https://mdsafetech.org/problems/5g/
I don't know whether the above is a reliable source or not, but it seems
to be discussing this topic.
Essentially they are saying there are no long term studies on the
effects of electromagnetic radiation, and it's considered safe if it
does not burn the
On Friday, 3 May 2019 13:14:01 AEST Marghanita da Cruz wrote:
> Allowable EME levels are set well below levels at which harm to people may
> occur.
based exclusively on an assessment of heating effects.
And I think it would be ingenuous to think communications companies and other
vested
www.jrseco.com does not say there is a problem with 5G itself but the
cumulative effect: "5G will substantially increase exposure to
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G,
WiFi etc. for telecommunications already in place."
On Friday, 3 May 2019 11:20:27 AEST Marghanita da Cruz wrote:
> Of course not finding evidence is not proof [...]
Philosophically yes, but it's not true there is no evidence. Biological
effects of EM radiation can be demonstrated on-demand in the lab and there are
numerous epidemiological
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 10:44:45 AEST Kim Holburn wrote:
> https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-communications/the-terrifying-potential-of-the-5g-network
>
>> The Terrifying Potential of the 5G Network
>> [...]
Not the least interesting part of this report is the article on the
