What a strange coincidence that it affected git pack files in both cases.
It's almost too improbable...
Probably more than a coincidence I think, the question is what though...
Some SSD drives (or rather the cheap wear levelling controllers in things
like USB sticks) have firmware which tri
Hello. I am reporting possible bugs caused
by the absence of memory barriers.
Please examine this issue and let me know your opinion.
In add_async_extent(), an async_extent object is allocated and initialized
and then links to &cow->extents.
However, since there is no memory barrier
between the
This is vastly different from the original patch. Now instead of checking for
enough space when starting each transaction, we simply do a
btrfs_reserve_metadata_space() and specify how many items we plan on modifying.
Then once we've done our modifications and such, just call
btrfs_unreserve_metad
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Which cases do set_page_dirty happen without page_mkwrite? For fsx-linux
> > > I hope there shouldn't be
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Which cases do set_page_dirty happen without page_mkwrite? For fsx-linux
> > I hope there shouldn't be any...
>
> I've been assuming its the zap_pte_range part, but now I
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:49AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > > in
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:49AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
>
> This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion p
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:37:42AM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=57516
> >
> > The issue is pretty much moot at this point, since OCZ support were not
> > really interested in providing any sort of real technical support to
> > fin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, M
On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> > > > On Mon,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Tracy Reed wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:11PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf spake thusly:
>> I've already deleted the file in question unfortunately.
>> On IRC Chris decided that either bad RAM or a harddrive error was the
>> most likely reason for this chechsu
On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:01:41AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > On Tu
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:01:41AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
On Wed, Sep 09 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > Just
16 matches
Mail list logo