Re: JITs and 52-bit VA

On 28 April 2016 at 14:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > One simple (from the kernel's perspective, not from the JIT) approach > might be to always use MAP_FIXED whenever an allocation is made for > memory that needs these special pointers, and then manage the available > address space

Re: beagle xm upstreaming question

On 1 November 2014 23:15, Ben Gras b...@shrike-systems.com wrote: My question is: is Linaro planning to upstream the bbxm code to stock qemu? Having a single qemu would simplify life for us. Upstreaming that code is something we would in theory like to do, but it is quite a lot of work

Re: beagle xm upstreaming question

On 2 November 2014 13:34, Ben Gras b...@shrike-systems.com wrote: A few months of work sounds like a bit much to take on as a side project at this point, and I have a few already, so no promises. But I am interested in hearing where the first thread is to start pulling at, so to speak. The

Re: [PATCH] configs: android: Enable SELinux related configs

On 17 June 2014 15:07, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: Yes, it's damned annoying as we've found out in the past, but I believe it's a 'feature', a per subscriber option unless I've got mixed up... Avoid duplicate copies of messages? When you are listed explicitly

Re: TianoCore KVM Port: Status Update

On 1 April 2014 01:35, Michael Casadevall michael.casadev...@linaro.org wrote: Its a fairly major improvement, and I managed to use GdbSyms.dll to load ALL the symbol files in a single go, but I'm still having issues with the stack. At least now i can get the frame we're currently in reliably,

Re: TianoCore KVM Port: Status Update

On 31 March 2014 23:07, Michael Casadevall michael.casadev...@linaro.org wrote: On 03/28/2014 07:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: There's a bug in QEMU's AArch64 KVM support which means we don't do the right thing with SP on syncing state to/from the kernel, so don't trust that (Fixed either

Re: TianoCore KVM Port: Status Update

On 28 March 2014 19:38, Michael Casadevall michael.casadev...@linaro.org wrote: On 03/28/2014 02:09 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 04:26:59AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: Previous attempts to debug assets shows that EFI does odd things to the stack when we hit an

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 27 February 2014 13:20, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Dann Frazier wrote: I've narrowed down the changes that seem to prevent both types of segfaults to the following changes that introduce a wrapper around sigprocmask:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 10 March 2014 11:28, Alex Bennée alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes: On 9 March 2014 23:37, Dann Frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com wrote: Also - I've found an issue with running OpenJDK in the latest upstream git: root@server-75e0210e-4f99-4c86

Re: qemu crash

On 10 March 2014 19:15, Daniel Lipsitt d...@typeamachines.com wrote: On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: Well, highbank does not support SD, but that's not your issue. Where's your dtb and kernel? It's inside the pre-built image here:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 9 March 2014 23:37, Dann Frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com wrote: Also - I've found an issue with running OpenJDK in the latest upstream git: root@server-75e0210e-4f99-4c86-9277-3201ab7b6afd:/root# java # [thread 274902467056 also had an error]# A fatal error has been detected by the

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 28 February 2014 14:12, Alex Bennée alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote: Is this simply a case of having a precise state in/around syscalls? No. AIUI we already have such a mechanism for dealing with faults in translated code so this is all aimed at when an asynchronous signal arrives somewhere

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 28 February 2014 14:27, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote: Could we check the instruction at the sognaling pc and check if it's a known syscall instruction? No need to replace glibc wrappers then. No, because the behaviour we want for started handling syscall in qemu through to PC anything

Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation

On 25 February 2014 13:33, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote The biggest road-block is that signal vs syscall handling is fundamentally broken in linux-user and it's unfixable without assembler implementations of the syscall caller. I'm not entirely sure it's possible to fix even with

Re: Anyone using virtio on armv7?

