Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 2/2/06, Phil Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only one server would attempt (according to the application developer)
to write to any specific file so file level locking would not be required.
You're right that the NFS server would be a single point of failure.
Rea
> I suggested running an NFS server but there was a concern of
> this being a single point of failure.
AFS. GPFS. Lustre. CFS.
All deal much better with takeover after/during a failure.
> Does anyone have a method of sharing a VM resource in R/W
> mode amongst linux quests?
If they're all
On 2/2/06, Phil Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only one server would attempt (according to the application developer)
> to write to any specific file so file level locking would not be required.
You're right that the NFS server would be a single point of failure.
Real solutions come with a pr
I am in the process of building a cluster of servers the where the
application being deployed would gain a significant performance benefit
if the linux guests could share a filesystem where each server would
write small (less than 2k each) status files onto this shared space.
Only one server wou
