Zhang, Rui wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 16:29 +0800, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:54:06 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Zhang, Rui wrote:
Hi, Hans,
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 16:00 +0800, Hans de Goede wrote:
I think all that is really needed and asked for is for the new
thermal
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 16:29 +0800, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:54:06 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Zhang, Rui wrote:
Hi, Hans,
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 16:00 +0800, Hans de Goede wrote:
I think all that is really needed and asked for is for the new
thermal
ACPI
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:54:06 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Zhang, Rui wrote:
Hi, Hans,
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 16:00 +0800, Hans de Goede wrote:
I think all that is really needed and asked for is for the new thermal
ACPI
code to:
1) provide temp readings in the same format as hwmon
Hi, all,
Sorry for the late response as I'm on the Chinese New Year vacation.
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:08 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:10:50PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
Why do you want to still export the temperature via ACPI sysfs paths
then?
Once it is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:10:50PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
Why do you want to still export the temperature via ACPI sysfs paths
then?
Once it is there and userspace progs make use of it, you will have
to
maintain it forever and HAL is getting crazy and must take care
about:
-
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for
evolving
and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are
differences in the way temperatures are reported out, we can go ahead
and
fix it.
That's fine, but
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:10:50PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
Why do you want to still export the temperature via ACPI sysfs paths
then?
Once it is there and userspace progs make use of it, you will have to
maintain it forever and HAL is getting crazy and must take care about:
- How to
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:53 +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
...
I absolutely don't have any issue with this. I feel that's the way to
go. Hwmon can roll out a patch which can report out temperature of
thermal sensors which are connected to EC and which follows ACPI spec.
Why do you want to still
Agreed. However, *duplicating* what is already in hwmon elsewhere is not
fun. Please reconsider.
I started off with the same position as you, Henrique,
but Rui and Sujith don't see it that way.
Of course this is software, we can always change it --
particularly since there will be a very
management sysfs class, and hwmon
Hi:
(btw: Please use an email client that doesn't completely butcher the
text to which you're replying. Thanks.)
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 10:26 +0800, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
And the two sysfs ABIs are incompatible. The ACPI one uses
Hi, henrique,
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 10:26 +0800, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
The new thermal managemeny sysfs class that was just merged into
acpi-test,
especially when dealing with temperature measurement and fan control,
has a
lot of common ground with the hwmon interface.
Yes,
Hi:
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 10:26 +0800, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
The new thermal managemeny sysfs class that was just merged into
acpi-test, especially when dealing with temperature measurement and
fan control, has a lot of common ground with the hwmon interface.
* Zhang Rui
12 matches
Mail list logo
