Re: Please read if you use TSM on Linux for system z

Looks like the link was broken in my original e-mail You can use the following by cut/pasting into your browser: www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=128520 Or you can search for RFE ID: 128520 -- For

Please read if you use TSM on Linux for system z

Cross-posted to Linux-390 and IBMVM lists Those of you who use TSM as a backup/archive software for Linux on z clients should be aware of a major deficiency that has been introduced since TSM version 8.1.2. IBM has implemented "enhanced security" for TSM and in the process disabl

Re: TSM client - DSMC interface hung

The below email is classified: Internal Hello, If someone is planning to run TSM client > v 6.4.3 on z14, then ask IBM to provide you gskcrypt and gskssl package at least 8.0.50.84. It fixed the issue. Thanks, Mariusz -Original Message- From: Mariusz Walczak Sent: Wednesday, Ma

Re: TSM client - DSMC interface hung

-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert J Brenneman Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 5:03 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM client - DSMC interface hung Check your gskit version : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI90141 Theres a known issue with certain gskit versions

Re: TSM client - DSMC interface hung

on the current version if the software product has not delivered an update with the new gskit version included. The details of the workaround vary by software product - open a PMR against TSM client and they will steer you towards the best solution in your case. On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Mariusz

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

On Friday, 02/12/2016 at 02:48 GMT, Robert J Brenneman wrote: > Maybe I'm unimaginative, but I can't think of a network topology where the > defaults make sense. > > What is this set of defaults supposed to /make easier/ ? I believe the answer is buried here: >> This may

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

inux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mauro Souza Sent: den 10 februari 2016 4:59 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem Any chance you have more than one LPAR, and they have the same MACPREFIX? We had some strange issues here too, when

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

n-gb/ > > > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Mauro Souza > Sent: den 10 februari 2016 4:59 > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem > > Any chance you have more than on

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

On Tuesday, 02/09/2016 at 04:16 GMT, Robert J Brenneman wrote: > Multi homed linux seems to consider any MAC address as good as any other > when responding to an ARP. The default seems to assume you have every > ethernet port plugged to the same logical network. If you run

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

uari 2016 4:43 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem On Tuesday, 02/09/2016 at 04:16 GMT, Robert J Brenneman <bren...@gmail.com> wrote: > Multi homed linux seems to consider any MAC address as good as any other > when responding to an ARP. The default

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

lf Of > Alan Altmark > Sent: den 11 februari 2016 4:43 > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem > > On Tuesday, 02/09/2016 at 04:16 GMT, Robert J Brenneman > <bren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Multi homed linux seems to consider any MAC

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

.com http://www.volvo.com/volvoit/global/en-gb/ -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert J Brenneman Sent: den 9 februari 2016 5:14 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem Multi homed linux s

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

gt; E-mail: tore.agb...@volvo.com > http://www.volvo.com/volvoit/global/en-gb/ > > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Robert J Brenneman > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 5:14 > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: R

TSM backup LAN connection problem

Hi, just a long shot perhaps, checking if anyone else have had this problem and solved it: Two Linux servers running TSM(backup server) software, one x86 and on s390x (RHEL 6.7) Both have an extra NIC connected to a separate backup LAN, separate OSA adapters + separate cables all the way

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

02-09 4:04 GMT-05:00 Agblad Tore <tore.agb...@volvo.com>: > Hi, just a long shot perhaps, checking if anyone else have had this > problem and solved it: > > Two Linux servers running TSM(backup server) software, one x86 and on > s390x (RHEL 6.7) > > Both have an extra N

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

gt;: > > > Hi, just a long shot perhaps, checking if anyone else have had this > > problem and solved it: > > > > Two Linux servers running TSM(backup server) software, one x86 and on > > s390x (RHEL 6.7) > > > > Both have an extra NIC connected to a separate

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 09:04 +, Agblad Tore wrote: > Hi, just a long shot perhaps, checking if anyone else have had this problem > and solved it: > > Two Linux servers running TSM(backup server) software, one x86 and on s390x > (RHEL 6.7) > > Both have an extra NIC co

Re: TSM backup LAN connection problem

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 11:13 -0500, Robert J Brenneman wrote: > Multi homed linux seems to consider any MAC address as good as any other > when responding to an ARP. The default seems to assume you have every > ethernet port plugged to the same logical network. If you run tcpdump on > all

