu kernel without conflict.
This patch is directly from git://git.linaro.org/amitarora/powertop.git
commit cc1aaff10ee9046b835441d295fda498f68cb1ac
Author: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Jul 12 17:25:49 2010 -0400
Hi there,
rtpm_status_show() is still there in the code. You found that I removed the
rtpm_status_show() in the patch because that after back port, there are two
rtpm_status_show() in the code. So I removed one of them to resolve the
conflict.
Please look at patched source code.
Yong
On Wed, Sep
Hi Jesse,
Thanks for your point. I can confirm that the fbo extension is available
there for this functionality, and there is no such error messages when call
the same function in other clutk test cases. And yes, the run-time check
for the fbo capability is not implemented, it is assumed that thi
Jammy,
With respect to the CheckGLError assertion in test-clutk-perf, assuming
that glGetError is called per OpenGL entry point (i.e. you are not
seeing an error triggered by another call), the only way you should be
seeing an invalid operation when setting framebuffer binding(s) back to
the defau
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Is it intended that pre-release hwpacks will be long-lived? I expected
> > the same rules to apply as to pre-release images: ephemeral objects
> > used during development that would be replaced at release time by images
> > buil
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:14:04 -0700, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Is it intended that pre-release hwpacks will be long-lived? I expected the
> same rules to apply as to pre-release images: ephemeral objects used during
> development that would be replaced at release time by images built from the
> fi
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:11:05 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> When we discussed it on IRC the other day I thought we had consensus
> that we should do this more automatically, including all dependencies,
> and having a way to specify one or more packages as a "baseline" that
> can be assumed to be in
On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven
>
> PowerTOP wants to be able to show the user how effective the ALPM link
> power management is for the user. ALPM is worth around 0.5W on a quiet
> link; PowerTOP wants to be able to find cases where the "quiet link" isn
On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Arjan van de Ven
In order for PowerTOP to be able to report how well the new runtime PM is
working for the various drivers, the kernel needs to export some basic
statistics in sysfs.
This patch adds two sysfs files in the runtime PM doma
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:53:57 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, James Westby
> wrote:
> > Inclusion of dependencies isn't implemented yet, so these hwpacks aren't
> > going to be usable as snapshots we can come back to yet. If that's
> > really important then I can ha
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-13
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#W
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jammy Zhou wrote:
> >
> > Issues Fixed:
> > + Normalize clutter vetex positions to adapt to the vertex shader
> > + Use GL_TRIANGLE_FAN to implement original used GL_QUADS primitive,
> which
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jammy Zhou wrote:
>
> Issues Fixed:
> + Normalize clutter vetex positions to adapt to the vertex shader
> + Use GL_TRIANGLE_FAN to implement original used GL_QUADS primitive, which
> is not supported by gles2
> + Comment out cogl_flush() call in some functions (suc
Hi Sachin,
I have summarized current status of clutk porting below, and if you have
time, we can check the left issues together as we discussed in the conf-call
yesterday. I think the issue marked with yellow has highest priority
currently.
Branch:
+ https://code.launchpad.net/~jammy-zhou/clutk/g
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:11:19PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
>> A further thought occurred to me the other day.
>
>> I assume that we have to put the source packages in the hwpack too, for
>> at least the packages with some G
16 matches
Mail list logo
