> A reference was made to Oracle/DB2/WebSphere being resource
> intensive "Then, the big stuff started to become available.
> DB2, Oracle, Websphere. One copy can take multiple IFL engines .."
>
> My follow up question on this is: in terms of resource
> requirements, would you treat MySQL as being
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
Glenn Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
07/21/2005 04:13 PM
Please respond to
Linux
Glenn Nicholas wrote:
Thanks for the responses, much appreciated.
A reference was made to Oracle/DB2/WebSphere being resource intensive
"Then, the big stuff started to become available. DB2, Oracle,
Websphere. One copy can take multiple IFL engines .."
My follow up question on this is: in ter
I would expect MySQL to be somewhat more miserly in resource
consumption. Of course the old axiom, YMMV (your mileage may vary),
will greatly apply here. Any database, vendor or open source, will run
great, if it is well tuned.
I've heard good things about JBoss and Tomcat, but alot of that rea
On Gwe, 2005-07-22 at 07:13 +0800, Glenn Nicholas wrote:
> My follow up question on this is: in terms of resource requirements,
> would you treat MySQL as being roughly equivalent to Oracle/DB2?
At what task - that bit is important.
For example sqlite is incredibly quick and efficient and blows
Thanks for the responses, much appreciated.
A reference was made to Oracle/DB2/WebSphere being resource intensive
"Then, the big stuff started to become available. DB2, Oracle,
Websphere. One copy can take multiple IFL engines .."
My follow up question on this is: in terms of resource requirem
> I got a bit confused with this discussion (it does happen
> quite often).
> I was thinking DB2-Distributed Services (not DB2 Connect).
> We can't move DB2 out of zOS. The reason is simple, zLinux
> does not have work load manager and we hit that database
> heavily with both On-line and batch use
> I have been tasked with creating 2 master systems for cloning
> SUSE 9 running on z/VM 510. One on 3390-3 and another on a 2G LUN.
> I do not want everything in a single partition. Are there any
> recommendations/suggestions for this?
Correct. Separate /boot, ,/, /usr, /etc and /var for certain
David:
I got a bit confused with this discussion (it does happen quite often).
I was thinking DB2-Distributed Services (not DB2 Connect).
We can't move DB2 out of zOS. The reason is simple, zLinux does not have
work load manager and we hit that database heavily with both On-line and
batch users.
> Assuming DB2 stays under zOS in a z890 MF with both zOS and
> zLinux (no zVM)
> LPAR's:
> What are the benefits of moving the DB2-Connect functions out
> of zOS and into a zLinux image in the same MF?
Faster development (much of the hard stuff for implementing solutions on
z/OS already exists on
I have been tasked with creating 2 master systems for cloning SUSE 9
running on z/VM 510. One on 3390-3 and another on a 2G LUN.
I do not want everything in a single partition. Are there any
recommendations/suggestions for this?
How many partitions should I create and what should they contain?
A
Hello, everyone.
I've noticed a somewhat disturbing error message that is generated on
our SLES 8 (31 bit) guests utilizing FCP scsi drives whenever the
command "hwscan --disk" is run. These errors are always replicatable if
the zfcp, scsi_mod and sd_mod drivers are loaded and an FCP disk is
defin
Assuming DB2 stays under zOS in a z890 MF with both zOS and zLinux (no zVM)
LPAR's:
What are the benefits of moving the DB2-Connect functions out of zOS and
into a zLinux image in the same MF?
Would this move save zOS CPU cycles?
Would stability be the same as under zOS?
why are people doing it?
O
Yes I have.. Been waiting since Tuesday afternoon.. No response yet...
Not too happy about their service at the moment..
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
We running DB2 Connect in SuSE SLES 8 31 bit, using a hipersocket to zOS. It
seems to work fine, other than the fact that the distributed person that set up
Connect pointed it at LPARs in both CECs, so that every other request is
processed outside the box and returned. We're working on fixing th
Have you contacted SuSE about the problems you're having? If there's
something wrong with the update process, you should get them involved so
that others don't have to go through this. After all, that's why you paid
them for a maintenance agreement.
> Does anyone have DB2 Connect running on RHEL 3 on zSeries?
Yeah. You're already past the hard part since you have figured out how to
buy it.
> Any comment or experience on running DB2 Connect (31-bit or
> 64-bit) and on distributions other than Red Hat is appreciated.
Works as documented. No p
There should be a script /etc/init.d/sshd. In most distros, you can enable it
to auto start with:
chkconfig --level 35 sshd on
(By tradition, level 3 is multi-user with no GUI, level 5 auto starts xdm.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sorry I thought autho = authorization not auto. Mine is started by an
init script. What does chkconfig report?
-Original Message-
Yes that is the config file... What auto starts ssh...
Because I have to start it manually..
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Grega Bremec
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:45 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Security questions and scads of NOUSER based SSH attacks
>
>
> Apart from what everybody else suggest
Yes that is the config file... What auto starts ssh...
Because I have to start it manually..
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neale Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:30 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Online update
> Then, the big stuff started to become available. DB2, Oracle,
> Websphere. One copy can take multiple IFL engines (366 MIPS
> each with a limit of 32 engines on a z/990).
To be correct, a z890 IFL (or full capacity CP) is around 366
MIPS and for a 4-processor z890 that comes to 1365 MIPS. A z990
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
-Original Message-
Ok..another quest..
Where is the autho for ssh..
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-39
Hello from Gregg C Levine
This is all good advice, I'll probably need to dig up documentation on
iptables, and go on from there.
And as it happens this is a relatively new system so I am the only
user. But yes, people who do get permission to access my systems do
need to choose non dictionary word
And I must add for our case: We do not consider booting from a LVM-volume.
We just want to put large Mdisks in a LVM-volume group (i.e. for large
DB's).
Nonetheless we had to tu run mkrdinit and zipl after that for re-boot SLES9
properly (as Stefan in a former note pointed out ...).
Thanks to Ha
25 matches
Mail list logo
