Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework

2011-12-05 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi Russell, On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:20:50PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: 1. When a clock user calls clk_enable() on a clock, the clock framework should prevent other users of the clock from changing the clock's rate. This should

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework

2011-12-05 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:23:06PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:13:10AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: Hi Russell, On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:20:50PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: 1. When

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Kito Cheng
Here is some triky way for this problem, you can put the constructor and destructor to the source file which contain necessary function call in your libraries to enforce the linker to archive your constructor and destructor. However if this solution is not work for your situation, you can apply

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Thomas Abraham
Hi Mark, On 4 December 2011 21:24, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 06:51:23PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: For regulators that are not turned on by bootloader, and which require 'apply_uV' constraint, is there any alternative for turning on the

Re: For the device tree topic, is there anything I can do in the 11.12 (28th November 2011 - 18th November 2011)?

2011-12-05 Thread Eric Miao
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Botao Sun botao@linaro.org wrote: Hi Angus Grant, Because the Linaro Android 11.11 release has been done successfully, I have some time to continue to work on device tree topic, here is my blue print for it:

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:40:50PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 4 December 2011 21:24, Mark Brown If the regulator isn't software managed then always_on covers this - the regulator core will enable any always_on regulators that haven't been enabled already. Thanks for the hint. I was

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 5 December 2011 16:04, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:40:50PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 4 December 2011 21:24, Mark Brown If the regulator isn't software managed then always_on covers this - the regulator core will enable any

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:14:40PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 5 December 2011 16:04, Mark Brown With the regulator device tree bindings if the regulator is configured to run a single voltage the bindings will set apply_uV unconditionally so there's no need for a separate constraint.

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Thomas Abraham
On 5 December 2011 16:27, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:14:40PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 5 December 2011 16:04, Mark Brown With the regulator device tree bindings if the regulator is configured to run a single voltage the bindings

LAVA upgrade and deployment change

2011-12-05 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
Hi LAVA users, The Linaro Validation Team is preparing to change the way we deploy LAVA in production.  We expect this will require 1 hour of downtime or less on Monday beginning at 22:00 UTC. This upgrade will streamline our deployment process, allowing us to deploy changes more frequently and 

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Mans Rullgard
On 4 December 2011 17:40, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: I probably know the answer to this already but ... For shared libs one can define and use something like: void __attribute__ ((constructor)) my_init(void); void __attribute__ ((destructor)) my_fini(void); Which of course allows

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Dave Martin
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: I probably know the answer to this already but ... For shared libs one can define and use something like: void __attribute__ ((constructor)) my_init(void); void __attribute__ ((destructor)) my_fini(void); Which of

Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v8

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:16:24PM +0530, ashishj3 wrote: --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ static irqreturn_t regmap_irq_thread(int irq, void *d) * irq: The IRQ the device uses to signal interrupts * irq_flags: The

Re: Proposal : New Linaro Desktop Wallpaper

2011-12-05 Thread Dave Martin
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:35:19AM -0600, Andy Doan wrote: On 12/02/2011 04:55 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@linaro.org mailto:riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote: On 2 December 2011 00:56, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: For shared libs one can define and use something like: void __attribute__ ((constructor)) my_init(void); void __attribute__ ((destructor)) my_fini(void); Which of course allows your lib to run code just after the library is loaded and just before the

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org writes: Another way of doing a similar thing is to mark __mylib_constructor as undefined in all the objects that make up the library. Unfortunately, there seems to be no obvious way of doing that: the assembler generates undefined symbol references

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org writes: Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org writes: Another way of doing a similar thing is to mark __mylib_constructor as undefined in all the objects that make up the library. Unfortunately, there seems to be no obvious way of doing that: the

Fwd: [REMINDER] Linaro 11.11 release dates and deliveries

2011-12-05 Thread David Zinman
-- Forwarded message -- From: David Zinman david.zin...@linaro.org Date: 14 November 2011 13:36 Subject: [REMINDER] Linaro 11.11 release dates and deliveries To: linaro-dev linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Proj Mgmt Mailing List linaro-project-managem...@lists.launchpad.net, Tech Leads

