Mark Post wrote:
>I downloaded the software for git (the new source management tool for
>Linux kernel developers) to compile it on Linux/390. Everything seemed
>to go well. I'm curious, though, if anyone knows for sure if the Linux
>kernel source repository has moved from Bitkeeper to git, or no
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:10:51PM +0300, Pasi Pirhonen wrote:
> That's weird as the primary development platform for it is hercules.
> I have not been able to get LCS working under hercules (haven't even
> tried long time tho), but i use CTC myself and have even done test
> installation with these
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Mark, when I was building my Slackware kernels from raw kernel source
code, rather then from the stuff provided by the company I'd visit
www.kernel.org to let me know what the newest revision for either the
2.2 series or for that matter which version of the 2.4 series was
I downloaded the software for git (the new source management tool for
Linux kernel developers) to compile it on Linux/390. Everything seemed
to go well. I'm curious, though, if anyone knows for sure if the Linux
kernel source repository has moved from Bitkeeper to git, or not? If
so, where would
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:25:49AM -0500, Jay Maynard wrote:
> I'm trying to install CentOS 4.2 on Hercules. (About time, eh?) I got the
> DVD image downloaded, mounted, and IPLed, but when I try to tell the
> installer about the network, it either doesn't find the interface (if I use
> CTC)
James,
Sorry for the delay in getting to this question - was in an all-day
meeting yesterday.
> The methodology in that book creates essentially a 2 disk system. A
system
> and a page disk. That is bad of course
Yes, I understand that argument. We used a one volume root file system
under the he
I'm trying to install CentOS 4.2 on Hercules. (About time, eh?) I got the
DVD image downloaded, mounted, and IPLed, but when I try to tell the
installer about the network, it either doesn't find the interface (if I use
CTC) or panics (while loading the LCS module). Is this a known problem?
FWIW, I
I suppose leaving the definition embedded in Linux someplace is not a bad
thing - as some day I'm probably gonna want to use that golden master to
propagate updates with a copy/overlay rather than a copy to clean FS.
"Post, Mark K"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m>
