Hi,
Attached is the patch for the xfstests, which adds snapshot,
defragment and volume management test cases for the btrfs
(257, 258 and 259 respectively).
This introduces a new user variable 'DISK_POOL' which should
be set to disks for the raid tests.
An example of usage of these tests
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:46:01 -0400
Adam Newby ane...@ceradyne.com wrote:
Hello all,
I recently had a power failure and can no longer mount my /home directory.
The harddrive has two BTRFS partitions: sda7(/) and sda8(/home). The /
partition loads up just fine, but /home does not. I've tried
sync_pending is uninitialized before it be used, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 3c5f2fc..918adf6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
Updated the wiki accordingly
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Leonidas,
Du meintest am 04.08.11:
Another thing is that there are commands for creating the build
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 04.08.11:
What are the symptoms of not having the device node? (i.e. how
would I diagnose this particular problem?)
If I remember correct: mounting works, writing works, reading works.
And adding another partition works.
But there are strange messages when I
Btrfs subtracted the size of the allocated space twice when it allocated
the space from the bitmap in the cluster, it broke the free space information
and led to oops finally.
And this patch also fixes the bug that ctl-free_space was subtracted
without lock.
Reported-by: Liu Bo
On 02.08.2011 18:01, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On 02.08.2011 17:21, Chris Mason wrote:
But, I'll toss in an alternative. Adapt the git pack files a little and
use them as the format. There are a few reasons for this:
Git has a very strong developer community and is already being
hammered into use
Hi Anand,
Can you please post the patch in the body of the message so we can
comment on it inline.
Aditya is also working on a btrfs snapshots xfstest (currently named
257) as part of
his Google summer of code project.
It would be great if you guys can cooperate your efforts.
BTW, while
We don't use the defrag struct on this path.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter erro...@gmail.com
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 658d669..1102059 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ int btrfs_add_inode_defrag(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Amir Goldstein amir7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anand,
Can you please post the patch in the body of the message so we can
comment on it inline.
Aditya is also working on a btrfs snapshots xfstest (currently named
257) as part of
his Google summer of code
Right now in create_snapshot(), we'll BUG() if btrfs_lookup_dentry() returns
a NULL inode (negative dentry). Getting a negative dentry here probably
isn't ever expected to happen however two things lead me to believe that we
should trap this anyway:
- I don't see any possiblity of serious fs
This is called from only one place - create_subvol() which passes errors
safely back out to it's caller, btrfs_mksubvol where they are handled.
Additionally, btrfs_create_subvol_root() itself bug's needlessly from error
return of btrfs_update_inode(). Since create_subvol() was fixed to catch
Hugo Mills hugo at carfax.org.uk writes:
It includes the latest scrub patches, the compile fixes for gcc
4.6, and a selection of other, smaller features. Go forth and play.
Thx Hugo, I hit this error while trying to compile:
# make dir-test
ls dir-test.c
dir-test.c
gcc
13 matches
Mail list logo
