On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 00:26, Doug Clark wrote:
I am running SuSE Linux in an LPAR. And according to the SuSE documentation
installation using ssh (text mode) recommends 128+ MB of memory be
assigned to the LPAR. I have 128 MB of central memory assigned and another
128 MB of expanded memory
I have just bumped into something that may be of interest to the list.
Xen is a virtual machine monitor for x86 that supports execution of
multiple guest operating systems with unprecedented levels of
performance and resource isolation.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/index.html
Since upgrading to the latest security fix kernel from SuSE, /sbin/blogd
dies on boot. From the man pages it looks like it's a SuSE thing for
logging to the system console. But, I can still use VM as a console for
the guest.
Jan 14 02:04:30 linfs1 kernel: Loaded 10177 symbols from
I also see this when I do a traceroute command
traceroute 10.38.135.1
3 sendto: Permission denied
traceroute: wrote 10.38.135.1 40 chars, ret=-1
*sendto: Permission denied
traceroute: wrote 10.38.135.1 40 chars, ret=-1
*sendto: Permission denied
traceroute: wrote 10.38.135.1 40 chars, ret=-1
Their paper Xen and the Art of Virtualization specifically mentions VM/370
in page 12.
This sounds neat, especially with EMC buying VMware. Love to have a space
server to play with this.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
(b) Buyer shall not, and shall not have the authority to, amend, modify or
waive any right under or assign any SVRX License without the prior written
consent of Seller. In addition, at Seller's sole discretion and direction,
Buyer shall amend, supplement, modify or waive any rights under, or shall
That sounds like an iptables/ipchains firewall issue. Try
iptables -F
if that gets a command not found error, then
ipchains -F
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Davis, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, it is for SHARE in Long Beach.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Avoid the rush, volunteer early!
Is this for the coming Share conference in Long Beach. We have 3
See Neale's SCSI presentation on linuxvm.org. There's some performance data
in there.
Capsule summary: the SCSI stuff is very, very fast. If your hardware
supports it, it is a Good Thing, and more forward-looking.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
-Original Message-
From:
Mark you were right the first time and when I entered the command
route add -net default eth0
All started working correctly
I then got a session going and ran Yast to make sure all the files got
updated correctly. Then I cycled the ID and came up without any errors for
TCP/IP and/or
I have a user that wants to use mysql on one of my lpars.
I have an issue where root can issue the mysql command from shell and get
into the mysql command line interface. When a non-root user tries, I get
this:
/ mysql
ERROR 2002: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:25:27AM -0500, Froberg, David C wrote:
Their paper Xen and the Art of Virtualization specifically mentions VM/370
in page 12.
This sounds neat, especially with EMC buying VMware. Love to have a space
server to play with this.
I'm pretty sure Xen is mostly
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:37:06AM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
See Neale's SCSI presentation on linuxvm.org. There's some performance data
in there.
Capsule summary: the SCSI stuff is very, very fast. If your hardware
supports it, it is a Good Thing, and more forward-looking.
Neale sent it to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:37:06AM -0500, David Boyes wrote:
Capsule summary: the SCSI stuff is very, very fast. If your hardware
supports it, it is a Good Thing, and more forward-looking.
Aaargh. That last reply was supposed to just go to David. Apologies.
Adam
Privilege problems on /tmp/mysql.sock maybe?
Rod
I believe I see a bug, that was documented for this library in general, in
SLES8. I wonder if this bug has been addressed in current releases of pam
and if this fixes are available for SLES8? I know the bug was either not
introduced into Redhat 7.2 for Z or that it was fixed. I see it only on
Does not exist. First thing I checked. Not even when root is running the
command does that file exist.
|-+
| | Rod Furey|
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | n.nl|
| | Sent by:
Dans un message du 14 jan ` 10:40, James Melin icrivait :
Does not exist. First thing I checked. Not even when root is running
the command does that file exist.
Does root have a ~/.my.cnf file which specifies the name of the socket ?
If so, you should specify the socket name on the command
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:40:05AM -0500, Eric Sammons wrote:
When logging in via ssh I get connection closed. This is due to a missing
home directory or the inability to create one. I have the following entry
in /etc/pam.d/sshd, as I do in Redhat 7.2.
session required
Googling around gives various answers including but not limited to:
priv prob on the socket
priv prob on the config file
no passwd in the dB
no grant been issued on something in the dB
Take your pick...
Rod
I was disappointed, if I read correctly,
that Xen required changes to the guest operating system.
-- R;
Yes, you read right. All this came up back October, under the subject line
of XEN. Interesting, following the VMWARE thread.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Richard Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VM for
Hi,
Eric Sammons:
I believe I see a bug, that was documented for this library in general, in
SLES8. I wonder if this bug has been addressed in current releases of pam
and if this fixes are available for SLES8? I know the bug was either not
introduced into Redhat 7.2 for Z or that it was
I could not locate the 'sudoers' file. Any one has any idea?
In my slackware box it was under /etc/sudoers
You asked this same question on the 5th.
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.43256
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.43262
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had the same issue. We had re-IPLed the Linux LPAR and possibly it got
shutdown uncleanly.
mysqld did not work but safe_mysqld did.
I can connect as any user now.
My guess is that the mysqld daemon is not up. When it tries to come up it
checks its pid fild and sock file. If it is already there,
Thanks, I must have lost the response somehow.
I never had to install sudo. I will go looking for it. Google, here I
come!
Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/14/2004 09:48 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That typo is in my E-mail...
Thanks for catching that...
