Re: [OCLUG-Tech] late delivery of oclug mail

2012-09-08 Thread Dave O'Neill
Nope... not ARM development as the spammy trigger. Here's the keywords that pushed it over the edge: Word: 120+MB (0.990)Word: benchmarked (0.990)Word: multiple+target (0.990)Word: thread+much (0.990)Word: Cortex+A9 (0.898)Word: Cortex (0.858)Word: single+multiple (0.820)Word: needed+push (0.820)

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] slow?

2011-10-18 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:01:44AM -0700, Rob Echlin wrote: Anyone know if there is some way we could check if it was caught by the spam filter? Nothing appears to have been blocked. I see the message OT: NTSC tuner card from bjloc...@lockie.ca, but it went through (and so did many of the

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Ticket System

2011-04-15 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:48:52PM -0400, Raj wrote: I've seen RT (http://bestpractical.com/rt/) used in a lot of places - and for the non-tech user, it has a pretty simple interface - just email and it will create a new ticket for you (or update an existing one) I've used RT before, and it

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Tux 2010 questions

2010-12-12 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:58:27 -0500 Lisa L exexp...@gmail.com wrote: It has been suggested that since we'll be moving to the new server, this is a good opportunity to reflect on our spam filtering methods. Brett Delmage recently encountered an issue where accidentally breaking the

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] safe viewing of encrypted file

2010-11-11 Thread Dave O'Neill
John C Nash wrote: Some of you may remember my OCLUG talk on tools for carrying encrypted files on USB. Still on this topic, I'm wondering the best way (for the moment just in Linux) to simply view the contents of an encrypted plain text file (my password list!) in a way that doesn't leave

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Linux Digest, Vol 69, Issue 21

2010-09-30 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:33:41PM -0400, Peter Meyer wrote: I might be misunderstanding what you are looking for. Would you not be able to take two Bell DSL line and from a Linux host use bonding to drive the two Ethernet (ppp) interfaces? No... with ADSL, he's still constrained by the

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Fwd: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-08-04 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:34:13AM -0400, Dave O'Neill wrote: I've got the go-ahead to get OCLUG set up on Hosted CanIt. Someone in charge needs to fill out http://www.roaringpenguin.com/node/hostedform to get things rolling. Seeing that nobody's filled out the form, I've gone ahead

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Fwd: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-08-02 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 05:07:11PM +, Lisa wrote: Thank you Dave, for your help with this. There's been some discussion by the Board, actually, that both hardware and much of the software on Tux need upgrading. I've got the go-ahead to get OCLUG set up on Hosted CanIt. Someone in

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Fwd: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-07-31 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:54:34PM -0400, Lisa L wrote: I'll paste below the contents of the files John sent. To me, it appears to be a Viagra ad coming from a host in Spain, with a link to a website in Russia. What we're trying to determine is whether (1) Tux has been compromised by

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] How to find extended system information?

2009-04-10 Thread Dave O'Neill
John C Nash wrote: For some benchmarking tests I want to do, I'd like to be able to use command line tools to get the following information (not only for Linux -- my tests will be on Mac and PC too, but that will come later): - OS version, by which I mean not just the uname -a stuff, but

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Fw: bank of montreal fees

2009-01-21 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:25:28PM -0800, R RENAUD wrote: Another good reason not to send sensitive information via email. I think you mean Another reason to encrypt your sensitive mail. If you and your daughter had been using GPG, the message would have been encrypted with her key, and the

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Rogers and Sendmail

2009-01-13 Thread Dave O'Neill
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:52:10PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: I would suggest, unfortunately, that the OP move away from Sendmail. Though I haven't seen any significant security vulnerabilities from it lately, its configuration file is archaic and difficult to understand. There are many other