On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 01:47:39 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, I started to investigate myself - I think this is caused
> > > by "tools/session_exchange.py"
> > this is broken for ardour3 (some interested person could fix it and t
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > Sorry, I started to investigate myself - I think this is caused
> > by "tools/session_exchange.py"
> this is broken for ardour3 (some interested person could fix it and then
> get into the whole SeX (Session Exchange) idea.
I thought
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:32 PM, R. Mattes wrote:
> Sorry, I started to investigate myself - I think this is caused
> by "tools/session_exchange.py"
this is broken for ardour3 (some interested person could fix it and then
get into the whole SeX (Session Exchange) idea.
there is also tools/synth
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:06:06 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:57:25PM +0100, R. Mattes wrote:
>
> > Could someone with deeper insight in the ardour3 package enlighten me:
> > why on earth does ardour3 depend on python-gtk2 and (!sic) python-twisted?
> >
> > Python-twisted is an
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:57:25PM +0100, R. Mattes wrote:
> Could someone with deeper insight in the ardour3 package enlighten me:
> why on earth does ardour3 depend on python-gtk2 and (!sic) python-twisted?
>
> Python-twisted is an application framework for internet/event-based
> applications.
Could someone with deeper insight in the ardour3 package enlighten me:
why on earth does ardour3 depend on python-gtk2 and (!sic) python-twisted?
Python-twisted is an application framework for internet/event-based
applications. Why does ardour3 pull in such a monster framework?
TIA Ralf Mattes
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Dominique Michel wrote:
> I know these papers, they are just a part of the story. Evans and other
> scientists refuted them all. We can find them in the rebuttals section
> of http://www.atomicprecision.com/Community/content.html
>
Several of which rebuttals have
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 00:22 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Dominique Michel wrote:
>
> > ... mainstream physics doesn't validate Evans' theory (as it
> > didn't validated Galileo's theory at his time)
>
> That is one of the most intellectually dishonest
