On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 12:12 PM Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) <
larry.dav...@dxc.com> wrote:
> We are seeing an Issue when Using Hipersockets connected to a DB2 system
> on z/OS
>
> When we perform a VMRELOCATE (LGR) to another member in the complex we
> lose the HS device and it goes
On 4/20/21 2:04 PM, Stefan Raspl wrote:
> This is really a shot in the dark, but: Could it be a case where the
> device number from source and target system are different, and you have
> the target system's device IDs on the cio ignore list prior to the
> migration? I.e. what happens in case you
About LGR and Hipersocket using RHEL 7.7
Larry,
If this isn't resolved, I'd suggest you open a z/VM support case and the team
and take a closer look.
Thanks,
Bill
___
Bill Bitner - z/VM Client Focus and Care
Hi Larry,
On 4/8/21 6:11 PM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
We are seeing an Issue when Using Hipersockets connected to a DB2 system on z/OS
When we perform a VMRELOCATE (LGR) to another member in the complex we lose the
HS device and it goes offline
The Relocate works fine the
Larry,
If this isn't resolved, I'd suggest you open a z/VM support case and the
team and take a closer look.
Thanks,
Bill
___
Bill Bitner - z/VM Client Focus and Care - 607-429-3286
bitn...@us.ibm.com
"Making
We are seeing an Issue when Using Hipersockets connected to a DB2 system on z/OS
When we perform a VMRELOCATE (LGR) to another member in the complex we lose the
HS device and it goes offline
The Relocate works fine the HS devices have the same EQID and we see the
devices attached on the