Re: TSM server

TSM servers with TSM release 5.5 and were happy with performance and memory consumption. We backed-up 100s of servers a night using a z10 processor with multiple IFLs. Once we upgraded to TSM 6.1, the memory consumption became prohibitive (8+ GB). We kept increasing the memory

Re: TSM server

Thanks for posting this problem Craig. We were about to obtain some new hardware as part of our upgrade plans including TSM on zLinux. It doesn't sound like this is worth pursuing in light of your problems. But, I have to say it is not entirely unexpected. It seems like one part of IBM doesn't

Re: TSM server

We were using zLinux to host TSM servers with TSM release 5.5 and were happy with performance and memory consumption. We backed-up 100s of servers a night using a z10 processor with multiple IFLs. Once we upgraded to TSM 6.1, the memory consumption became prohibitive (8+ GB). We kept increasing

Re: TSM server

On 3/8/11 8:51 AM, Craig Collins grizl...@gmail.com wrote: We were using zLinux to host TSM servers with TSM release 5.5 and were happy with performance and memory consumption. We backed-up 100s of servers a night using a z10 processor with multiple IFLs. Once we upgraded to TSM 6.1, the memory

Re: TSM server

Subject: Re: TSM server We were using zLinux to host TSM servers with TSM release 5.5 and were happy with performance and memory consumption. We backed-up 100s of servers a night using a z10 processor with multiple IFLs. Once we upgraded to TSM 6.1, the memory consumption became prohibitive (8+ GB

Re: TSM server

On Tuesday, 03/08/2011 at 08:51 EST, Craig Collins grizl...@gmail.com wrote: We were using zLinux to host TSM servers with TSM release 5.5 and were happy with performance and memory consumption. We backed-up 100s of servers a night using a z10 processor with multiple IFLs. Once we upgraded

Re: TSM server

Subject:TSM server Sent by:Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu

TSM server

We are in the process of bringing up a Tivoli Storage Manager [TSM] server using zLinux [SLES11] under zVM [6.2]. We are going to use the IBM7650G with XIV back end storage to provide Virtual Tape. The idea is to backup intel servers directly to tape then replicate to remote DR site. We have

TSM memory requirements

We currently have a z10 with 2 IFL's driving one LPAR running zVM and Linux images. The LPAR has 18GB of real storage and 6 GB of expanded storage assigned to it. We are wanting to run four images Linux with TSM as the application. In the TSM literature it states that we should have 12GB

Re: TSM memory requirements

Hi Ruddy, I am running TSM V6.1 on a z9 with 2 IFL's. The production TSM runs with a Vsize of 5GB. This one is moving a backup load of ~ 8TB a day and is rather maxed out. Most of the LPAR is running SAP and that takes up most of the real memory of 23GB with 1GB expanded. Another tip: do

Re: TSM memory requirements

and 6 GB of expanded storage assigned to it. We are wanting to run four images Linux with TSM as the application. In the TSM literature it states that we should have 12GB of real storage for each image. Is this virtual mamory or do we need 12 times 4 for 48 GB REAL memory to accomplish

Re: TSM memory requirements

I've got a TSM server running on Linux under z/VM for backing up internal test systems and it's happily running in 512 MB of Storage. If the disk and tape subsystems are fast enough you can make it pretty small and still be OK. It depends on your daily load. Mine is pretty light. -- Jay Brenneman

Re: TSM memory requirements

Caveat: My last TSM experience was with release 5.3, over a year and a half ago... Begin at, well, the beginning. The TSM server admin should be watching the buffer pool hit ratio, and expand (or contract) the database buffer pool size to achieve 98% (is that still the ROT?). Similar rules

Re: TSM memory requirements

We are wanting to run four images Linux with TSM as the application. In the TSM literature it states that we should have 12GB of real storage for each image. Is this virtual mamory or do we need 12 times 4 for 48 GB REAL memory to accomplish this scenerio? Has anyone tried this before

Using system z as a TSM server.

Anyone using TSM for zOS? I would like to know what the pros/cons/experiences are. Reply privately if you wish. Thank you, Bob Molerio     -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Re: Using system z as a TSM server.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:04 AM, bob molerio mole...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyone using TSM for zOS? I would like to know what the pros/cons/experiences are. That's pretty open question. I guess the main pro and con of TSM for z/OS is that it runs on z/OS... What do you compare with? You could

Re: Using system z as a TSM server.

