On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
I think the two options are either:
qcom-msm*, qcom-apq*, etc
or
qcom/msm-*, qcom/apq*, etc
I'm guessing we'll end up without the dir and in the future
On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/12/2013 7:05 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:47 PM, David Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
My original request to please use a
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
I think the two options are either:
qcom-msm*, qcom-apq*, etc
or
qcom/msm-*, qcom/apq*, etc
I'm guessing we'll end up without the dir and in the future have:
qcom/qcom-msm-*, qcom/qcom-apq-*
Olof???
When you
On 9/12/2013 7:05 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:47 PM, David Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
families stands. Please
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile| 4 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ = qcom}/msm8660-surf.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ =
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
Let's not move just one platform like this. If we are to do this, we
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
Let's not
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as
On 09/12/2013 01:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala
ga...@codeaurora.org
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
As Stephen W has pointed out previously, the dtb filename itself is or
may be an ABI and the bootloader may be hardcoded to a name. So we
should avoid future renames.
We still have the choice of producing the dtb files
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
As Stephen W has pointed out previously, the dtb filename itself is or
may be an ABI and the bootloader may be hardcoded to a name. So we
should avoid future
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have to, qcom-*
instead, since you guys can't seem to make
14 matches
Mail list logo
