Re: Anyone lose network connectivity during upgrade to SLES11 SP1

2012-02-09 Thread Marcy Cortes
Ah, you are right! I must have looked at a sles 10 server! Glad it was useful, though! Marcy -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Ron Foster at Baldor-IS Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:52 PM To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re

Re: Anyone lose network connectivity during upgrade to SLES11 SP1

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
Tobias, Yes the default route was pointing to an interface that used the long form of the interface name. It appears that SLES11 SP1 does not use that form of the interface name any more. Ron From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf

Re: Anyone lose network connectivity during upgrade to SLES11 SP1

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
Marcy, Thanks for the info. It appears that on SLES11SP1 the name of the file changed to 70-persistent-net.rules Thanks for giving the information on where the rules files are. Ron From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy Co

Re: Anyone lose network connectivity during upgrade to SLES11 SP1

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
Mark, Back in deep dark ancient history, if you had a Linux system with multiple interfaces, you had to put the device name you on the default route or you got an error message at boot up. It looks like that has changed. When I put a - for the device name, I no longer get the message when I bo

ksoftirqd using 100% CPU

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
Hello listers, Last night I upgraded one of the Linux guests used by our developers to kernel level 2.6.16.60-0.95.1-default. (Latest SLES10 SP4 kernel) By about 11:30 AM this morning, I was getting complaints from our developers that the system was hanging. Looking around, I saw that ksoftirq

Re:

2012-02-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 02/09/2012 at 09:45 EST, "Herczeg, Zoltan" wrote: > DEFINE LINK,ID=HIPER-B04,TYPE=OSAX,DEV=B04,DATAPATH=B0F,MTU=8192, - > PORTNAME=HIPER-B04,FRAGMENT=NO,IPADDR=9.52.1.24 If you want to use MTU of 8192, Make sure the CHPARM for the HiperSocket chpid is set to 16K since (MTU = MFS-8192

[no subject]

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Wells
HIPERLEE MTU 57344 >> what I have on my z/OS to VM/linux From: Rich Smrcina To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 02/09/2012 08:57 AM Subject:Re: Sent by:Linux on 390 Port Is your hipersocket set up to use an 8K MTU? What is the MTU size on the Linux side? On 02/09/

[no subject]

2012-02-09 Thread Rich Smrcina
Is your hipersocket set up to use an 8K MTU? What is the MTU size on the Linux side? On 02/09/2012 08:37 AM, Herczeg, Zoltan wrote: Hi all. I am new to linux and looking for some help. I have an ifl on a z/10 running the latest z/vm on DS8100 dasd. I installed Suse sles11 and installed a

[no subject]

2012-02-09 Thread Herczeg, Zoltan
Hi all. I am new to linux and looking for some help. I have an ifl on a z/10 running the latest z/vm on DS8100 dasd. I installed Suse sles11 and installed a z/VSE product from IBM which runs on linux and allows you to create virtual tapes on a linux file system. This product uses tcpip to tr