I can't mount RAID-1 btrfs after reboot (well, sort of).
Using 2.6.31-rc5 and btrfs-progs 0.19, I created a RAID-1 fileystem
using these command line options:
# mkfs.btrfs -L btrfs-data -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
After which I was able to mount the filesystem with either of the
On Fri, Aug 14 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I can't mount RAID-1 btrfs after reboot (well, sort of).
Using 2.6.31-rc5 and btrfs-progs 0.19, I created a RAID-1 fileystem
using these command line options:
# mkfs.btrfs -L btrfs-data -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
After which I
There is good chance that the BTRFS kmemleak reports using 2.6.31-rc6
[1] are false-positives, due to the overwriting of the static pointers
[2]. Does this ring true with anyone else?
--- [1]
unreferenced object 0x88001eda7000 (size 168):
comm rm, pid 14794, jiffies 4301710929
backtrace:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:03:04PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
There is good chance that the BTRFS kmemleak reports using 2.6.31-rc6
[1] are false-positives, due to the overwriting of the static pointers
[2]. Does this ring true with anyone else?
If these were real leaks you'd see errors
Daniel J Blueman daniel.blue...@gmail.com wrote:
There is good chance that the BTRFS kmemleak reports using 2.6.31-rc6
[1] are false-positives, due to the overwriting of the static pointers
[2]. Does this ring true with anyone else?
If you do a few echo scan /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak, do
I created a shiny new 10G btrfs filesystem on a 2.6.31-rc5 (x86-64
running as Xen domU), and tried cloning a fresh copy of linux-2.6 onto it:
[jer...@f11-64 git]$ git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Initialized empty Git repository in