On 6 January 2014 19:46, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote: Hello, I'm trying to fire up an ARM fastmodel using a virtio block device rather than the emulated MMC block device. UEFI is reading the kernel DTB off the virtio device, so I know the device is present. So far, I don't

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 28 November 2013 07:54, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote: On 27 November 2013 19:13, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: Christopher is advocating that somebody should fix the boot wrapper, so you have a single trivial .axf file which doesn't include the kernel at all I

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 27 November 2013 15:07, Christopher Covington c...@codeaurora.org wrote: Are there instructions for running this stuff on QEMU? There's no 64 bit system emulation support in QEMU just yet, so the first item in the instructions is 1. wait until end of Q1 2014 :-) By the way I find the

Re: Ubuntu-based image for use with foundation model

On 27 November 2013 18:27, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: +++ Christopher Covington [2013-11-27 11:17 -0500]: In my opinion, the nicer solution is to port the semihosting boot wrapper to 64-bit. We've done that internally, but don't currently have approval to share that work. It's not too

Re: [PATCH] target-arm: add support for v8 AES instructions

On 6 November 2013 11:22, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: This adds support for the AESE/AESD/AESMC/AESIMC instructions that are available on some v8 implementations of Aarch32. Thanks for this patch. Please could you send QEMU patches to qemu-de...@nongnu.org? (we do all our

Re: [PATCH] target-arm: add support for v8 AES instructions

On 6 November 2013 13:05, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: Well, to be honest, my primary motivation for posting it to the list was so I could refer to it from the JIRA issue you told me about yesterday, but I would be happy to fix these minor issues and do a proper submission

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

On 8 August 2013 03:44, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: These patches give accurate, monotonic timestamps from the very first log entry allowing insight into where the time is going during the whole of the boot process. It's a debug feature like DEBUG_LL, it does not cooperate with

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

On 8 August 2013 11:23, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote Can't you put the relevant information into the device tree so that it works on multiplatform kernels? That's the way the kernel's chosen to store its

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

On 8 August 2013 12:05, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: I can see how to get it from the flat device tree by adding properties to chosen { } and riding on early_init_dt_scan_chosen() easily enough. From the results I have already I know on this platform that's ~500us after where we

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 2 August 2013 01:14, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 2 August 2013 07:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: x86 manages to do much better here because the everything looks like a PC effect means it's much easier for the kernel to produce output to serial or video very

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote: The vexpress defconfig has always been broken. ...maybe we could fix it? -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 2 August 2013 00:26, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 2 August 2013 01:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: with vexpress we have the added complication thrown into the mix that people use it a lot with QEMU ;-) ...if there's something special needed for QEMU, maybe the

Re: ARM client program boot architecture

On 23 July 2013 12:33, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: Historically each ARM SoC did its own thing for secondary CPU startup. New platforms are expected to use the PSCI spec (which unfortunately isn't an open document, but ARM partners can get access).

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

On 20 June 2013 22:56, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote: On 19 June 2013 20:32, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote: Please use linaro-kernel list for sending patches. I think linaro-kernel should be part of the cc, but I don't think that there is any policy in regards to not

Re: problem using QEMU

On 4 June 2013 09:10, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 00:07 -0400, David Long wrote: I'm trying to build for versatile express to run under QEMU. When I boot under QEMU I get errors regarding the SD voltage, and it fails. I've never really tried using QEMU so

Re: problem using QEMU

On 4 June 2013 16:54, David Long dave.l...@linaro.org wrote: $ qemu-system-arm -version QEMU emulator version 1.4.0 (Debian 1.4.0+dfsg-1expubuntu4), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard So my QEMU may be stale, and that may explain why now I get: clcd-pl11x: probe of 1002.clcd

Re: Cross-Compiling Qemu for Aarch64?

On 17 May 2013 11:11, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: +++ Mian M. Hamayun [2013-05-16 14:25 +0200]: I am reposting the following message to linaro-dev as I am using the following linaro toolchain for ARM64 cross-compilation: https://wiki.linaro.org/HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel In fact, I am

suggestion: move kernel patches off linaro-dev

Hi; does anybody else think it would be a good idea to move all the kernel patch email traffic off linaro-dev and onto a more kernel-specific mailing list (eg, linaro-kernel, maybe) ? A quick eyeball of a few pages of my gmail folder for linaro-dev shows that something like 75% of it is kernel

Re: [kvmarm] [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Virtio-desktop: Virtio-based virtual desktop

