Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Adding support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board
Makefile
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
---
Makefile| 11 ++-
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 104 +++
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org
---
board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile| 46 +++
board/samsung/smdkv310/config.mk
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:49PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch turns the sdhci-of-core common stuff into helper functions
added into sdhci-pltfm.c, and makes sdhci-of device drviers self
registered using the same pair of .probe and .remove used by
sdhci-pltfm device drivers.
As a
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It turns
sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc-imx.c into one sdhci-esdhc.c,
which gets the same pair of .probe and .remove
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
The structure sdhci_pltfm_data is not necessarily to be in a public
header like include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h, so the patch moves it
into drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h and eliminates the former one.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:13:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
After fec dt support is added, the following compile error will be
seen when building a pure non-dt kernel.
drivers/net/fec.c: In function ‘fec_probe’:
drivers/net/fec.c:1383: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
Hi, Grant,
The two patches for mx51/mx53 DT support have the same issue, which
is the S-O-B will be missed when you git am. Let me know if you want me
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:36:16AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
Hi, Grant,
The two patches for mx51/mx53 DT support have the same issue, which
is the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:36:16AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:34:12AM +, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
Hi, Grant,
Hi All,
The minutes of the power management weekly call can be found at :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-03-31
Highlights: 11.11 planning: results of discussions with TSC
Regards,
Amit
___
linaro-dev mailing list
I have an Overo Tide that is capable of running at 720Mhz. It defaults
to 600Mhz, but the mpurate kernel command line argument allows it to
overridden.
The problem is that Linaro kernels (with the Linaro .config) always show
499.92 BogoMIPS in /proc/cpuinfo regardless of what I pass as the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
As the .dtb files will be naturally generated in the same kernel
folder as kernel image sits, why do not we ship .dtb in the same
folder as kernel image /boot?
Version numbers. If two kernel packages are installed, that means two
sets of .dtb
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:30AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
This patch is to change the static clock creating and registering to
the dynamic way, which scans dt clock nodes, associate clk with
device_node, and then add them to clkdev accordingly.
It's a pretty straight translation from non-dt
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:32AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been
associated with device_node-data. So the use of function
__of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Not really true
Greetings,
We are pleased to announce that we now have a new blog engine
(WordPress, so much better than the previous one), and also a Planet
Linaro RSS aggregator.
See
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/03/31/wordpress-planet-linaro/
for details.
Many thanks to Ian Davenport for the blog
Hey Nico,
So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
the hubs, but no devices.
Andy reported seeing similar on his overo board, so I bisected the issue
down to:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
Hey Nico,
So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
the hubs, but no devices.
Andy reported seeing similar on his overo board, so I bisected the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
Hey Nico,
So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
the hubs, but no
On 03/31/2011 03:39 PM, john stultz wrote:
9e64bb1e9f0613093b3e34ac5402fcfef0dcc35a is the first bad commit
commit 9e64bb1e9f0613093b3e34ac5402fcfef0dcc35a
Author: Keshava Munegowda keshava_mgo...@ti.com
Date: Tue Mar 1 20:08:19 2011 +0530
arm: omap: usb: Invoke usbhs core device
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:52 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, john stultz wrote:
So I've been seeing USB issues on my beagle xm board with the latest
linaro-2.6.38 tree, where when the system boots, lsusb will only show
the hubs, but no devices.
Andy reported seeing
21 matches
Mail list logo
