in Android ICS toolchain.
Can any toolchain hacker take a look at this issue?
Thanks,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
cases.
Sincerely,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
[*] https://launchpad.net/glmark2
2010/8/18 Jim Huang js...@0xlab.org:
Hello list,
We are proud to announce the release of 0xBench, an open source
Android benchmarking app developed by 0xlab.
0xBench comes with several built-in benchmarks
2011/9/3 Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org:
Is a method via the aux vectors to know at runtime if neon is or is
not present?
hi Tom,
Did you mean this?
https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12448
Regards,
-jserv
___
linaro-dev mailing list
2011/9/3 Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
I'd like you to meet Jim who did the initial hardfloat work. This
email contains the results that Jim produced.
Hmm, but the email seems to not actually contain a hard-float run. Or
Hello list,
0xlab announced the new system testing utility for Android.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kan-Ru Chen ka...@0xlab.org
Date: 2011/8/24
Subject: [0xlab-discuss] [ANN] ASTER System Testing Environment and Runtime
To: 0xlab-disc...@googlegroups.com
Hi everyone,
I am
2011/8/22 Bernhard Rosenkranzer bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org:
On 21 August 2011 15:00, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry, silly question, but does Android use the glibc dynamic linker?
No, they really like reinventing the wheel. Bionic comes with its own
dynamic linker.
2011/8/17 Frans Gifford frans.giff...@linaro.org:
Hi Mathieu,
I think 0xdroid has ethernet support (I'm sure jserv could confirm).
Did Movial get it from there?
hi Frans and Mathieu,
I think both Movial and 0xdroid have similar Ethernet implementations
since android-x86 project originally
2011/8/11 Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org:
Ramin,
Thanks for the email. I've added linaro-dev to my response.
hi Ramin and Zach,
The demo consisted of two identical PandaBoards with identical SD
cards running the 3D benchmark of 0xbench using software 3D to amplify
compiler and kernel
2011/8/10 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org:
. Would you be interested in adding a Firefox-based benchmark? As a large
application it is a good testbed for LTO, FDO and other aggressive
optimizations.
I would be interested in hearing how you get on with LTO and FDO on
ARM.
to write Gtk+ front-end is simplifying
the details of the showcase and even making it visualized for LAVA.
By the way, thank Validation team to bring it to the world. :)
Sincerely,
-jserv
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
During the first week of June, we prepared
Merged in AOSP:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/bionic.git;a=commitdiff;h=e6cff939e603e445c2576958c3777d7b7f5d84fa
On 22 June 2011 16:48, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23997
Hello list,
During the first week of June, we prepared the technical showcase[1]
about Linaro powered devices and projects including LAVA[1].
To emphasize how LAVA works, we just uploaded another demo video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3dT68MOzz0
It starts at 2:27.
Sincerely,
-jserv
Merged in AOSP:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=toolchain/build.git;a=commit;h=7ee395d10100fc9ed2c03c49b949033600082a4f
On 27 May 2011 01:29, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
While executing target install-host-libbfd, the build system complains:
make -C libbfd-binutils-2.20.1/bfd
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23997
From afd989ca9f3415df9807847745e854522866f66f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:35:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] strftime: Use snprintf() instead of sprintf()
Change-Id
Quote from Linux Programmer's Manual:
If t is non-NULL, the return value is also stored in the memory
pointed to by t.
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23998
From 30a19b9cdbe509d62c7d4c5df9a6daab13ff8857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date
with the licensing terms of GNU GPL. But, after checking the
source files (*.[ch]), no license term is claimed.[3] The proper
declaration should put file MODULE_LICENSE_GPL into individual
directories at least.
Is my understanding correct?
Sincerely,
Jim Huang
Android Team, Linaro
[1] https://launchpad.net
On 9 June 2011 17:58, Kan-Ru Chen ka...@0xlab.org wrote:
After resume the HDMI/DVI output was still blank. It turns out that
framebuffers have to be reconfigured so the output is activated again.
Hi Andy,
Can you review Kan-Ru's patch? Since Android assumes full-functional
PM, it is vital to
On 10 June 2011 00:08, Ken Werner ken.wer...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there,
I've got an android build system up and running and had a quick look into
this. When using the gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.05-0 the bootanimation runs forever
when compiling the libgui.so using -O[s|1|2]. For me it only works
Hello list,
If you build Android using gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.05 [1], you will
encounter a problem that bootanimation shows endless. It results from
the mis-optimization in libgui, which handles the operations in
Android SensorManager.