On 24 January 2013 14:38, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote: But check out the QEMU e500 machine. We have a fully device tree based machine type in the kernel. QEMU drives it by generating a device tree for devices it actually exposes on the fly. The ARM equivalent for that would be

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Support QEMU cross-compiling for ARM64 host

On 8 January 2013 15:57, Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net wrote: On 01/08/2013 04:08 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: The translator sources (as and when we implement a TCG QEMU target for this) should live under the existing target-arm. Of this I'm not certain, given that A64 is different enough

Re: [kvmarm] [PATCH] bootwrapper: CPU hotplug aware boot protocol

On 7 January 2013 13:47, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:23:48PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Does anyone have any further outstanding concerns or comments about my proposed patch? Since this doesn't seem to be merged yet, I'll just comment that this

Re: [kvmarm] [RFC] bootwrapper: Add support for the TC1 and TC2 CoreTiles

On 18 December 2012 16:42, Alexander Spyridakis a.spyrida...@virtualopensystems.com wrote: On 18 December 2012 12:10, Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com wrote: If you have BootMonitor, it is already capable of booting the kernel. The major difference is that BootMonitor doesn't initialize Hyp

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Fix check for architected timer

On 30 November 2012 15:30, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: From: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com We need to set the flags when checking the feature register. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com --- I found this patch in another fork of the bootwrapper and it looks

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Fix check for architected timer

On 4 December 2012 16:01, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: Er, this patch doesn't apply at all to the kvm bootwrapper. Whoops, false alarm due to failure to drive git properly (was on an ancient branch). Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org -- PMM

Re: [PATCH v2] bootwrapper: Enable non-secure access to the CCI

Medhurst t...@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org I've applied this patch and the arch-timers fix to the linaro boot-wrapper git repo. -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] bootwrapper: Add support for big.LITTLE models

[PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Initialise CCI device if found in the All: Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org and tested that the KVM boot is still OK. Patch 2 made git complain about trailing whitespace in one place but I'll just zap that in passing when I apply these. Dave, unless

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] bootwrapper: Add support for big.LITTLE models

On 9 October 2012 14:06, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:31:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: Patch 2 made git complain about trailing whitespace in one place but I'll just zap that in passing when I apply these. Thanks Dave, unless you have any further

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

On 26 September 2012 18:08, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: The patch has added an 'enter_hyp' call into the chunk of code which is relocated to some random address, which means the code is now too long and we only relocate

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: Signed-off-by: Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org This patch causes the kernel to get stuck at Calibrating delay loop I'm not sure why this happens (investigating) but if I move the enter_hyp macro call back to where it

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

On 26 September 2012 14:37, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: Signed-off-by: Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org This patch causes the kernel to get stuck at Calibrating delay loop I'm not sure why

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

On 26 September 2012 15:12, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 26 September 2012 14:37, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 6 September 2012 18:12, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: Signed-off-by: Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org This patch causes

Re: fastmodel run over ubuntu 64bit machine

On 20 September 2012 10:33, Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com wrote: However, the A15x4_A7x4 model is running quit slow for launching the kernel, about 1minute to showing the kernel booting screen. Whereas A15x1 model is launching quite fast, just in several seconds. This is in general not very

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Use local definition of string.h

On 4 September 2012 15:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: The semihosting and FDT code makes use of libc style string functions implemented in our string.c, however it relies of the system providing the string.h header file. This causes problems on toolchains that don't provide

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Use local definition of string.h

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Use local definition of string.h

On 4 September 2012 16:10, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: I guess to be fully consistent we should provide our own stddef.h and stdint.h, but if it's not causing problems it's not worth the effort. Actually, I'm wrong there. We're using gcc's -ffreestanding so it's being

Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle device tree memory regions larger than 4GB

On 6 July 2012 20:26, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: I would just change arm_add_memory to use phys_addr_t for the size param. This ultimately calls

Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle device tree memory regions larger than 4GB

On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/05/2012 11:48 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size) { + while (size 0x8000) { + arm_add_memory(base, 0x8000); + base += 0x8000

Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle device tree memory regions larger than 4GB

