Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf's message of 2010-04-18 11:01:41 +0200:
Ok Marije, Arnold, Philipp :)
programs don't depend to the development files, so I perceive that they
should be separated.
Today for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 = Ubuntu Hardy we do have a package jackd
including /usr/bin/jackd.
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 12:10 +0200, Stéphane LETZ wrote:
At Grame, we started working on JACK (jack1 at that time) in 2003 and our
first commitment was to port the C code base on OSX. Even if the result was
working, we rapidly felt that the C code base was not flexible enough to
evolve in
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until last year, but I fixed
everything and worked closely together with
Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf's message of 2010-04-18 11:01:41 +0200:
Ok Marije, Arnold, Philipp :)
programs don't depend to the development files, so I perceive that they
should be separated.
Today for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 = Ubuntu Hardy we do have a package jackd
Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until last year, but I fixed
everything and
Excerpts from Adrian Knoth's message of 2010-04-18 11:25:57 +0200:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until
Philipp wrote:
What was the topic again?
:D
I've sent what I guess the topic should be 3 minutes before you sent
your mail.
Again.
IMO the topic should be the free choice between JACK1 and JACK2. It's
unimportant if there is one package or if there are 5 packages for each
JACK. JACK3, DBUS
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
What was the topic again?
We're working on it.
it as in different jack implementations in Debian. Historically, we
only had jackd1, but I guess we'll at least see jackd1 and jackd2,
perhaps also tschack, and the user will be able to
Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
What was the topic again?
We're working on it.
it as in different jack implementations in Debian. Historically, we
only had jackd1, but I guess we'll at least see jackd1 and jackd2,
perhaps also
On Sunday 18 April 2010 00:14:31 Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from Arnold Krille's message of 2010-04-17 23:15:11 +0200:
...
That way your favourite
music player can have an output plugin that looks for jack and if that is
not running, looks for pulse and finally choose direct alsa for
On 19 April 2010 01:42, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
Hm, which distribution apart from gentoo do you know that has jacks libs and
server/apps in one package?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/jack/files/
We do not believe in the extra work of splitting package files for
Ray Rashif wrote:
On 19 April 2010 01:42, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
Hm, which distribution apart from gentoo do you know that has jacks libs and
server/apps in one package?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/jack/files/
We do not believe in the extra work
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 08:31 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
other. It seems that people have an opinion about something, but only
share this
On 19 April 2010 02:57, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
An seemingly outdated information said pacman -S jack will make JACK2
available too. A quick web search doesn't say if there are JACK1 and 2
available for Arch. Is this the distro that already makes the choice
available?
Ray Rashif wrote:
On 19 April 2010 02:57, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
An seemingly outdated information said pacman -S jack will make JACK2
available too. A quick web search doesn't say if there are JACK1 and 2
available for Arch. Is this the distro that already makes
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:21:06PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 08:31 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
other. It
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about.
JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not planned as a successor of Jack1.
17 matches
Mail list logo
