+++ Ganesan, Aravind [2015-05-13 20:58 -0600]:
On 5/13/2015 7:12 PM, Wookey wrote:
+++ Ganesan, Aravind [2015-05-13 18:35 -0600]:
Hi Guys,
I have two questions:
(1) I have download gcc-4.9 tool chain from
http://releases.linaro.org/14.08/components/toolchain/binaries.
The kernel
+++ Ramana Radhakrishnan [2014-02-24 09:08 +]:
From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-
toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Wookey
Sent: 23 February 2014 20:43
To: Rob Savoye
Cc: Linaro ToolChain
Subject: Re: [Weekly] 17-21 FEB 2013
+++ Rob
+++ Rob Savoye [2014-02-24 07:54 -0700]:
On 02/24/2014 07:15 AM, Wookey wrote:
Where does a 'boards' file go/come from?
It's a DejaGnu config file, used for remote testing.
Yes, or setting QEMU_UNAME on the command line, but I don't see how
those work well with the binfmt settings
+++ Rob Savoye [2014-02-23 08:05 -0700]:
On 02/23/2014 03:09 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Is this a problem with the emulated shared libraries not loading (qemu
itself should be static)? Wookey did find a problem when built on older
distros as the kernel version (CONFIG_UNAME) passed
because something
else came up). If anyone else if poking and wants to compare notes that
would be good.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain
have most un-upstreamed linaro optimisations, but is handy to install.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/binutils-arm-none-eabi_3.html
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gcc-arm-none-eabi_3.html
I expect they'll be available in unstable/sid soon.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware
://ports.ubuntu.com/dists/saucy/main/binary-arm64/
So you should be able to debootstrap an arm64 image and add armhf binaries to
it, or vice versa.
I've not actually tried that so I don't know how well it works. There may still
be important bits missing.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware
toolchain
people?
What is your use-case? Knowing that will help us advice on best course
of current action and inform us on how we might need to change what's
on offer.
And finally, yes, I don't believe crosstool-ng supports multiarch
paths much/at all yet. Fixing this would probably be useful.
Wookey
but tricky. Things like
qemu effectively do this (no qemu support for 64-bit arm available
yet), but probably not in a way useful to you.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
___
linaro-toolchain
already had the GNU triplet-name argument for this ABI. I don't
think having it again in order to use something slightly different for
the linker name is very helpful.
Unless of course we find that was another chimera and in fact that's
not really agreed either...
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro
binary on an
ARMv5 (virtual) board. (It wasn't easy to spot that the problem came
from libgcc.)
Steve Magoun said at UDS that they (canonical OEM team I think?) had a
tool to spot binaries built for the wrong ARMvX flavour. That might be
useful in this case?
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro
instead of the cross-build environment.
That is correct for libraries, and probably headers for the time being,
but as soon as we start installing to multiarch paths it will become
incorrect for headers and would at least need adjusting for
libraries.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian
' link).
This issue is a useful subject for UDS discussion, I believe.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