On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote: I would just change arm_add_memory to use phys_addr_t for the size param. This ultimately calls memblock functions which use phys_addr_t for sizes. So I have a patch that does this which basically works. However there is a bit I'm

Re: [Powertop] [PATCH] conditionally disable pci support on ARM platforms

On 24 June 2012 20:28, Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote: W dniu 22.06.2012 22:01, Arjan van de Ven pisze: being arm or not is completely irrelevant in this regard. (and there will undoubtedly ARM systems at some point that will have PCI in them) Already there are ARM

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

On 10 May 2012 23:34, Ricardo Salveti ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote: Linaro-dev is used for development related discussion, and it's the first most folks first subscribe to. I don't have the current number of folks

Re: error occurring in qemu-linaro revisions pulled since March 30th

On 12 April 2012 16:22, Russell Keith Davis russ...@russelldavis.org wrote: The only thing that changed in my setup, Virtualbox, scratchbox2, arm debian rootfs qemu-linaro is that i pulled a newer version than march 30th and i went from some expected errors http://pastebin.com/QTt8S9kT to

Re: error occurring in qemu-linaro revisions pulled since March 30th

On 12 April 2012 17:08, Russell Keith Davis russ...@russelldavis.org wrote: On 4/12/2012 11:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: If you can provide me with an easy way to reproduce this on my machine I can have a look at it. I don't actually use qemu on real hardware so not 100% sure it is a qemu

Re: qemu hardware gfx acceleration

On 9 April 2012 20:13, John Stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote: So the Google Android team just posted this: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/hsDu/~3/OCt1AQzfyWI/faster-emulator-with-better-hardware.html Which shows their device emulator running w/ hardware acceleration.  Since I know

Re: Gmail corrupting spaces in plain-text mail?

On 22 March 2012 19:31, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: Now I've had a chance to look into this, it seems that the plague of question marks actually seems to arise out of an interaction between Mutt and my unusual locale settings.  Basically if your locale settings don't support the

Re: [Question] How To Log QEMU Memory Access

2012/3/15 周春华 uuli...@gmail.com: Do you means that the QEMU TLB maps the guest virtual address to host virtual address, Yes. and the begging and end virtual addresses of the memory allocated for RAM device emulating are the RAM physical begging and end address from guest view? I don't know

Re: [Question] How To Log QEMU Memory Access

2012/3/15 周春华 uuli...@gmail.com: Peter Maydell wrote: Note that there are other slow paths for memory access which don't use the TLB and instead do go via physical addresses at the time they need to do the load/store. I want to know how to use these slow paths. Will they will guest virtual

Re: [Question] How To Log QEMU Memory Access

On 14 March 2012 14:01, 周春华 uuli...@gmail.com wrote: I got a job that should log the RAM memory access in the QEMU. First, I should find out the code line in QEMU to trap all RAM memory access. After some efforts, I have some conclusions: 1. I have found the function dealing with the

Re: 3, 2, 1....BLASTOFF

On 29 February 2012 13:25, Vishal Bhoj vishal.b...@linaro.org wrote: On 29 February 2012 12:33, Guruswamy, Senthilvadivu svad...@ti.com wrote: Which RTSM_EB are you using for this bring up? FastModel comes with only RTSM_VE of A15,A7 pack which has only cores simulated, not even uart in it.

anybody willing to boot a test kernel on an omap34xx/omap2 board for me?

Hi; I'm hoping somebody will be willing to run a test kernel for me on some omap boards and send me the dmesg output. (I'm trying to sort out QEMU's modelling of the OMAP ID registers and the TRMs are rather unhelpful; in particular the OMAP35x TRM claims that there are two overlapping registers

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On 27 February 2012 16:27, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote: R12 is not accessible from the 16 bit T1 Thumb encoding of mov immediate (which can only target r0..r7). Since we support only ARMv7+ there are T2 and T3 encodings available which do allow direct mov of an immediate into

Re: looking for sources for beagle u-boot/u-boot SPL for 1201 images

On 21 February 2012 20:55, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter: That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want. Your email reminds me we need to

Re: Linaro embedded Linux distro?

