There was a normal shutdown of RHEL 5 on Friday, but today:
Waiting for driver initialization.
Scanning and configuring dmraid supported devices
Scanning logical volumes
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
Couldn't find device with uuid
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
It seemed that the chccwdev command finished asynchronously.
chccwdev does not finish asynchronously.
If chccwdev returns the device driver completed its online/offline
processing. The problem you try to solve is, that some things are
Looks like some disks (dasd or fcp) aren't being seen. What was the
reason for the reboot today? Were any disks recently added?
-Justin
On 04/26/2010 09:00 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
There was a normal shutdown of RHEL 5 on Friday, but today:
Waiting for driver initialization.
Scanning
I had to re-register server at Novell.
http://www.novell.com/support/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexterna
lId=3303599sliceId=SAL_PublicdialogID=49139291stateId=1%200%204418672
I had similar issues when I had done SP1 to SP2 upgrades.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
Sebastian,
Thanks for your complete reply. I will look into your questions and post
back
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
My best guess (having tested this theory several times personally) is that
you added several disks (maybe two?) to the system and added them into LVM
groups, but forgot to edit modprobe.conf and execute the mkinitrd and zipl
following the additions.
This is guaranteed to give varying weird
You might have something there...I'll investigate.
Thanks,
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
RPN01
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:46 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Monday for RHEL 5
My best
Does anybody knows the usage and purpose of the following users and groups.
Users:
suse-ncc:x:102:105:Novell Customer Center
User:/var/lib/YaST2/suse-ncc-fakehome:/bin/bash
hacluster:x:90:90:heartbeat
processes:/var/lib/heartbeat/cores/hacluster:/bin/false
messagebus:x:100:101:User for
Below is the announcement for RHEL 6 beta, released this past
Wednesday.
It's currently available on RHN (https://rhn.redhat.com).
Brad, does this release contain the IMA fixes that correctly decrement use
counters on exit? If not, is there a suggested procedure to disable IMA or keep
it
Brad Hinson bhin...@redhat.com wrote:
Below is the announcement for RHEL 6 beta, released this past Wednesday.
It's currently available on RHN (https://rhn.redhat.com).
be careful, The CTC (channel-to-channel) and IUCV (inter-user communication
vehicle) are deprecated and are not supported
I am trying to find a working RPM for Regina. We are running SLES 11 on
z/VM. I thought I read it was included in the SDK but it is not showing
up.
Thanks,
Mark Workman
Shelter Insurance Companies
573.214.4672
mwork...@shelterinsurance.com
This e-mail is intended only for its addressee and
On 4/26/2010 at 03:11 PM, Mark Workman mwork...@shelterinsurance.com
wrote:
I am trying to find a working RPM for Regina. We are running SLES 11 on
z/VM. I thought I read it was included in the SDK but it is not showing
up.
It was inadvertently left out of the SLES11 GA SDK. It will be
Thanks for the quick reply.
Do you know of any Regina PRMs that will work on SLES 11?
Thanks again,
Mark Workman
Shelter Insurance Companies
573.214.4672
mwork...@shelterinsurance.com
From: Mark Post mp...@novell.com
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 04/26/2010 02:52 PM
Subject:
You can build your own RPM from the source.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Mark Workman mwork...@shelterinsurance.com
wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Do you know of any Regina PRMs that will work on SLES 11?
Thanks again,
Mark Workman
Shelter Insurance Companies
573.214.4672
On 4/26/2010 at 03:57 PM, Mark Workman mwork...@shelterinsurance.com
wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Do you know of any Regina PRMs that will work on SLES 11?
As Mark Pace pointed out, you could build your own from source. However, this
is now one built on SLES11 at
The CTC (channel-to-channel) and IUCV (inter-user communication
vehicle) are deprecated ...
Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this?
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
--
For LINUX-390
On 4/26/2010 at 04:19 PM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this?
For the installation process?
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive
On 04/26/2010 10:19 PM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
The CTC (channel-to-channel) and IUCV (inter-user communication
vehicle) are deprecated ...
Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this?
It's a IBM request.
see:
On 04/26/2010 10:32 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On 4/26/2010 at 04:19 PM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this?
For the installation process?
SuSE is not too far:
On 4/26/2010 at 04:41 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a IBM request.
Hopefully everyone realizes that when stuff like this is dropped (and
particularly when both SLES and RHEL are dropping it), it's an IBM decision.
Sometimes those decisions are made sooner than
On 4/26/2010 at 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/26/2010 10:32 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On 4/26/2010 at 04:19 PM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this?
For the installation process?
Where I did initially like IUCV and VCTCA, both methods are Point to Point on
an IP network. (it seemed simplier) It violates all the standard networking
laws.
Every time I showed our IP setup to the network people, they were just confused
and I didn't know why.
But in z/VM 5.2, support was
On Monday, 04/26/2010 at 05:11 EDT, Tom Duerbusch
duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
But in z/VM 5.2, support was dropped for IUCV and VCTCA on an IP
network.
Huh? z/VM still continues to support IUCV and CTC (virtual or otherwise)
IP connections. Heck, we still support HYPERchannels and CLAW.
On Tue, April 27, 2010 08:52, Mark Post wrote:
On 4/26/2010 at 04:41 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a IBM request.
Hopefully everyone realizes that when stuff like this is dropped (and
particularly when both SLES and RHEL are dropping it), it's an IBM
decision.
24 matches
Mail list logo
