Hi Ilias,
This is Joe Yu from ARM Shanghai. We're very interested in adding a TR
blueprint to Linaro 12.05 for a DirectFB project targeted at optimization for
ARM with Mali GPU and NEON. What shall we do? Shall we create a TR blueprint
ourselves at lanchpad? Could you please provide some direct
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:21:05 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Well, SQL isn't the right way to implement a queue in some ways, but I
> think we can make it work.
To be clear, I'm not saying we should stop modelling our job queue in
the database.
In other news, I found a nicely simple way o
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 08:18 AM, 함명주 wrote:
> Sender : Tushar Behera
> Date : 2011-06-21 12:38 (GMT+09:00)
>> Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialized in
>> max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through
>> regulator_register calls.
>>
>> To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_pr
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:56 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra
> wrote:
>> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
>>
>> Today, the builders are unstable. It requires:
>> 1. check the build status everyday as the notifications are broken.
>
> Notifi
Sender : Tushar Behera
Date : 2011-06-21 12:38 (GMT+09:00)
> Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialzed in
> max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through
> regulator_register calls.
>
> To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_probe, ramp_delay initialization
> code is moved before ca
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
>
> Today, the builders are unstable. It requires:
> 1. check the build status everyday as the notifications are broken.
Notifications are now working.
> I can live with this manual steps in
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
>> > great.
>> >
>> > Now, I am trying to c
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am compiling 11.05 release linux kernel using linaro gcc-4.5.1.
>
> Getting following errors:
>
> make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- -j 8
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> mak
This simple fault injection proved to be very useful to
test the error handling in the block.c rw_rq(). It may
still be useful to test if the host driver handle
pre_req() and post_req() correctly in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c| 54 +
Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
The execution flow looks like this:
The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
to the host and returns back to the mmc-queue. The mmc-queue calls
issue_rw_rq() again with a new request. This new request is prepared,
in isuue_rw_rq
Break out code without functional changes. This simplifies the code and
makes way for handle two parallel request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 244 +++---
1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driv
Add an additional mmc queue request instance to make way for
two active block requests. One request may be active while the
other request is being prepared.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 44 ++--
drivers/mmc/card/queue.h |3
Break out code from mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq to create a
block request prepare function. This doesn't change
any functionallity. This helps when handling more
than one active block request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 222 --
1
The way the request data is organized in the mmc queue struct
it only allows processing of one request at the time.
This patch adds a new struct to hold mmc queue request data such as
sg list, request, blk request and bounce buffers, and updates any functions
depending on the mmc queue struct. This
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request()
dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer.
It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req()
post_req() must be to be called as well.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
dri
Add four tests for read and write performance per
different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
* Read using blocking mmc request
* Read using non-blocking mmc request
* Write using blocking mmc request
* Write using non-blocking mmc request
The host dirver must support pre_req() and post_req()
in order
Add a debugfs file "testlist" to print all available tests
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 39 ++-
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
index 233
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() and prepares the dma descriptor
for the next mmc data transfer. post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before mmci_request(), mmci_request()
will prepare the cache and dma just like it did it before.
It is optional to use pre_req() and post_req() for mmci
How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
cost for handling the caches have increased and is now a bottle neck
Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
* mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting
If there is on ongoing request wait for completion
of that request and start the new one and return.
Does not wait for the n
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:17:41 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki
wrote:
> W dniu 21.06.2011 07:30, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze:
> > Hi guys (who else should I be emailing this sort of thing to?),
> >
> > After making rapid progress on the scheduler last week, today I've hit a
> > bit of a stumbling block. Ba
On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that
>> different vendors may attribute different meaning to these fields if
>> they wish. Does that mean this should be a platform_*() fu
On 21 June 2011 14:10, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Frans is going to work to pull these together. There's a BP at:
>>
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-connect-android-build-to-lava
>>
>> -Zach
>>
>
On 20 June 2011 17:17, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
>> The execution flow looks like this:
>> The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
>> to the host and returns back to the m
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 21:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> >
> >> On 21 June 2011 07:41, Kishore Kadiyala
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> +
> >> >> +static void omap_hsmmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct
> >> >> mmc
On 21 June 2011 21:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> On 21 June 2011 07:41, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +static void omap_hsmmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request
>> >> *mrq,
>> >> + bool is_firs
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-wm8974.ko]
> > undefined!
> > ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-wm8940.ko]
> > undefined!
> > ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod"
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 07:41, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
> >
> >
> >> +
> >> +static void omap_hsmmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request
> >> *mrq,
> >> + bool is_first_req)
> >
> > I don't see the usage of "is_first_req"
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Frans is going to work to pull these together. There's a BP at:
>
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-connect-android-build-to-lava
>
> -Zach
>
> On 20 June 2011 18:47, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>
> >>
Hi Dave,
Thanks for reporting it. This was fallout from when IS restarted the
machine to add more disk, and they're working on it right now. It should
be fixed RSN.