[REMINDER] Linaro 11.12 release dates and deliveries

2011-12-05 Thread David Zinman
Please disregard previous draft a few minutes ago, it was sent in error. Greetings, This is a mail sent to remind you the coming release dates:  * Linaro 11.12 Toolchain WG release December 8, 2011.  * Linaro 11.12 Platform/WGs/LTs is December 15, 2011. * Linaro 11.12 Release Candidate is

Register Now For Linaro Connect Q1.12

2011-12-05 Thread Stephen Doel
Hi All, I'm delighted to announce that our new and improved** registration process for Linaro Connect Q1.12 is now open. As a reminder, the event will be held from 6 - 10 February at the Sofitel Hotel, Redwood City, CA and will be themed around the roadmap set by Linaro Members with a focus on

Re: Proposal : New Linaro Desktop Wallpaper

2011-12-05 Thread Steve Taylor
Tom and all, Thank you all for your input on the desktop background images and thanks especially to Tom for generating the original images. I am trying to copy all the people that may have been involved in the various threads about this. As many of you know, I have been looking to get images

Re: Static Library startup

2011-12-05 Thread Dave Martin
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:47:08PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org writes: Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org writes: Another way of doing a similar thing is to mark __mylib_constructor as undefined in all the objects that make up the library.

Re: Proposal : New Linaro Desktop Wallpaper

2011-12-05 Thread Tom Gall
Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply. On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Steve Taylor steve.tay...@linaro.org wrote: Tom and all, Thank you all for your input on the desktop background images and thanks especially to Tom for generating the original images. I am trying to copy all the people that

Re: Android Build seeded builds report

2011-12-05 Thread Zach Pfeffer
Thanks for the great work and article Paul. Seeded builds have had a transformative effect on our productivity! On 1 December 2011 09:46, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote: Hello, We launched seeded builds on Linaro Android Build System (https://android-build.linaro.org) more

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework

2011-12-05 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi a brief comment concerning clock rates: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Mike Turquette wrote: +unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk) ... +long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) ... +int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) ... +struct clk { ... +

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework

2011-12-05 Thread Turquette, Mike
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com wrote: +/** + * clk_get_parent - return the parent of a clk + * @clk: the clk whose parent gets returned + * + * Simply returns clk-parent.  It is up to the caller to hold the + * prepare_lock, if desired.  Returns NULL if clk

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework

2011-12-05 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: The types associated with clock rates in the clock interface (include/linux/clk.h) are inconsistent, and we should fix this. Rubbish. They're different with good reason. Rates are primerily unsigned quantities - and should be

Re: [PATCH] thermal: Add anatop thermal driver

2011-12-05 Thread Rob Lee
Hey Paul, I'm already working on upstreaming a thermal driver for i.MX6. I'm currently on hold paused to upstream cpufreq for i.MX6 and do some cpuidle work but I predict that I'll be ready to submit a first version sometime next week. For all things power management related on i.MX(cpufreq,

Re: LAVA upgrade and deployment change

2011-12-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:04:26 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org wrote: Hi LAVA users, The Linaro Validation Team is preparing to change the way we deploy LAVA in production.  We expect this will require 1 hour of downtime or less on Monday beginning at 22:00 UTC. This

Re: LAVA upgrade and deployment change

2011-12-05 Thread Paul Larson
Great work, many thanks for moving this along! This should help us streamline the process, and also make it easier to set up production as well as testing environments. Thanks, Paul Larson On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec

Linaro 11.12 Preview Release Candidate 2 Out

2011-12-05 Thread Zach Pfeffer
All, I've gotten together preview releases, all running ICS, all unaccelerated (working on it). Enjoy! Instructions for how to use each build are listed on the build pages. The tests that are running and pass are listed below the build sites. As always, feel free to email/Tweet/G+/FB/IRC at

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2011-12-05 Thread Rajendra Nayak
On Monday 05 December 2011 04:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:14:40PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: On 5 December 2011 16:04, Mark Brown With the regulator device tree bindings if the regulator is configured to run a single voltage the bindings will set apply_uV