On 06/14/2011 04:26 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/09/2011 10:01 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
... and with omap4_defconfig anyway cpufreq seems at least to start up
on both CPUs on Panda now, cool.
Going to have a
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/09/2011 10:01 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
... and with omap4_defconfig anyway cpufreq seems at least to start up
on both CPUs on Panda now, cool.
Going to have a go at omap2plus_defconfig.
omap2plus_defconfig is still
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but it's
On 06/09/2011 05:38 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/119896
I'm not entirely satisfied with the W() usage in there though, even less
so by the THUMB(nop) that are inserted here and there to provide proper
padding. As the
On 06/09/2011 09:22 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
All those fixes plus a bunch of other fixes from mainline are now merged
in linaro-2.6.39.
I wasn't seeing it die early but that also looks like a good find.
Just a FYI a bogus line in core cpufreq driver has crept into
On 06/09/2011 10:26 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
[ 2.262329] Freeing init memory: 292K
init: hwclock main process (519) killed by ILL signal
SIGILL issue requires CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 enabled to see it. Disabling
CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 (and fixing stuff like EXT4 and DEVTMPFS
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
No, were using two different methods to produce configs. The one I use
produces a Thumb2 kernel, the one you use
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but it's obviously
totally irrelevant and causes no code changes at all (which
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but it's obviously
totally irrelevant and causes no code changes at all (which
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 09:22 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:09 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
after Starting kernel I haven't investigated any further.
Try disabling
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:01 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:35 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Disabling Thumb2 fixes the problem.
What did you actually disable? Presumably not CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL so
On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
This config has CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y and doesn't have an entry for
CONFIG_CPU_V6
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
I intend to make this better this cycle. The various flavours will be more
consistent with one another and the configs will be much leaner. Also I have
found that one can successfully boot test a kernel with only make uImage
so you don't have to take
Can you enter a bug for this so I don't forget to make these =y if
that is all it takes to fix this.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Andy Doan andy.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
I intend to make this better this cycle. The various flavours will be more
On 06/07/2011 11:04 AM, John Rigby wrote:
Can you enter a bug for this so I don't forget to make these =y if
that is all it takes to fix this.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/794134
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
No, were using two different methods to produce configs. The one I use
produces a Thumb2 kernel, the one you use doesn't.
Well, it seems we have a few different problems here:
Certainly, it
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tixy t...@yxit.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
On 06/06/2011 05:44 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The .config I'm using is that described on the wiki at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
Try disabling CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL and rebuilding.
If this does fix the problem, this suggests
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:12:29AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
or cloned from either of those:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
vexpress
linux-linaro-2.6.39/master doesn't seem to work on vexpress using the
linux-linaro-natty configuration (I get starting the kernel, then
nothing).
Upstream v2.6.39 does appear to work fully on vexpress in both ARM and
Thumb-2.
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed
upstream:). If not they they
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
presume if those patches were headed upstream they would
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
or cloned from either of those:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full
On 2 June 2011 19:01, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or
On 2 June 2011 22:12, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful
Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
or cloned from either of those:
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git
31 matches
Mail list logo
