There are 3 flavors of DB2 nowadays
DB2 for VM and VSE
DB2/UDB (all ascii platforms)
DB2/ for z/OS
All DB2/UDBs have the same code base. Some hardware differences, but
have the same features.
DB2 for z/OS has a large subset of DB2/UDB, PLUS unique things for the
big MVS guys.
There use to
On 5/24/07, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Thursday, 05/24/2007 at 08:48 ZE8, John Summerfield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For some of us, the only interesting VM is one we are permitted to run
>> under Hercules:-)
>
> :-) Beauty. Beholder. But I can
>>> On 5/24/2007 at 9:14 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "McKown,
John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Mark Post
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:49 AM
>> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
>> Subject: R
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 05/24/2007 at 08:48 ZE8, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some of us, the only interesting VM is one we are permitted to run
under Hercules:-)
:-) Beauty. Beholder. But I can't abide anyone calling VM/370 "normal
VM". Them thar's fightin' w
On Thursday, 05/24/2007 at 10:36 AST, Mike Hammock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Now don't be so hard on VM/370 Alan... The first VM I worked on as a
> Sysprog was VM/370 ver 2, so I tend to have a soft place in my heart for
> it...
Who's being hard on VM/370? It is a fine representation of the
IBM has a DB2 product positioning paper that outlines the differences.
Maybe one of the IBMers on here can post that? Not sure if I'm allowed to
or not - although nothing in it is marked confidential.
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are
I had an instructor once who used to insist "that the only stupid
question is the one that does not get asked".
Dave
Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/22/2007 7:36 AM >>>
Hi, John.
No such thing as a stu
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:14 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Goodwin, Derric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curious,
>
> We just installed a new 64 Bit SLES9 guest and everything seems to be
> working with one exception...
>
> When we run the ID command against a user id after a little
Goodwin, Derric wrote:
> Curious,
>
> We just installed a new 64 Bit SLES9 guest and everything seems to be
> working with one exception...
>
> When we run the ID command against a user id after a little churning the
> system kicks back a "Bus Error".
>
> Has anyone seen this before?
>
> Thoughts?
Oops, you're right HZ is 100 not 1000.
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 17:35 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:28 -0400, Brad Hinson wrote:
> > itimer is based on jiffies, so the granularity should be 1 millisecond
> > (HZ=1000/s) in kernel space. I haven't tested this, though. A
Curious,
We just installed a new 64 Bit SLES9 guest and everything seems to be
working with one exception...
When we run the ID command against a user id after a little churning the
system kicks back a "Bus Error".
Has anyone seen this before?
Thoughts?
Thanks all.
---
Derric Goodwin
Distrib
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 11:28 -0400, Brad Hinson wrote:
> itimer is based on jiffies, so the granularity should be 1 millisecond
> (HZ=1000/s) in kernel space. I haven't tested this, though. Are you
> seeing something different?
HZ is 100 on s390 so the granularity is 10 milliseconds.
--
blue ski
itimer is based on jiffies, so the granularity should be 1 millisecond
(HZ=1000/s) in kernel space. I haven't tested this, though. Are you
seeing something different?
-Brad
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 16:02 -0500, Roach, Dennis wrote:
> Does anyone know what the granularity of itimer is on a z900 (RH
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Post
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:49 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: OK - a really stupid question.
>
>
> It's not me that wants them, it's the customers and IBM
> employe
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 6:47 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sergey
Korzhevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 23.05.2007 19:40:26 Mark Post wrote:
>
> Hi Mark.
>
> What "features" do you mean? I always think that z/os db2 everytime far
> behind pc/db2.
It's not me that wants them, it's
Now don't be so hard on VM/370 Alan... The first VM I worked on as a
Sysprog was VM/370 ver 2, so I tend to have a soft place in my heart for
it...
Of course, we have come a long ways since then. ;-)
Mike
C. M. (Mike) Hammock
Sr. Technical Support
zFrame & IBM zSeries Solutions
(404) 64
On Thursday, 05/24/2007 at 08:48 ZE8, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some of us, the only interesting VM is one we are permitted to run
> under Hercules:-)
:-) Beauty. Beholder. But I can't abide anyone calling VM/370 "normal
VM". Them thar's fightin' woids!
Alan Altmark
Alan Altmark wrote:
I am looking at furthering my interests in things Linux and certainly
z/VM and regular VM,
z/VM *is* "regular VM". :-)
For some of us, the only interesting VM is one we are permitted to run
under Hercules:-)
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
On Tuesday, 05/22/2007 at 01:39 AST, Gregg Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> According to what I remember from earlier discussions, a 9672 family
> member is a 32 bit machine, and can only run releases of z/VM leading
> up to probably 4.4. And amongst the Linux distributions out there,
> only one
23.05.2007 19:40:26 Mark Post wrote:
Hi Mark.
What "features" do you mean? I always think that z/os db2 everytime far
behind pc/db2.
>Now, if the version of DB2 that is available for Linux would only be
upgraded
>to have all the features and functionality of the z/OS version, it would
be
>much
20 matches
Mail list logo