On 20 February 2012 16:42, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: During ELC a few people asked me if Linaro had something bigger than nano and smaller than Ubuntu that they could use to build stuff. Nano and then install the packages you actually need on top of that? -- PMM

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 9 February 2012 00:50, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote: Same result. Debug info from gdb: qemu: Unsupported syscall: 26 ptrace: Function not implemented. No threads. This bit of the log is uninteresting, because it is mono attempting to automatically capture a backtrace. As

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was the post install scripts involving a number of different mono packages. It's really easy

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 21 January 2012 12:04, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: $0 here is the process name, and Perl is trying to set it using prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...). [Google says it's done that only since Perl 5.14.] I think you're running under QEMU at this point, and QEMU doesn't support

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 3 February 2012 15:43, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: Thanks much for getting this fixed Peter. Perhaps at LC you might like to see another qemu issue that keeps us from being able to cross build the Linaro Ubuntu LEB. Sure; or you can always reach me via the bug tracking system :-)

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was the post install scripts involving a number of different mono packages. It's really easy to replicate. As Peter kindly suggested, time to revisit with the new

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

On 2 February 2012 08:28, Mattias Backman mattias.back...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote: 4 - Do you know if a similar page, but for a team, will also be available? There will be. Guilherme has circulated a mockup for that

Re: [Linaro-validation] Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On 27 January 2012 10:30, Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com wrote: I'm planning to modify the boot.S to be able to create an AXF file from separate kernel and DTB (will happen next week, if anyone wants to try it let me know and I'll notify you when it's ready) I would suggest you start out with

Re: Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On 26 January 2012 16:26, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: Looks like getting a big cloud instance running may help. Is the simulator I/O or compute bound? It is typically compute bound (unless you're short on RAM: 6GB the figure I've been bandying around as a plausible minimum).

Re: [Linaro-validation] Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On 26 January 2012 20:19, Zygmunt Krynicki zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org wrote: About device trees, does the simulator need an explicitly provided device tree (in a way we currently provide the kernel image and ramdisk) or is the dt table built into the image? The simulator doesn't care whether

Re: LiveBuild failure creating nano image

On 21 January 2012 10:08, Zygmunt Krynicki zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Matt Waddel matt.wad...@linaro.org wrote: I: create linaro user Can't set $0 with prctl(): Bad address at /usr/sbin/adduser line 86. Here is the perl code around line 86 in adduser:

Re: Cortex a15 in linaro?

On 16 January 2012 18:43, Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro wrote: Is there any cortex a15 board emulated in linaro? You don't say specifically but I'm going to assume you mean in qemu-linaro. I'm working on a patchset for the Versatile Express A15 board. This is currently in the upstream review

Re: ANN: git.linaro.org going down for up to 1h

On 14 December 2011 14:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 15:38 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote: We should be back up, with everything ready to go.  Do note that the ssh key has changed, so you will be prompted with warning notices about that. So all peoples

Re: lava-deployment-tool is now (also) on github

On 8 December 2011 01:22, Ricardo Salveti ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote: What I just didn't understand much is the relation with git.linaro.org, as now it sees we have 2 official git hosting places for projects. I know that technically using github is a lot easier, as setting up a git

Re: Register Now For Linaro Connect Q1.12

On 6 December 2011 10:34, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:47 +, Stephen Doel wrote: ** Following feedback at previous Linaro Connect events, the registration process now includes a) registration on Launchpad so you only have to go through the

Re: [EOL] Request for End Of Life - Beagleboard and Beagleboard-xM

.) -- Peter Maydell ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: QEMU status

On 23 November 2011 00:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote: I've been working on testing images under QEMU with the lava-dispatcher (mostly this is preparation for testing A15 using a fast model, but it's interesting in its own right too). Ah, this is cool, more automated

Re: QEMU status

On 23 November 2011 09:05, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 23 November 2011 00:48, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote: I've been working on testing images under QEMU with the lava-dispatcher (mostly this is preparation for testing A15 using a fast model

