Now with more enemy-counfounding power than ever before, and at least
5% more friend amazement!
Version 0.4 of SysVInit for z/VM and VM/ESA is available at:
http://www.sinenomine.net/vm/s5i
This release contains the LIST RUNLEVELS command, as well as SERVICE
ADD/REMOVE. With the latter two, unles
If you are correct and it can be done at the filesystem level, then maybe you don't
even have to write a whole new one. I recall reading about the new ReiserFS 4 being
modular, maybe you could just write a plugin.
-jmc
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:06:18 -0700
"Fargusson.Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Thanks for all the info.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/17/2004 1:10:27 PM >>>
Or look at his very good presentation on the subject at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/altmarka/s9233a.pdf
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter
Webb, Toro
Or look at his very good presentation on the subject at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/altmarka/s9233a.pdf
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 1:06 PM
To: [EMAI
To do this, you need to enable PROXY ARP on VM TCP/IP. Check the VM list
archive http://listserv.uark.edu/archives/vmesa-l.html for posts from Alan
Altmark on PROXY ARP for intelligent explanations.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Griswold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 17, 2004 1
The Suse VM is on the same subnet on the same switch and is using ctc.
I believe our vm guy is going to try guest lan now. You have to excuse
my acsii art.
_
| NFS |
---|
Is PROXY ARP enabled in VM TCP/IP?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Griswold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 17, 2004 11:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VM Setup
Thanks for verifying that. So here is what I'm currently seeing.
During the install I can see the Linux installer
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 10:54, Doug Griswold wrote:
> Thanks for verifying that. So here is what I'm currently seeing.
> During the install I can see the Linux installer pinging my nfs server
> and it replys back but never reaches my Suse VM. I put a static route
> in the nfs server to point to the
>
> This takes us back to the wonderful world of Logical IOCS vs Physical IOCS. In the
> Mainframe world there as always been a diference between Logical I/O (the program's
> write of 80 bytes) and the Physical I/O (the writing of a 4K data block to a device
> by an operating system). In the PC
No, it's the routers between you and the VM system. Unless that last router
has a static route in it to pass the packet to the VM system, it will try to
do an arp. When it gets no reply, it will drop the packet. This is because
the IP address is in the same subnet as the router's NIC, so it will
It occurs to me that since the filesystem is what actually controls the buffer cache
that one could write a filesystem for Linux on VM that ignores the buffer cache and
does logical IOCS. Or maybe you need a DASD driver that does logical IOCS. The
filesystem would probably need to do something
Thanks for verifying that. So here is what I'm currently seeing.
During the install I can see the Linux installer pinging my nfs server
and it replys back but never reaches my Suse VM. I put a static route
in the nfs server to point to the VM4.3 machine for the IP of the Suse
install. This didn'
This takes us back to the wonderful world of Logical IOCS vs Physical IOCS. In the
Mainframe world there as always been a diference between Logical I/O (the program's
write of 80 bytes) and the Physical I/O (the writing of a 4K data block to a device by
an operating system). In the PC world wher
Yes. Look at the example in chapter 7 of the PerfKit documentation on
using action routines when a message matches a template, or in the
session on setting thresholds. The action routine can do pretty much
anything.
PerfKit makes a really nice scrolling console manager. Almost as cool as
VM:Operat
This has nothing to do with the "everything is a file" philosophy. It has to do with
the fact that most *ix systems don't have a layer below them to do buffering.
Actually even when you do the overhead of calling down to the driver for every write
would kill some systems.
Think about a progra
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 08:34, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I have one more question. In a ctc connection when going through the
> install the "Peer IP Address" is the address of the VM instance?
Yes.
> Also
> how do I get out of the mainframe if this is a point to point
> connection? Does VM have to
Is it possible to send notifications from RMF PM or z/VM Performance
Toolkit when thresholds are surpassed?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
We are finally going to install Linux on top of VM but we have run into
a small communication problem. We can't seem to get communications out
of the Mainframe. I can ping VM from the Suse installer and I can ping
myself. We are using a CTC connection. This should be a fairly easy
problem to fi
> Phil, that's a normal idiotic diagnostic message. It's also written to
be as insulting as possible to the user. For myself IE has been
throwing those for a longish while now. Office products have been
behaving themselves for a while now.
http://www.isham-research.com/dd.html - see "error mesage"
Ranga Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are on STK V2X DASD array. We can do very well without Linux adding
>further caching. Is there a way to tell Linux not to cache the DASD?
As David said, there's apparently no way to turn this off. For several
years, I've been asking folks this same ques
20 matches
Mail list logo