Disclaimer. I do not use TSM on z/OS. However, in most of the discussions with compatriots I have had, the licensing cost for the z/OS version is a de-motivator and most have licensed TSM for AIX or Linux, and only use a client on z/OS. snip Subject: Using system z as a TSM server. Anyone using

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

Thanks to all that replied here and off the list... Lee Rob van der Heij wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alan Schilla (OET) alan.schi...@state.mn.us wrote: Interesting. Do you have any numbers on how much overhead? Is it 10% or 80%? I plan to use LACP too but my intent is more for high

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

phone: 651-201-1216 email: alan.schi...@state.mn.us -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Harder, Pieter Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 6:26 AM To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone? Hi John, We

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alan Schilla (OET) alan.schi...@state.mn.us wrote: Interesting. Do you have any numbers on how much overhead? Is it 10% or 80%? I plan to use LACP too but my intent is more for high availability that high bandwidth. If I dual path OSA's and Cisco 3750 switch

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

Hi Lee, Is anyone running a TSM server (not client) on Linux on Z? Any observations? Yes, we are. Using a DS8300 for disk storage, a TS3500/LTO3 for primary tape pools and a TS3310/LOT4 for copy pools and a 4x GbE LACP OSA bundle. It is a completely automated environment with the two tape

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Harder, Pieter Sent: 01 May 2009 10:50 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone? Hi Lee, Is anyone running a TSM server (not client) on Linux on Z? Any observations

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

Hi John, We are considering Linux on z9, and I noticed you mentioning the overhead of VSWITCH LACP - which we are planning to use. Do you have some detailed information on this overhead? Is it affected by SET PORT GROUP INTERVAL ? Any information would be gratefully received:-) The problem

TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

Hi... Is anyone running a TSM server (not client) on Linux on Z? Any observations? Thanks, Lee -- Lee Stewart, Senior SE Sirius Computer Solutions Phone: (303) 996-7122 Email: lee.stew...@siriuscom.com Web: www.siriuscom.com

Re: TSM Server on Linux on Z Anyone?

On 4/30/09 4:52 PM, Lee Stewart lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote: Hi... Is anyone running a TSM server (not client) on Linux on Z? Any observations? It works. If you have FCP-attached tape. It¹s still a CPU hog. It¹s useless with existing channel attached tape or silos

Re: Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

(formerly Hobbit). Yes, that's another way to do it. The down side of that approach is that you lose the centralized scheduling and result reporting that TSM already provides, and you have to come up with your own result management. You can specify the filesystems in the dsm.opt file if you know which ones

Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

Is there a single reference point that could guide me in establishing TSM Backups from a Linux client to TSM running under Z/os? I've been bouncing around between the TSM Reference manual, Install Guide and Admin Guide and am more confused than ever. I've got zero Linux experience so any help

Re: Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

It's exactly like setting it up on AIX or Solaris. The basic steps are: 1) Unpack and install the RPM for the TSM client using rpm -i. 2) cd to wherever it installed it (we usually put it in /opt/tsm or /opt/dsmclient) 3) cp dsm.opt.smp to dsm.opt 4) edit dsm.opt to set any values you need

Re: Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

Thanks David. My Z\os, Linux, Network person tells me steps 1-5 are done. As to step 6, that sounds like an individual user backing up his/her data. I'm looking to establish scheduled backups for a given Linux client from the TSM server on the Mainframe. Perhaps I should take this to IBM-Main

Re: Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

Have your TSM admin add the node to a schedule, then use dsmc sched to get the client to download the schedule from the TSM server. I don't remember whether Tivoli supplies init scripts or not, but if not, then you need to run that at boot time. On 1/5/09 3:42 PM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C

Re: Setting up TSM backups to a Mainframe Server

Or set it to run as root under CRON and you can specify the filesystem such as 'dsmc incremental / /srv /oradb'. You can also have the output processed into a status message to be sent to a central administrator or to XYMON (formerly Hobbit). /Tom Kern David Boyes wrote: Have your TSM admin

Using ESCON attached 3590 for TSM 5.5 / Linux

system with no problem, but apparently there is a 'special' device driver supplied for TSM 5.5 and when they install it, the driver apparently does not 'see' the tape device. They found a statement that TSM only supports Fiber attached tape devices, but we're not sure if Fiber in this context includes