To work around this problem, you can apply the following
While executing target install-host-libbfd, the build system complains:
make -C libbfd-binutils-2.20.1/bfd install \
bfdlibdir=/tmp/android-toolchain-eabi/lib
bfdincludedir=/tmp/android-toolchain-eabi/include \ -m 644
libbfd-binutils-2.20.1/intl/libintl.a \ /tmp/android-toolchain-eabi/lib
\ -m
On 23 May 2011 16:54, Patrik Ryd patrik@linaro.org wrote:
The file init.ompa4.sh only contained one line for setting
ro.runtime.device. This property is not used so the file
can be removed.
hi Patrik,
Thanks for cleaning up. It looks great to me.
So, we are going to be more consistent
Otherwise, some applications which expect touchscreen device would crash
due to lacking of related resources.
This change is essential to LEB.
---
tasks/fake-ts/Android.mk | 29 +
tasks/fake-ts/fake-ts.c | 76 ++
2 files changed,
3.08840 88 0 15000 1024
The work was derived from ARM Ltd, contributed to newlib, and reworked
for Android by Linaro.
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,22419
From f50e9be5930a08fa825b0c23353c802e11369b14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date: Wed
-integration
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-google-benchmark-suite
Sincerely,
Jim Huang,
Android platform team,
Linaro
[1] http://www.linaro.org/
[2] https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain
[3] Linaro uses the same toolchain benchmark as Google compiler team
On 21 April 2011 05:54, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Jim. Good effort. The Android patch set will be included in
gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.04 which is due out today.
hi Michael,
Thanks!
Look forward to new release.
We need to discuss toolchain build scripts at the summit.
On 19 April 2011 14:28, Amit Pundir pundira...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer pfeff...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be very nice. There's actually some documentation in u-boot
about fastboot
The following set of Android bionic patches use GCC visibility pragma
to hide the private symbols in bionic. It also lets the optimizer
produce better and smaller machine code.
[PATCH android/bionic 1/3] Hide private symbols using GCC visibility pragma
[PATCH android/bionic 2/3] Hide internal
/passion/system/lib/libc.so
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,17361
From 74015f0fe72daf8e007298975d6415e0e9ee5e47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 04:28:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Hide private symbols using GCC visibility pragma
__bionic_brk was shared by brk() and sbrk(), which should be implementor
specific and hidden to application developers.
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,17364
From 7452bce8defc06a34612b25ace2ef802c0579a83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date
331af85e9694c4c9247e39716f97ede1a62ee9ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:02:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Hide libm private symbols using GCC visibility pragma
Following the visibility changes in libc.so, this patch attempts to hide
private symbols in libm.so.
Reference
On 18 April 2011 14:40, patrik@linaro.org wrote:
From: Patrik Ryd patrik@linaro.org
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
---
tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
hi Patrik,
Does this imply that we requires
On 18 April 2011 21:01, Zach Pfeffer pfeff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 April 2011 14:40, patrik@linaro.org wrote:
From: Patrik Ryd patrik@linaro.org
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage
On 29 March 2011 06:34, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
GCC 4.5 and up supports graphite optimization, and cloog and ppl
are required. This change attempts to support some combinations
of ppl and cloog/cloog-ppl libraries. Since cloog and ppl are
written in C++, it implies we might
Previously, the optimized asm option is only enabled when
__ARM_ARCH_5E__ is defined, which is assigned in armv5te.mk
rather than armv7-a series targets. This patch checks the ARM CPU
feature about half-word multiply instructions to enable ARMv5TE
resampler optimization routines properly.
Code
On 30 March 2011 15:07, Luse Cheng l...@0xlab.org wrote:
Integrate Linaro-GDB in Android toolchain build system
---
linaro-build.sh | 126
++
1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Thanks! Merged in Linaro HEAD.
On 6 April 2011 01:08, Patrik Ryd patrik@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I will push some patches for review. They are all for Android.
hi Patrik,
Great work!
For the blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-platform-kernel-boottarball.
