Then there is reputed to be floating around the Internet a slash-n-burn
version of JCL, still very much in alpha.
You could get ahold of that and turn it into a real JCL, tying it in with
some of the utilities mentioned in the earlier replies, and just forget about
the Linuxisms side of
Using a make file to script the compiles that are required will help
serialize a user's compilations. You can use a flag to increase levels of
parallelism if required. You can do this to put them into the background:
make -f makefile name make.log
To get a bitmore fancy, use the nice command
one thing you can do it giving multiple linux to your developers.
eventually you could give each developer a linux. VM will then distribute the
priorities according to the share settings.
this is a new approach far different from MVS
regards,
Herve
-Original Message-
From: McKown,
, March 20, 2003 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
Using a make file to script the compiles that are required will help
serialize a user's compilations. You can use a flag to increase levels of
parallelism if required. You can do this to put them into the background:
make
The 'standard' way is to build a makefile for the compiles, and run
make.
Another suggestion, and I'm new at this, is to code a quicky Rexx
(Regina) script. You should be able to do the compiles, check return
codes, and e-mail yourself the results. At least this is the kind of
thing I do on VM
otherwise be shared (is that 100Mhz timer pop still a problem with
Linux/390 zLinux?)
-Original Message-
From: Herve Bonvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE : batch compiles
one thing you can do it giving multiple linux
You could code up a shell/perl script called make which takes the
arguments of the real make, sticks them in an array or something, and calls
the real make for each item in the array 5 at a time or whatever till it's
done.
Hrm, maybe I just ported JES to Linux
Uh Oh.
Jay Brenneman
: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE : batch compiles
That's a possibility. I can then control the evil ones by changing their VM
dispatching priority. My only concern is the extra overhead of running multiple Linux
On Thursday, 03/20/2003 at 08:10 CST, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with using make is that I must know *in advance* which
programs I want to compile and then code a make file for that set of
programs. What I want to do is more like:
Edit program1
Submit program1 to
this conceptual problem. Of course, they'll be asking: Where is VB? How do
you expect me to write programs without VB?
-Original Message-
From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
snip
The Linux Way
McKown, John writes:
OK, so I have a corrupted mindset, coming from MVS grin. But suppose that
I want to compile a LOT of programs. In MVS, I code up some JCL and submit
it to run later. When it completes, I get a notify to my TSO id and look at
the output in SDSF. I repeat this for however
oriented questions. Gotta love diverse communities.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Beattie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
-snip-
I'm surprised I haven't yet seen anyone else mention the batch
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, McKown, John wrote:
OK, so I have a corrupted mindset, coming from MVS grin. But suppose that
I want to compile a LOT of programs. In MVS, I code up some JCL and submit
it to run later. When it completes, I get a notify to my TSO id and look at
the output in SDSF. I
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:10:36 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with using make is that I must know *in advance* which
programs I want to compile and then code a make file for that set of
programs. What I want to do is more like:
Edit program1
Submit program1 to compile
, March 20, 2003 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
Using a make file to script the compiles that are required will help
serialize a user's compilations. You can use a flag to
increase levels of
parallelism if required. You can do this to put them into the
background
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
snip
You might also equip everyone with their own quad Xeon running Linux,
Hercules and Linux/390.
DROOLING BIG TIME ME
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: batch compiles
snip
You might also equip everyone with their own quad Xeon running
17 matches
Mail list logo