Re: Using ESCON attached 3590 for TSM 5.5 / Linux

, but apparently there is a 'special' device driver supplied for TSM 5.5 and when they install it, the driver apparently does not 'see' the tape device. They found a statement that TSM only supports Fiber attached tape devices, but we're not sure if Fiber in this context includes ESCON or not and I can't see

Re: Using ESCON attached 3590 for TSM 5.5 / Linux

390 Port cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU Subject Re: [LINUX-390] Using ESCON attached 3590 for TSM

Re: Using ESCON attached 3590 for TSM 5.5 / Linux

the tape device. They found a statement that TSM only supports Fiber attached tape devices, but we're not sure if Fiber in this context includes ESCON or not It does not. TSM doesn't understand channel-attached tape on Linux at all. FCP-only. Your 3590 is useless for this purpose. Does

Re: Adabas and TSM

NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf Hi, Thank you to all for your responses. I will follow-up on ADINT as a possible solution. The problem with the flat file option is the additional

Re: Adabas and TSM

Not sure if this is the forum for this type of question, but was hoping that someone had experienced with this : ADSM-L (yes, the name still reflects the VM product origin of TSM, even if Tivoli doesn't remember) Does anyone have a way to backup ADABAS running on zLINUX to TSM? 1) Dump

Re: Adabas and TSM

I don't know of any commercial TSM agent for Adabas, but one might exist. Don't know for sure. It exists (existed?) for Windows when I was running AdabasD/SAPDB/MaxDB on Windows. It is called ADINT and was then marketed by IBM Germany. I am fairly sure there was a Unix version as well

Adabas and TSM

ADABAS running on zLINUX to TSM? We have a TSM agent installed on zLINUX, (TSM-version: 5.4.0) backing up to TSM server on Intel (version 5.3.4) Kind Regards, Vikesh -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions

Re: Adabas and TSM

I don't have ADABAS but I do have multiple Oracle servers that I backup with TSM. I do not use the TSM scheduler or CAD to manage the backup time. My customers require a known outage for backups, so I use a CRON job to stop the Oracle instance, run the DSMC Incremental backup and then start

Re: Bacula - Z/vm - 3590 - TSM

specialist in TP S.A. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Arro Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:05 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Bacula - Z/vm - 3590 - TSM Hi All, We ordered TSM for Z/VM and IBM tells us that it is no longer

Bacula - Z/vm - 3590 - TSM

Hi All, We ordered TSM for Z/VM and IBM tells us that it is no longer supported for Z/VM, So we're thinking of using Bacula under ZLinux to backup some distributed platforms. How does Bacula interface with 3590 Tape drives, Does it Talk via a Escon channel to the A60 Or Does it communicate

Re: Bacula - Z/vm - 3590 - TSM

We ordered TSM for Z/VM and IBM tells us that it is no longer supported for Z/VM, So we're thinking of using Bacula under ZLinux to backup some distributed platforms. How does Bacula interface with 3590 Tape drives, Does it Talk via a Escon channel to the A60 Yes. You need some help from

TSM vulnerabilities

vulnerabilities in the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) backup software client. The security holes could allow a buffer overrun attack or enable unauthorized access to stored data, IBM said. In the alert advisory issued late last week, IBM security researchers said that three client interfaces of TSM

Unsupported IBM Tools for TSM Journaling v5.3 Client

IBM had some tools for Journaling, like DBVIEW, FILEMON, etc. I would like to try them out. The only version I can find is for pre-5.3. Does anyone know where the current version is hiding out? Thanks, tom - - - - - - - - - - - - Toto, I have a feeling we're not in the mainframe world any

TSM on zLinux

Anyone running TSM on zLinux who is willing to contact me off-list and answer questions, please? Betsie Spann -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Installing TSM on 64-bit Linux on zSeries.

I opened a PMR with Tivoli on the installation problems. Here is the response: The README is incorrect regarding the installation steps when the 64 bit API is required. It is still required to have the 32 bit API installed when using the 32 bit B/A Client. Please uninstall the B/A Client,

Re: Installing TSM on 64-bit Linux on zSeries.