Cheers,
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:10 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Login on patches.linaro.org appears broken. When I
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:31 AM, David Long wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> WRT to .dtb files: I see sources in the kernel tree but they don't appear to
> be built as part of the kernel build. How are these produced and how can I
> build a modified one for some testing?
Nicolas' linaro-2.6.39 tree has th
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:47:04 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Is being able to externally specify the job/test identifier a
> requirement?
Not from the build service's point of view.
It makes it easier right now as currently there isn't somewhere for us
to store the LAVA id we would get bac
Hi there,
Login on patches.linaro.org appears broken. When I try to log in, I get this:
OpenID failed
OpenID discovery error: Error fetching XRDS document: (28, 'connect()
timed out!')
This has been happening for about 2 days, but it was working prior to that.
Cheers
---Dave
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:24:19AM -0500, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 01:44 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
> >> great.
> >>
> >> Now, I am trying to compil
On 06/21/2011 08:29 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
>> On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:
> -Original Message-
> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Miao
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 5:52 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu); eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Cozens; linaro-
> d...@lists.linaro.org; Mark Brown; Dajun Chen;
Hi Per,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 07:41, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +static void omap_hsmmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request
>>> *mrq,
>>> + bool is_first_req)
>>
>> I don't see the usage of "
Hi Per,
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
enum mmc_blk_status {
MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
+ MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
MMC_BLK_RETRY,
MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
On 06/21/2011 03:09 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we
can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 07:29 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> > On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > > On Tuesda
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
>>
On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
>>> > > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have booted panda board using 11.0
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Ashish Jangam
wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
>> Miao
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 5:52 PM
>> To: Ashish Jangam
>> Cc: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu); eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Coz
On 06/21/2011 01:44 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
>> great.
>>
>> Now, I am trying to compile the kernel myself. I am using the sources
>> from tarball provided on 11.
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we
> > can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get
> > this done?
>
> H
Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
The execution flow looks like this:
The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
to the host and returns back to the mmc-queue. The mmc-queue calls
issue_rw_rq() again with a new request. This new request is prepared,
in isuue_rw_rq
Break out code from mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq to create a
block request prepare function. This doesn't change
any functionallity. This helps when handling more
than one active block request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 170 -
1
This simple fault injection proved to be very useful to
test the error handling in the block.c rw_rq(). It may
still be useful to test if the host driver handle
pre_req() and post_req() correctly in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c| 54 +
Add an additional mmc queue request instance to make way for
two active block requests. One request may be active while the
other request is being prepared.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 44 ++--
drivers/mmc/card/queue.h |3
Break out code without functional changes. This simplifies the code and
makes way for handle two parallel request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 226 +++---
1 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drive
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request()
dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer.
It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req()
post_req() must be to be called as well.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
dri
** Rebased and verified patchset on linux-linaro-2.6.39 **
This patchset needs this commit to be merged in linux-linaro-2.6.39
in order to apply.
commit 473ba41dcc70a7977031db7fcbc5638097ca6a3a
Author: Andrei Warkentin
Date: Mon Apr 11 18:10:24 2011 -0500
Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
* mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting
If there is on ongoing request wait for completion
of that request and start the new one and return.
Does not wait for the n
The way the request data is organized in the mmc queue struct
it only allows processing of one request at the time.
This patch adds a new struct to hold mmc queue request data such as
sg list, request, blk request and bounce buffers, and updates any functions
depending on the mmc queue struct. This
Add a debugfs file "testlist" to print all available tests
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 39 ++-
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
index abc
Add four tests for read and write performance per
different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
* Read using blocking mmc request
* Read using non-blocking mmc request
* Write using blocking mmc request
* Write using non-blocking mmc request
The host dirver must support pre_req() and post_req()
in order
pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() and prepares the dma descriptor
for the next mmc data transfer. post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
If not calling pre_req() before mmci_request(), mmci_request()
will prepare the cache and dma just like it did it before.
It is optional to use pre_req() and post_req() for mmci
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ashish Jangam
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
>> Miao
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:28 PM
>> To: Ashish Jangam; Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
>> Cc: eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Cozen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 June 2011 16:10, James Westby wrote:
>> Hi Fathi,
>>
>> Given the results of last week's weekly testing, do you think we should
>> now flip the switch to move to using the images built by
>> ubuntu-build.linaro.org (offspring.li
> -Original Message-
> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Miao
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:28 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam; Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
> Cc: eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Cozens; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Mark
> Brown; Dajun Chen; Pra
On 20 June 2011 22:25, Grant Likely wrote:
>> +
>> +static const struct of_dev_auxdata exynos4_auxdata_lookup[] __initconst = {
>> + OF_DEV_AUXDATA("samsung,s3c-sdhci", EXYNOS4_PA_HSMMC(2),
>> + "s3c-sdhci.2", &s3c_hsmmc2_def_platdata),
>> + OF_DEV_AUXD
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:43:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> I think I've commented on this before, but I do try to avoid direct
> coding registers into the DT. That said, sometimes there really isn't
> a nice human-friendly way of encoding things and direct register
> values is the best appro
Hi Grant,
On 20 June 2011 22:13, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> For custom properties, you should prefix the property name with 'samsung,'.
