On 5/16/2018 11:35 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:36:14AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
1. if bio_full is true that means no space in bio->bio_io_vec[] no?
Than how come we are still proceeding ahead with only warning?
While originally in bio_add_page we used to ret
On 5/9/2018 1:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
For the upcoming removal of buffer heads in XFS we need to keep track of
the number of outstanding writeback requests per page. For this we need
to know if bio_add_page merged a region with the previous bvec or not.
Instead of adding additional arg
On 8/11/2017 8:30 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2017 11:15 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Jens,
Could you please take a look at below patch and the issue it is trying
to solve. Please let us know your thoughts on the below problem and the
patch.
It looks reasonable to me. I'll queue
Hi Jens,
Could you please take a look at below patch and the issue it is trying
to solve. Please let us know your thoughts on the below problem and the
patch.
Regards
Ritesh
On 8/9/2017 6:28 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
In below scenario blkio cgroup does not work as per their assigned
pid=691: Thu Jan 1 00:06:08 1970
write: IOPS=1043, BW=32.6MiB/s (34.2MB/s)(1024MiB/31401msec)
<..>
// In this processes BW is as per their respective cgroups weight.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi
Hi Linus,
Thanks for getting back on this.
On 12/27/2016 5:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
I may have some silly queries here. Please bear with my little understanding
on blk-mq.
It's OK we need to build consensus.
On 12/20/2016 7:
Hi,
I may have some silly queries here. Please bear with my little
understanding on blk-mq.
On 12/20/2016 7:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
HACK ALERT: DO NOT MERGE THIS! IT IS A FYI PATCH FOR DISCUSSION
ONLY.
This hack switches the MMC/SD subsystem from using the legacy blk
layer to using blk-m
On 12/16/2016 3:57 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/16/2016 05:41 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani
---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 286b2a2..8369564 100644
--- a/include
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani
---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 286b2a2..8369564 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ enum blk_queue_state {
struct
Minor comments.
On 12/9/2016 1:43 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
Takes a list of requests, and dispatches it. Moves any residual
requests to the dispatch list.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
block/blk-mq.c | 85 --
block/blk-mq.h | 1 +
2 files c
On 12/1/2016 9:08 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/01/2016 03:27 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Factor out common code for setting REQ_NOMERGE
flag which is being used out at certain places
and make it a helper instead (req_set_nomerge).
I applied this, but I got rid of the inline. Let the compiler
Factor out common code for setting REQ_NOMERGE
flag which is being used out at certain places
and make it a helper instead (req_set_nomerge).
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani
---
block/blk-merge.c | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk
12 matches
Mail list logo