I'm not sure if this has been included in a fix pack yet, but another timesaver if you are receiving Aborted following dsmc with the 5.3 client is to download the following interim fix: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/ v5r3/Linux/LinuxzSeries/v532/. It

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Everybody, Thanks for all of the good information that you've provided. I've answered many questions and roughed out an early-phase architecture that I'll begin to set up. From what I've learned, it appears I'll have: SLE 9.0 TSM 5.3 and appropriate drivers. Some number of new fiber

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Don't blame STK. It won't work. TSM on Linux does not support non-SCSI tape at all. In fact these drives are using, for what I know, SCSI over FC and appear to the operating system as SCSI tape devices. And, it will work, we've done that, TSM does use TSM device drivers to access the tape

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Don't blame STK. It won't work. TSM on Linux does not support non-SCSI tape at all. In fact these drives are using, for what I know, SCSI over FC and appear to the operating system as SCSI tape devices. If you have FCP drives installed, then it will work, as you say. That's still pretty

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

, Unix, AS400 attaching their own drives with their preferred channel type. The key is not to confuse control path with data path. Various clients can talk to zOS via TCPIP while they talk to the drive via Fibre or SCSI. Running zLinux on a zOS managed library is not a problem. (zLinux/TSM would

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

, then the TSM code can't use the drives in the Powderhorn. Doesn't matter a whit if the guest can talk to the library manager, if it can't transfer data. It's important to keep in mind that sharing devices between open systems and mainframe systems is a relatively new thing, and the likelihood

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Thank you for clarifying your earlier post. My earlier point is that zLinux/TSM can certainly share libraries with zOS, but as you correctly point out, I would not suggest that Fibre or ESCON/FICON tape devices can be shared with zOS. However, its not well understood that libraries can indeed

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Has anybody done this? I'm trying to configure our STK 9310 powderhorn robotics to work with TSM running under Suse LE 9. If you've down this, I'd love to see some outline of where to start. STK support hasn't been too helpful with this venture. Don't blame STK. It won't work. TSM

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Gresham EDT was needed at TSM 5.2, TSM 5.3 supports access to STK libraries via ACSLS/Library with code built into TSM. We have tested shared ACSLS library support for lanfree backups on zLinux in the past with success by using a library manager server on AIX. We are using HSC on z/OS with Library

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Thanks for the info about TSM 5.3. I stand corrected. So many things to keep up with these days... Scott Ledbetter Sun Microsystems/StorageTek -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAYER Andreas Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:23 PM

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

An FYI, I was passed this link to the TSM website documenting the STK library suport: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Support ed_Devices_for_Linux.html#STK%20ACSLS Scott Ledbetter Sun/StorageTek -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL

z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

Has anybody done this? I'm trying to configure our STK 9310 powderhorn robotics to work with TSM running under Suse LE 9. If you've down this, I'd love to see some outline of where to start. STK support hasn't been too helpful with this venture. Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

I should have asked a further question. I assume you realize that TSM under z/Linux will only write to fibrechannel drives, not FICON or ESCON. If your 9310 is controlled by an open system running ACSLS, you are fine. If it is controlled by a z/OS system, you need an additonal piece of software

Re: z/Linux, TSM 5.3, and STK

To effectively use TSM on z/Linux with an STK 9310, you need an additional piece of software called Enterprise Distributape, sold/supported by Gresham Computing. Give them a call. http://www.gresham-computing.com/main.asp?page=148 Scott Ledbetter Sun Microsystems/StorageTek -Original

Re: TSM 64bit API install problem

-bit systems (I use that on my Slack/390x development machine). You could install all three of the RPMs that come in the tarball. Unless you're planning on actually writing software that calls TSM directly, I don't think you need the files that come with TIVsm-API64.s390.rpm. Mark Post

TSM 64bit API install problem

Anybody experience this and know how to get around it? 32bit install works ok. sdatztpf1:/tsm # rpm -i TIVsm-API64.s390.rpm Postinstall of the API IBM TSM Linux API installation complete. Be sure to set up the configuration files! sdatztpf1:/tsm # rpm -i TIVsm-BA.s390.rpm error: Failed

Re: TSM 64bit API install problem

(suse 2.6.5-7.193-s390x) and they work fine. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Rothman Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:51 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM 64bit API install problem Anybody experience this and know how to get

Re: TSM

Is anyone running TSM Server on zLinux? If so, are you having any issues? Other than the idiotic requirement for SCSI tape drives and the enormous CPU consumption of the client, no, it pretty much works as documented. What problems have you had

Re: TSM

Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU To LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: TSM Is anyone running TSM Server on zLinux? If so, are you having any issues? Other than the idiotic requirement for SCSI tape drives and the enormous CPU consumption of the client, no, it pretty much works