>
> This looks very much like directly encoding the Linux flags into the
> device tree. The binding should be completely contained within
> itself, and not refer t
Hi Grant,
On 20 June 2011 21:24, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Thomas Abraham
> wrote:
>> The driver depends on pdev->dev.platform_data to retrive information
>> about the platform data even after the initialization. To add device
>> tree support, this has to be changed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:08:59AM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Currently, ramp_delay variable is used uninitialzed in
> max8997_set_voltage_ldobuck which gets called through
> regulator_register calls.
> To fix the problem, in max8997_pmic_probe, ramp_delay initialization
> code is moved before
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ashish Jangam
> wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I recently saw your mail to Dajun, on your people eagerness to get the
>> patches upstream soon. We also hold the same vision to get the patches
>> upstream as quick as
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Ashish Jangam
wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I recently saw your mail to Dajun, on your people eagerness to get the
> patches upstream soon. We also hold the same vision to get the patches
> upstream as quick as possible.
>
> In this regard we like to have a discussion so
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
> > > great.
> > >
> > > Now,
Hi Arnd,
These are a number of trivial-and-simple patches that have been reviewed on
the LAKML mailing list. They are independent patches that are mostly
self-descriptive.
The clock added for TWD play with a patch that will be merged out-of-order
with this one, that makes the timer core reschedul
On 21 June 2011 10:09, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 09:53, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:17:26PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
>>
>> Per,
>>
>> Can you measure how much difference this has before and afte
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we
can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get
this done?
Hi Guilherme,
I have no problem to use powerdebug to validate this approach.
Di
Hi,
On 20 June 2011 16:10, James Westby wrote:
> Hi Fathi,
>
> Given the results of last week's weekly testing, do you think we should
> now flip the switch to move to using the images built by
> ubuntu-build.linaro.org (offspring.linaro.org as was)?
I tend to say -1.
> If not, what are the blo
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.h b/powerdebug.h
index 73e3581..01b22ba 100644
--- a/powerdebug.h
+++ b/powerdebug.h
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@
* - initial API and implementation
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
display.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/display.c b/display.c
index 8f442c1..0cfbf94 100644
--- a/display.c
+++ b/display.c
@@ -472,6 +472,9 @@ static int display_find_keystroke(int fd, void *data)
if (
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:52 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
>>> great.
>>>
>>> Now, I am trying to compile
Hi Eric,
I recently saw your mail to Dajun, on your people eagerness to get the patches
upstream soon. We also hold the same vision to get the patches upstream as
quick as possible.
In this regard we like to have a discussion so please let us know your
convenient time. Please note that as of n
Hi Doug,
Some comments below.
Best regards,
Arvind
>-Original Message-
>From: Deao, Douglas [mailto:d-d...@ti.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 5:44 AM
>To: Arvind Chauhan; Philippe Langlais; Linus Walleij; Lee Jones
>Cc: Michael Hope; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org;
>pierre.peif...@steric
W dniu 21.06.2011 07:30, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze:
Hi guys (who else should I be emailing this sort of thing to?),
After making rapid progress on the scheduler last week, today I've hit a
bit of a stumbling block. Basically, we're implementing a queue in SQL
with this sort of pseudo-code:
On 21 June 2011 09:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:17:26PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
>> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
>
> Per,
>
> Can you measure how much difference this has before and after your
> patch set please?
Absolutely, I can run the
Hi,
As stated by Douglas, a character driver is more natural for a printf like
usage,
therefore we need a mean to do packetizing (with optional OST header: can be
supported by generic functions in kernel hw tracing framework).
My current implementation use only one device node (/dev/stm) for all S
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:17:26PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
Per,
Can you measure how much difference this has before and after your
patch set please? This moves the dsb() out of the individual cache
maintanence functions, such that we will on
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have booted panda board using 11.05 natty release of ubuntu. It worked
> > great.
> >
> > Now, I am trying to compile the kernel myself. I am using the sources
> > from tar
On 19 June 2011 23:17, Per Forlin wrote:
> Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
> The execution flow looks like this:
> The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
> to the host and returns back to the mmc-queue. The mmc-queue calls
> issue_rw_rq() again with a new r
On 21 June 2011 08:40, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 20 June 2011 17:17, Kishore Kadiyala wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
>>> The execution flow looks like this:
>>> The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the
84 matches
Mail list logo
