Re: [LAD] Hi, I'm new

Welcome to the community, Guy. Congrats on your first audio plugin. My IRC handle is andrewrk. I've been working on Genesis DAW: http://genesisdaw.org/ See you around! On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:09 AM Guy Sherman wrote: > Hi all, > > I just found this list after being

[LAD] JACK latency compensation on USB audio devices

I've run across a phenomena that puzzles me. It appears that each time I start the jack server on an usb card, jack_iodelay will report a different "extra loopback latency". I've seen this phenomena on a behringer x32, and just verified it on a rme babyface. For instance with jack1 at 64/2 on

Re: [LAD] JACK latency compensation on USB audio devices

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:17:43 +0200 Luis Garrido wrote: > On 02/09/15 21:04, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > > > Maybe not a huge problem and I suppose I'll set the latency > > compensation somewhere in the middle of the results, but still I'm > > curious of the mechanism behind this

Re: [LAD] Hi, I'm new

Hi Gerald, My IRC handle is dynamicsamurai. Looking forward to your thoughts! Cheers, Guy. On 02/09/15 19:43, Gerald wrote: Hi Guy, thanks for sharing this and welcome here. Whats' your IRC handle? I'm asking since I'm also very slowly teaching myself audio DSP. DISTHRO Framework was the

Re: [LAD] JACK latency compensation on USB audio devices

On 02/09/15 21:04, Joakim Hernberg wrote: Maybe not a huge problem and I suppose I'll set the latency compensation somewhere in the middle of the results, but still I'm curious of the mechanism behind this phenomena. USB devices add some extra buffering, check out this thread:

Re: [LAD] Hi, I'm new

Thanks! Looks like you've undertaken quite an ambitious project, nice one! On 02/09/15 20:27, Andrew Kelley wrote: Welcome to the community, Guy. Congrats on your first audio plugin. My IRC handle is andrewrk. I've been working on Genesis DAW: http://genesisdaw.org/ See you around! On Tue,

Re: [LAD] JACK latency compensation on USB audio devices

On 09/02/15 21:35, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I > wanted to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack server > is invoked, it will need a different amount of latency compensation > even when no other parameters have changed.