Eric Sammons
(804)697-3925
FRIT - Unix Systems
Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/14/2004 11:50 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
We are still working on our support contact so I am not sure I can get the
quick and dirty from SuSE yet, so I wonder does anyone in this group know
the availability status of 2.4.24 for SLES8? Also, anything to watch for
or perhaps a readme for fixes, enhancements etc. . .
Our security folks
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:16:34PM -0500, Eric Sammons wrote:
We are still working on our support contact so I am not sure I can get the
quick and dirty from SuSE yet, so I wonder does anyone in this group know
the availability status of 2.4.24 for SLES8? Also, anything to watch for
or
More than likely, SUSE will _not_ issue a 2.4.24 kernel. What usually
happens is that the fix for a particular problem is back-ported to the level
they're currently distributed. This avoids problems with ISV software
needing to be recertified on a new kernel, etc.
SUSE has issued fixes for all
A ps -A | grep mysqld reveals:
6563 ?00:00:00 safe_mysqld
6594 ?00:00:00 mysqld
6596 ?00:00:02 mysqld
6597 ?00:00:00 mysqld
So I appear to have multiple instances of mysqld running AS WELL as
safe_mysqld. Ghod only knows what people have been doing to my
They issued kernel 2.4.21-94 yesterday. What fix are you looking for?
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original Message-
From: Eric Sammons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kernel 2.4.24 available for SLES8?
James Tison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
/dev/dasda (major 94: minor 0) is reserved three partitions on it:
/dev/dasda1 (94:1), /dev/dasda2 (94:2), and /dev/dasda3 (94:3). Same scheme
for all the other physical DASD --- the minor value that mod 4 returns zero
on is the unit itself, the other
Service_pack_3 on SLES8 did upgrade the kernel from 2.4.19 to 2.4.21, so anything is
possible.
Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as gods. Cats have never forgotten
this. _ Anonymous
Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940
VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
--
From:
there was an update released yesterday. details :
Applies to
Product(s): SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 for IBM S/390 and IBM zSeries
Package: k_deflt
Release: 20040112
Obsoletes: none
Indications
This update should be installed.
Contraindications
This kernel requires
I really appreciate everyone's feedback on this topic.
It was a *big* help in planning out a few things.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] LVM usage between
Folks, any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated:
We currently run SuSE's SLES 8 31-bit. Would like to go 64-bit at some
point.
Has anyone migrated from SLES 8 31-bit to 64? Was it fairly straight
forward or was a lot of recompiling and reinstalling required?
Similarly, what is a
It seems that my security department is talking about some privilege
escalation vulnerability. I am still trying to get more information.
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
(804)697-3925
FRIT - Unix Systems
Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/14/2004 01:29 PM
there are several of vulnerabilities that are x86 specific. the one that
immediately comes to mind is the one that plagued the debian servers.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Sammons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Mer, 2004-01-14 at 18:17, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:16:34PM -0500, Eric Sammons wrote:
We are still working on our support contact so I am not sure I can get the
quick and dirty from SuSE yet, so I wonder does anyone in this group know
the availability status of
On Mer, 2004-01-14 at 17:23, Richard Troth wrote:
I was disappointed, if I read correctly,
that Xen required changes to the guest operating system.
Because Intel didn't design the CPU for virtualisation.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:03:25PM -0600, Little, Chris wrote:
there are several of vulnerabilities that are x86 specific. the one that
immediately comes to mind is the one that plagued the debian servers.
If you mean CAN-2003-0961, that vulnerability is not i386-specific, though
it only
thank you. i stand corrected.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.24 available for SLES8?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:03:25PM -0600, Little, Chris wrote:
there are
Here is the more exact finding our security group is concerned with:
There are 2 recently discovered Linux Kernel vulnerabilities that could
result in an attacker gaining elevated privileges on a Linux server. One
involves exploiting the kernel function do_mremap()--insufficient bounds
checking
SLES 8 kernel 2.4.21-94 seems to include the mremap problem:
|This This update fixes a security vulnerability in the Linux
|kernel (CAN-2003-0985) and contains additional fixes and IBM
|codedrops. The changes in detail are:
|
| Security fix
|
| * Add missing check in mremap (CAN-2003-0985)
I tried that and this is what I get
netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
10.38.135.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0
eth0
And I can Ping the Gateway
vmlinux:~ # ping -c 3 10.38.135.1
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:26, James Melin wrote:
A ps -A | grep mysqld reveals:
6563 ?00:00:00 safe_mysqld
6594 ?00:00:00 mysqld
6596 ?00:00:02 mysqld
6597 ?00:00:00 mysqld
I like mysql, but sometimes it can be a pita if the client libs
and server gen
I believe that 2.4.21-95 has the do_mremap() problem addressed. I have this
url from SuSE:
http://sdb.suse.de/download/s390x/update/SuSE-SLES/8/rpm/s390x/k_deflt-2.4.2
1-95.s390x.rpm
-Original Message-
From: Eric Sammons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:58
Hopefully one of the more Debian-literate people on the list can point me in
the right direction...
Every SHARE, we have a double installfest on Friday morning. We take 30 or
so Windows systems, and install Debian and then Red Hat on them. Everyone
seems to really like the hands-on aspect, but
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 06:36, Mark Post wrote:
part of the installation process asks if it should check for updates. It
would be nice if we had a local-to-the-lab APT server so that we could let
them see what that looks like, without killing the T1 connection.
So, can anyone point me to a
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:36:31AM -0500, Mark Post wrote:
Hopefully one of the more Debian-literate people on the list can point me in
the right direction...
Every SHARE, we have a double installfest on Friday morning. We take 30 or
so Windows systems, and install Debian and then Red Hat
52 matches
Mail list logo
