Re: /proc/dasd/devices

2002-10-09 Thread Rob van der Heij
At 17:08 08-10-02, Rick Troth wrote: And while we're at it, it would be helpful to have a userspace program to do it and return a completion code (and maybe even do the CP LINK as well). I would disagree about the CP LINK part. More significantly, this may be an ioctl() type of call.

Re: Dasd partition disappeared

2002-10-09 Thread Volker Sameske
Michael, could you please send me the following information offline? I would like to have a look into the problem. dasdview -b 0 -s 3b -2 -f /dev/dasde (first 3 blocks of track 0) dasdview -b 1t -s 6b -2 -f /dev/dasde (first 6 blocks of track 1) dasdview -b 2t -s 1b -2 -f /dev/dasde (first

Re: ReBuild Kernel 2.4.7 with gcc-3.2

2002-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 00:33, Ulrich Weigand wrote: I would not recommend building kernel 2.4.7 with gcc 3.2, because the kernel is rather sensitive w.r.t. compiler version, and there are several cases where old kernels contain constructs that old compilers accepted, but cause either

Re: Proc File system on v-disk

2002-10-09 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:45:02AM -0400, Davis, Lawrence wrote: Is the Proc FS hit a lot during normal Linux operations it would seem to be a good candidate for V-disk. The /proc filesystem is a virtual file systems, only really existant in core memory. There is no actual file storage on any

Re: ReBuild Kernel 2.4.7 with gcc-3.2

2002-10-09 Thread Eddie Chen
How about GCC-3.0.5 level???

qeth problems

2002-10-09 Thread Michael K Lambert
Hello again, I've been trying to give a linux image access to an OSA via the qeth module with no luck. I have been following the instructions in the Large Scale Linux Deployment Redpiece because it deals with Red Hat 7.2 systems, which is what we run here. While searching through previous posts

Re: /proc/dasd/devices

2002-10-09 Thread Rick Troth
And while we're at it, it would be helpful to have a userspace program to do it and return a completion code (and maybe even do the CP LINK as well). I would disagree about the CP LINK part. More significantly, this may be an ioctl() type of call. Punching strings to /proc pseudo

Re: qeth problems

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Perry
addparms should be add_parms You should also be able to configure it with ifconfig eth0 up ipaddress netmask netmask. Ciao Mark -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael K Lambert Sent: 09 October 2002 17:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: qeth problems

2002-10-09 Thread Carlos Ordonez
I think your problems is that the addparms is add_parms. Carlos :-) Saying goes: Great minds think alike - I say: Great minds think for themselves! Carlos A. Ordonez IBM Corporation Server Consolidation |-+--- | | Michael K | |

postgres

2002-10-09 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, we are working on a goverment developement, to migrate an Multiprise 2003 with OS/390 2.6 (and DB2) to a z800 with z/vm and linux, actually we dont know what DB we will use, we have two options: DB2 and postgres, obviously we want to use postgres, but we need some help to make the

Re: Linux Analyst Day

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Perry
Hi Phil, can you find out why IBM's middleware products for zLinux are mostly 31bit and not yet 64bit? Is this related to demand, number of current/predicted 31/64bit customers - basically dig a little ;-) Anyone else wondering the same - or am I in isolation on this? Ciao Mark -Original

Re: Proc File system on v-disk

2002-10-09 Thread Davis, Lawrence
Thanks, It makes since now. Larry -Original Message- From: Kris Van Hees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proc File system on v-disk On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:45:02AM -0400, Davis, Lawrence wrote: Is the Proc FS

Re: Linux Analyst Day

2002-10-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 22:48, Mark Perry wrote: Hi Phil, can you find out why IBM's middleware products for zLinux are mostly 31bit and not yet 64bit? Is this related to demand, number of current/predicted 31/64bit customers - basically dig a little ;-) I know I'd probably add How come

Re: Linux Analyst Day

2002-10-09 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Alan Cox wrote: Does IBM have any plans for an x86 JIT for S/390 so that x86 Linux apps can be run on the platform I don't think so. The performance probably wouldn't be great anyway. (It would certainly make an interesting project, though. I've been looking at valgrind recently ... ;-/)

Distributed Tape Subsystem announcement

2002-10-09 Thread Dennis Andrews
Attached is a copy of the announcement for our new Distributed Tape product. I though you all may be interested. Dennis. NEWS RELEASE UTS Global Announces Distributed Tape Subsystem for Mainframe Linux Systems Santa Clara, CA, October 8, 2002 UTS Global, LLC, the worldwide

Re: postgres

2002-10-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:51, you wrote: Hi, we are working on a goverment developement, to migrate an Multiprise 2003 with OS/390 2.6 (and DB2) to a z800 with z/vm and linux, actually we dont know what DB we will use, we have two options: DB2 and postgres, obviously we want to use postgres,

Amanda and UTS tape tools -- big thumbs up...

2002-10-09 Thread David Boyes
UTS Global Announces Distributed Tape Subsystem for Mainframe Linux Systems [ ... ] I'll also chime in and mention that I've just finished testing Amanda with the UTS tools. Amanda works *very* well with these tools, which gives us a very nice complete open-source backup solution for Windows,