I have had problems
On 16 March 2011 13:16, Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
Change-Id: I39652f14b362c42ebc2ceb37952d8e57cf89692c
---
opensles/libopensles/Android.mk | 2 +-
opensles/libopensles/IAndroidEffect.c | 130
On 28 March 2011 05:09, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there. I'm looking for areas where the toolchain could generate
faster code, and a good way of doing that is seeing how compiled code
does against the best hand-written code. I know of skia, ffmpeg,
pixman, Orc, and efl -
On 24 March 2011 01:03, Jeremy Chang jeremy.ch...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
Hi, Patrik,
How should I add the linaro copyright? like below line?
# Copyright (C) 2011 Linaro - http://linaro.org
hi Jeremy,
Please check the text description:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Copyright
Regards,
On 22 March 2011 06:47, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Jeremy Chang jeremy.ch...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
+dev_mount sdcard /mnt/sdcard 7
/devices/platform/mmci-omap-hs.0/mmc_host/mmc0
from what i understand this hardcodes that our sdcard partition is
On 17 March 2011 23:35, Patrik Ryd patrik@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I think your patches are good enough (now after the review) to start pushing
them to a toolchain_preview branch. That way people can use
the toolchain_preview branch when working with the toolchain.
At the same time someone
On 18 March 2011 23:37, Jesse Barker jesse.bar...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi all,
Thought this might be of interest to folks.
On 15 March 2011 16:29, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jeremy Chang jeremy.ch...@linaro.org wrote:
All partitions from mmc is expected.
This depends on Jim Huang's patch init: support mmc device mount in
android/system/core to work.
what happened with
On 8 March 2011 02:37, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
I just updated wiki page about Google's compiler benchmark suite:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/UpstreamToolchain
Please check the section, Evaluate Benchmark suite.
Through adb[1], it is highly convenient to bench
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Meng-Hsuan Cheng l...@0xlab.org wrote:
Add linaro-build.sh to support linaro android toolchain.
Merged (along with slight syntax tweak) in GIT:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=android/platform/build.git;a=summary
Thanks for your contribution.
Sincerely,
-jserv
On 2 March 2011 09:51, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
The skia maintainer, Mike Reed, made two branches: one is hosted in
Google Code, and another is
inside Android source tree:
http
On 1 March 2011 18:07, Andrew Stubbs andrew.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions
On 28 February 2011 20:33, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
Is there something like a network management service/framework in
android that could be improved to also consider LAN to achieve
always-online? I assume it currently reacts on wifi or 3g signal
becoming available/going away.
hi
init.rc usage example:
mount vfat mmc@blk1p3 /mnt/sdcard2
---
init/builtins.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/builtins.c b/init/builtins.c
index e0ccf9f..32d9d7f 100644
--- a/init/builtins.c
+++ b/init/builtins.c
@@ -356,6 +356,16 @@ int
On 23 February 2011 20:58, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
init.rc usage example:
mount vfat mmc@blk1p3 /mnt/sdcard2
this feels like a weird split of the device name with mmc before and
blk1 after
be verified
one moth after Android public release.
Sincerely,
Jim Huang (jserv)
[1] http://developer.android.com/sdk/ndk/index.html
[2] http://android.git.kernel.org/
[3]
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=toolchain/gcc.git;a=commit;h=b094d6c4bf572654a031ecc4afe675154c886dc5
[4] Smaller and Faster
2011/2/21 Jason Kridner jkrid...@beagleboard.org:
How about putting it inside the [PATCH xxx], ie. [PATCH v3 android]
device/linaro/beagleboard: Install 0xbench native applications? When
I go to git.linaro.org, this would give me enough information to
figure out to which tree this patch
2011/2/20 Jason Kridner jkrid...@beagleboard.org:
Am I the only one for which the word android before device in the subject
would really help?
hi Jason,
I agree with you. However, if we do git am the patch with subject
prefixing android: , every git
log would start with android: , right?
.
Sincerely,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
blueprint or
wiki spec for it?
Yes, it would be great.
Cheers,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
be refined into adb extension as the
part of LAVA client framework.
That's all. It could be straightforward and transparent.
Any suggestion is appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
[1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/LAVA/Architecture
[2
://android.git.kernel.org/?p=toolchain/binutils.git;a=summary
Since binutils is not yet maintained by Linaro directly, Android WG
would just take binutils 2.20.1 from Google.
Sincerely,
Jim Huang (jserv)
http://0xlab.org/
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev
57 matches
Mail list logo
