Robert,
I tested Suse 7.2, Red Hat 7 and Debian 3.01 under VM/ESA 2.4.0 using G3
(MP2003),
G4 (9672RB5 and RY5) and G5(MP3000) without any problem. Suse seens to
be more
friendly, but if you know Linux, I recomend Debian. You have no company
asking $$$ to
you as maintenance fee.
Good luck
Robert
How do I setup db2's on linux..
do i setup 1 db2 per linux instance
or more than 1 db2 on a linux instance
police db2 on linux1
finance db2 on linux2
payroll db2 on linux3
or all the above on linux1??
Absolutely agreed.
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:14, Adam Thornton wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:10, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> > SLES8 should be able to run on any supported level of z/VM on any
> > supported G5 or higher machine.
>
> That said, you really want to be running z/VM 4.2+fixes or later,
>
Usermode linux is a relatively neat setup for the PC world but
its not afaik running on S/390 and makes some interesting
assumptions too.
Has anyone gotten SLES7 Yast Online Update to work ? Every server I try to
goto says: "File not found on server" Maybe I just need a new list of
mirrors. Any help is appreciated.
Josh Konkol, CNE MCSE
Technical Research Specialist
.~.GuideOne Insurance
/V\
/( )\
^^-^^
This
I believe I am correct in saying that any supported version of VM (ESA 2.4
or higher) and any zSeries processor will work just fine. A 9672 is not
zSeries, it's a S390 type. This is a 32bit only processor, of course. At
this point in time and going into the future, I would certainly recommend a
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:10, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> SLES8 should be able to run on any supported level of z/VM on any
> supported G5 or higher machine.
That said, you really want to be running z/VM 4.2+fixes or later,
because Guest LANs make your life so very, very, VERY much easier.
Adam
SLES8 should be able to run on any supported level of z/VM on any
supported G5 or higher machine.
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:49, Robert Luebkemann wrote:
> I have been given the job of putting Linux under z/VM for a proof of
> concept and maybe some internal migrations/conversions. I need to know if
We run SLES8 under z/VM 3.1 here on a z900 (2064) LPAR.
--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
"A bird in hand is safer than one overhead."
Robert Luebkemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [E
I have been given the job of putting Linux under z/VM for a proof of
concept and maybe some internal migrations/conversions. I need to know if I
order SuSe 8, which I believe is the most current, do I need z/VM 4.4? Can
I use 3.1, VM 2, etc? Also, what generation zSeries processor is required?
990,
linuxvm.org is the best general resource. Can you be more specific?
Jefferson Davis
Robert Luebkemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ungard.com> cc:
Sent by: Linux o
Hi,
I've looking around for a document that tells me release of a certain Linux
(SuSe, RedHat) runs under what level of z/VM and which hardware. Can
someone point me to a place?
Thanks!
Rob
I have not done an extensive comparison between using Linux on ZSeries and
using UML, but from the experiments I have done with e.g. AFS, one thing
stands out very clearly: Linux on zSeries (under VM) provides you with a whole
range of resource management tools that are not available under UML. In
Thanks,
I don't want to put UML on zSeries but I want to prove that z/VM is the
best choice ...
Again it's difficult for me to prove this because i don't master UML anyway
...
Regards,
Vallet Fabrice
PSA Peugeot Citroën
Direction des Systèmes d'Information
Service INSI/ETSO/MVS
Site de Poissy -
Dunno if UML has been "ported" to zSeries or not.
That would clinch it. Most of us feel the same as you do.
Personally, UML is a great project. But z/VM offers things that
are significant in the most positive ways, things that UML
just cannot do, even if it has been ported: hypersockets,
no
Hi list,
We have plan to implement Linux on zSeries ...
For me there is no doubt about the solution but some people who works on
Linux Intel platform want to use UML instead ...
I'm a mainframer and i don't now anything about UML ...
Do you know the Pros and Cons ...
Regards,
Vallet Fabrice
P
Thanks Jim!
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Neale,
Thanks - I let the ITSO know.
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:17:23PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 11:11, John Summerfield wrote:
> > > I'm not familiar with SuSE, but I woul;d guess that if binaries created
> > > on S7 run on S8 and RHL 7, then they
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2003 11:11, John Summerfield wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with SuSE, but I woul;d guess that if binaries created
> > on S7 run on S8 and RHL 7, then they should also run on RHL 8.
>
> Only if you avoid C++ or link statically agai
It may be a draft, but even so things like "Delete this note box when
done" are not the standard one expects from IBM. Perhaps Lotus should
give up Framemaker and use Epic?
Michael (ex Boeblingen documentation)
FN> Mike,
FN> You might want to rebuild the PDF. The bookmarks are badly constructed
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
22 matches
Mail list logo