Re: TSM

Just curious, as we run the TSM server on zOS also, why you are considering moving it? Advantages, problems, etc.? Brad Brewer wrote: None, we are currently running it under z/OS, but were thinking of moving it to zLinux. Brad Brewer Humana Inc. Technical Services System Software (502)580

TSM

Is anyone running TSM Server on zLinux? If so, are you having any issues? Brad Brewer Humana Inc. Technical Services System Software (502)580-3086 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you

Re: TSM

I am currently running on a IBM Z800 processor with an IFL processor. The IFL processor has a SuSe Linux LPAR that has TSM running on it. I am not currently having an problems. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/10/2005 12:34:44 PM Is anyone running TSM Server on zLinux? If so, are you having any issues

Re: TSM

What are you using for backup media? -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Lovins Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 1:41 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM I am currently running on a IBM Z800 processor with an IFL processor

Re: TSM

I am using IBM 3590 B11 tape drives to backup the TSM database. I am using Hatachi 7700E disk to store the data from the server and workstations that I backup. The migration is using the IBM B11 tape drives. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/10/2005 12:42:07 PM What are you using for backup media

TSM 5.2.4 client on SLES9 64bit

I am trying to bring up a new SLES9 64bit server (no support contract at this time) and have gotten to the point of adding TSM client to it. I went to the IBM/Tivoli website and downloaded the latest TSM client for Linux on zSeries. The file is TSM524C_LINUX390.TAR. The instructions in the README

Re: TSM 5.2.4 client on SLES9 64bit

The message would indicate that you need to install API before API64. Thomas Kern wrote: I am trying to bring up a new SLES9 64bit server (no support contract at this time) and have gotten to the point of adding TSM client to it. I went to the IBM/Tivoli website and downloaded the latest TSM

Re: TSM 5.2.4 client on SLES9 64bit

I have since spoken with our TSM server administrator who told me to try the 5.3 client even though we run a 5.2 server. Again I got indications that for 64bit installation, you need API, API64 then BA. That installed fine, now for configuration and testing. /Tom Kern --- Rich Smrcina [EMAIL

TSM accounting file location

We are in the process of implementing a 5.2.2.0 TSM server running under zSeries Linux. We initially let the location of the accounting log default to the current directory for the dsmserv command. We are now trying to have the accounting log placed in /var/log. I added code to a copy

TSM server start-up under Linux

We have installed a TSM 5.2.2 server under Suse Enterprise Server 8 running on zSeries hardware. The TSM code includes a script named dsmserv.rc which accepts 'start' and 'stop' as arguments in the same way as scripts Suse supplies to control built-in services. The dsmserv.rc script does

Re: TSM server start-up under Linux

1) Report it as a bug to TSM support ASAP. This is a system integrity exposure, as the first time you install service or run insserv, you're likely to render your system unbootable when insserv rearranges all the symlinks in /etc/init.d and the dsmserv.rc script gets some completely bogus start

SLES9 and TSM Manager

Is anyone aware if TSM Manager for Linux is supported for SLES9 s390x? Or do I have to run SLES8? Regards, Darren -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

TSM/VM debate

Do we really need to beat this dead horse again? Tivoli's not interested in discussing it, and at this point, there's little to nothing we can do about the decision. Let's move on to creating a solution to the problem, not bemoaning past idiocy. Tivoli's generated plenty of enemies with their

Re: TSM for Linux on zSeries

11.06.2004 07:20:08 Alan Altmark wrote: On Thursday, 06/10/2004 at 01:24 MST, Wolfe, Gordon W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone worked with or know anything about Tivoli TSM 5.2 for zSeries Linux? Is it better than the VM version of TSM? Define better. It has better support than the VM

Re: TSM for Linux on zSeries

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 01:24:14PM -0700, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote: Has anyone worked with or know anything about Tivoli TSM 5.2 for zSeries Linux? Is it better than the VM version of TSM? It has more features, and it is compatible with the newer clients, but has many features that make

TSM for Linux on zSeries

Has anyone worked with or know anything about Tivoli TSM 5.2 for zSeries Linux? Is it better than the VM version of TSM? Does it work with ESCON-attached tape drives? Will it interface with VM:Tape and STK tape silos? I've been trying to get information off IBM's website on this but my browser

  1   2   >