Re: 32 bit binaries loadable in zSeries GA's from Red Hat/SuSE?

2002-03-22 Thread Jae-hwa Park
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:46:13PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote: Older Red Hat Linux beta versions contained glibc-emu31* rpms providing this support, newer versions now have compat-* rpms which provide this. At the moment we only support glibc/libstdc++ and e.g. no ncurses libs or further

Ancient penguins yield evolution clue - a bit OT

2002-03-22 Thread Robert Matthews
I couldn't resist passing along this link from the BBC News web site: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1885000/1885384.stm Valuable clues to the pace of evolution have been found in the bones of long-dead penguins . . . . . . a way of dating species and how long ago they

Re: 32 bit binaries loadable in zSeries GA's from Red Hat/SuSE?

2002-03-22 Thread Loren Charnley, Jr.
Ken, Finally, someone that subscribes to my theory KISS.!! Loren Charnley, Jr. Tech Support Administrator Family Dollar Stores, Inc. Phone: (704) 847-6961 Ext. 2000 -Original Message- From: Ken Dreger: Dr. D [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:00 PM To:

Re: Tomcat

2002-03-22 Thread Steve Guthrie
I have both Tomcat 4.01 and Apache 1.3.19-66 running on Linux for S390. I have complied the APJ connector and I am using it in a load-balanced environment successfully. Don't use mod-webapps. Happy to help any and all. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Tomcat

2002-03-22 Thread Rengasamy, Samy
What kind of troubles did you have with mod-webapp? -Original Message- From: Steve Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat I have both Tomcat 4.01 and Apache 1.3.19-66 running on Linux for S390. I have complied

Zope on Linux/390

2002-03-22 Thread Rengasamy, Samy
Has anybody build Zope for Linux/390? Is there a place to get the binary from? Samy Rengasamy.

Re: mistake in movefs-howto

2002-03-22 Thread Patterson, Ross
Carsten Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rm: cannot remove `.' or `..' thanks for the answer.. I should have tested it before posting, That would have been a *really* gutsy move - if you believe rm -f * .* deletes . and .., then rm -rf * .* should recursively run up the filesystem

Re: Listserv problems

2002-03-22 Thread Alan Cox
Yours was the only real reply I have gotten. Is there a way to get Marist to send the mail using a lower case domain name? Domain names are case independant

Re: redhat linux bootstrap volume

2002-03-22 Thread Gelbard, Sandy
Thanks Rob. I'll it from my suse system. -Original Message- From: Rob van der Heij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: redhat linux bootstrap volume Also, I already have suse running in an lpar, is there any way that I

Oracle 9.0 and PHP

2002-03-22 Thread Eddie Chen
Have anyone rebuild PHP with ORACLE 9.0

Re: mistake in movefs-howto

2002-03-22 Thread Post, Mark K
Well, then I guess I'm a gutsy guy, because I tested that command _before_ I wrote the HOWTO. That's how I knew it would work. (I try not to depend on theory when documenting stuff.) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Patterson, Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22,

Re: insmod: dasd: no module by that name found

2002-03-22 Thread Post, Mark K
Sandy, 'cause you're a dolt _is_ a valid answer, it's just not a very polite or informative one! :) You can't do an insmod on a system that is running off real DASD because the DASD driver has to be compiled into the kernel, not as a module. (It's kind of hard to load the DASD driver so that

Another Archive of the Linux-390 Mailing List

2002-03-22 Thread Post, Mark K
While I was tracking down broken links on the linuxvm.org web site today, I came across http://www.mail-archive.com/linux390%40news.dtag.de/ which has at least the last couple of months of this mailing list archived. The search function is quite fast, too, which is why I mention it in the first

Re: mistake in movefs-howto

2002-03-22 Thread Carsten Sommer
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Patterson, Ross wrote: Hi Ross, rm: cannot remove `.' or `..' thanks for the answer.. I should have tested it before posting, That would have been a *really* gutsy move - if you believe rm -f * .* deletes . and .., then rm -rf * .* should recursively run up