Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-02 Thread Jon Smirl
On 10/2/07, Dominic Sacré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/2/07, Tosif Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes...thts exactly wat my question is, a wrt box which can play songs but > > since it doesn't have speakers i want to use cat5 as the transport media. > > Does your WRT have USB ports? The

Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-02 Thread Dominic Sacré
On 10/2/07, Tosif Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes...thts exactly wat my question is, a wrt box which can play songs but > since it doesn't have speakers i want to use cat5 as the transport media. Does your WRT have USB ports? The usb-audio driver has been ported to OpenWRT, so you could use

Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-02 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 01:02 +0530, Tosif Ahmed wrote: > > As far as I got it the task/question was to use the Cat5-cables for > analog > > music-signals (which is not a problem) and have a digital (modified > or > > unmodified) WRT-router route the music to different ports or to > produce the > >

Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-02 Thread Tosif Ahmed
> As far as I got it the task/question was to use the Cat5-cables for analog > music-signals (which is not a problem) and have a digital (modified or > unmodified) WRT-router route the music to different ports or to produce the > audio-signals on its ethernet-ports (which is a problem, i.e. not pos

Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-01 Thread torbenh
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: > Am Montag, 1. Oktober 2007 schrieb Doug Helbling: > > Regarding this whole audio over Cat5 thread, do we actually understand what > > the objective is of this exercise / project? Is the original authors use > > of terminology such th

Re: [LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-01 Thread Arnold Krille
Am Montag, 1. Oktober 2007 schrieb Doug Helbling: > Regarding this whole audio over Cat5 thread, do we actually understand what > the objective is of this exercise / project? Is the original authors use > of terminology such that we know what is actually supposed to be achieved? > Sorry, I digres

[LAD] Re: Audio over Cat5

2007-10-01 Thread Doug Helbling
Regarding this whole audio over Cat5 thread, do we actually understand what the objective is of this exercise / project? Is the original authors use of terminology such that we know what is actually supposed to be achieved? When I first read this, I thought the idea was to produce some sort of