Re: December release schedule

On 22 November 2011 16:58, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote: Since most people will be on holidays, we have a modified schedule for December Christmas release. The current plan is to release one week earlier: * 2011-12-08 Toolchain WG 2011.12 release * 2011-12-15 Components

Re: Oneiric image directory on snapshots.linaro.org

On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote: Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it ubuntu-build would be rather

Re: Oneiric image directory on snapshots.linaro.org

On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote: On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote: Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu Eh? snapshots has

Re: auxv + neon

On 6 September 2011 16:09, Andy Doan andy.d...@linaro.org wrote: On 09/05/2011 11:35 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:10:58PM +0800, Jim Huang wrote: 2011/9/3 Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org: Is a method via the aux vectors to know at runtime if neon is or is not

Re: ARM CPU part numbers

On 5 September 2011 10:52, Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote: W dniu 05.09.2011 11:28, Andrew Stubbs pisze: Next question ... is /proc/cpuinfo really the best way to detect this? I mean, is auxv a better approach? Or something else? What's the most efficient, and most

Re: Usefulness of GCC's 64bit __sync_* ops on ARM

On 11 July 2011 09:42, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote: On 11 July 2011 09:36, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:29:01AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: QEMU supports calls into the fixed vector page (it just special cases attempts to execute

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

On 15 June 2011 00:47, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Mounir Bsaibes wrote: Does the kernel have to boot under the latest QEMU release? For device tree support I would think so.  An older Linaro release for U-Boot should be fine too.  Maybe John Crigby

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

On 15 June 2011 11:14, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote: Anyway, I really hope this is unlikely to happen for now [I should start this email with a disclaimer: this isn't intended to be finger pointing, just an explanation of why we should expect and plan for QEMU breakage rather than hoping

Re: The Linaro monthly release cycle

On 15 June 2011 15:40, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote: if we want to guarantee that QEMU and the kernel work together I think we really need to pretty much freeze the kernel two weeks before QEMU's release date, in order to have

Re: CFP: Building a Linaro LEB Manual

On 11 June 2011 21:19, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: One of the blueprints we have for this cycle is to improve the manual that accompanies the release. This work is covered by : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-ubuntu-leb-documentation I've created a

does anybody have the kernel ddeb for the 1105 omap release hwpack?

I'm looking for a copy of the ddeb (ie the debug info) for the omap kernel in the 1105 release. That used to be here: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/universe/l/linux-linaro-omap/linux-image-2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap-dbgsym_2.6.38-1003.4~ppa5_armel.ddeb but unfortunately the archive expired it last

Re: The need for more verbose work item updates

On 24 May 2011 15:21, Alexandros Frantzis alexandros.frant...@linaro.org wrote: in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by any additional information.  Of course, not all work items need more

Re: The need for more verbose work item updates

On 24 May 2011 20:31, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: My solution to this is to file a bug and link it to the BP if it needs more than one line of info. This seems to work because anything that needs more than one line is probably not 2 days of work - which is what should go in the

Re: Do we need prebuilt images of all types?

On 20 May 2011 15:38, Guilherme Salgado guilherme.salg...@linaro.org wrote: During LDS we agreed to provide prebuilt Linaro images at our milestones[1], for users who can't/won't run linaro-media-create. One thing we forgot to discuss, though, is if it's worth doing so for all image types or

Re: Do we need prebuilt images of all types?

On 20 May 2011 18:10, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote: On 20 May 2011 17:50, Paul Larson paul.lar...@linaro.org wrote: The Ubuntu Images have an extra bit that happens on first boot where it expands itself to consume your entire SD card. Sounds a good trick; can't we just use

Re: Gerrit userstory for multi-branch development

On 19 May 2011 23:01, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Well, so bottom line of this, as far as I see it, is: Gerrit is de facto tool for Android, and for Linaro Android we'd like to be sure that it supports more

Re: Linaro development cycle thoughts

On 17 May 2011 09:54, Alexandros Frantzis alexandros.frant...@linaro.org wrote: So my questions/suggestions are: 1. Do other engineers feel this way? From a working group perspective, the Ubuntu cycle isn't very significant -- everything we do is on one month cycles except for the

  1   2   >