Hehe, you are funny :)
I know, we can handle that part, but s, don't tell anyone :)
No seriously, it is ok for our purpose.
We can prove only one zLinux running as root have read-access to
the specified disks. They have to be available to z/VM, and they are
not now, so we cant just read all
I forgot, you also need to:
/etc/init.d/network start
before starting sshd
/Tore
_
Tore Agblad
System programmer, Volvo IT certified IT Architect
Volvo Information Technology
Infrastructure Mainframe Design Development, Linux servers
Dept
Sorry for my slow mind here:
If the network is trashed and you have IUCVTTY terminal server support
in place you can start that entry you have in inittab manually
as well.
And login that way, it's much easier to fix things via a normal xterm.
For example:
/usr/bin/iucvtty lnxhvc1 -- /bin/login
On Thursday, 06/09/2011 at 04:15 EDT, Scott Rohling
scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
Implementing the driver isn't an auditable offense.. gaining access to
the
volume through a DEDICATE or LINK, etc is another story - but that
shouldn't
discourage use of the driver. I see little difference
If that's the case - you don't grant access. I am objecting to the
automatic assumption that there's a security problem because someone wants
to use a driver to read a z/OS volume. Just as if I have a confidential
file on my 191 disk.. I don't grant access even if the rest of the files
are
Hi,
I have a script rexx in zVM and I need execute it from Linux, How is this
possible? How I can send commands CMS from linux (or send Linux commands
from z/VM) , I know the command vmcp, but it only for command CP.
Thanks
Fábio Paim
Analista de sistemas
On Friday, 06/10/2011 at 10:19 EDT, Scott Rohling
scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
If that's the case - you don't grant access. I am objecting to the
automatic assumption that there's a security problem because someone
wants
to use a driver to read a z/OS volume. Just as if I have a
Hi Fabio,
Once you are running linux you can't execute CMS commands. This is because
you're not running CMS anymore. So if you need to run a rexx you need to
rewrite it to a bash script. And obviously you can't have CMS commands in the
bash script.
Regards, Berry.
-Original Message-
On 6/10/2011 at 10:40 AM, Fábio Paimfabaop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a script rexx in zVM and I need execute it from Linux, How is this
possible? How I can send commands CMS from linux (or send Linux commands
from z/VM) , I know the command vmcp, but it only for command CP.
Are you
Thanks for all response,
I have one bash script on Linux, and one step of this script, I need to call
a REXX on Z/VM.
Fabio.
2011/6/10 Mark Post mp...@novell.com
On 6/10/2011 at 10:40 AM, Fábio Paimfabaop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a script rexx in zVM and I need execute it from
On 6/10/2011 at 11:19 AM, Fábio Paimfabaop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have one bash script on Linux, and one step of this script, I need to call
a REXX on Z/VM.
To my knowledge, the only thing IBM officially supports would be an rexec call
to a service virtual machine. Sine Nomine Associates
The ssh add-on only works when CMS initiates the connection. What does the
command do on the CMS side? Are you expecting data back from it?
On 6/10/11 11:30 AM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 6/10/2011 at 11:19 AM, Fábio Paimfabaop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have one bash script on Linux,
You will have to rely on another (CMS) guest issuing the REXX .. it could be
as simple as:
vmcp xautolog cmsguest#dorexx(xautolog cmsguest and pass parm dorexx
so that DOREXX is executed)
If the last thing DOREXX does is logoff -- you can use vmcp q user cmsguest
to check if it's done or
Thanks,
I guess it can help me. Thanks a lot.
2011/6/10 Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com
You will have to rely on another (CMS) guest issuing the REXX .. it could
be
as simple as:
vmcp xautolog cmsguest#dorexx(xautolog cmsguest and pass parm
dorexx
so that DOREXX is
I am working with a client and the question arose about if this could be
done:
Clients FTP data to one of two hosts.
If one host is down they actually update the DNS server entry to point the
down host to the other (backup) hostname
Is there a way to setup the DNS so that both host ip addresses
/etc/fstab only gets read when the mount command is run, which is only at boot
time unless you run it yourself after you edit the fstab file. It's that way
-Original Message-
From: Scott Rohling [mailto:scott.rohl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Why
What you describe is easy to do and is common practice for some
network services.
Even without a load balancer, you can have hostname www point to
two different machines. I would do it with multiple A records in the
DNS. Protocols like HTTP carry out a complete transaction nicely that
way.
[Sorry, message got sent prematurely. ]
/etc/fstab gets read only when the mount command is run, which is only at boot
time unless you run it yourself after you edit the fstab file. It's that way
on every Unix variant I've dealt with. That's why it's one of the classic Unix
time bombs.
If
Yes it just involves another entry with the additional address. However the
addresses would normally be used in a round robin fashion.
Example for BIND:
server1A 172.68.1.1
A 172.68.1.2
-
Kevin George
U.S. Office of Personnel
On Friday, 06/10/2011 at 04:23 EDT, Lionel Dyck/Oakland/IBM@IBMUS wrote:
Is there a way to setup the DNS so that both host ip addresses are
defined
for a single hostname?
Yes [see Rick's post], but that likely isn't going to do what you want.
Most end-user client applications are simplistic,
20 matches
Mail list logo
