If this is a deliberate corruption can you pls share the test-case ?
if not have you tried mount with recovery and the scrub. ? scrub
would be preferred choice over btrfsck.
On 10/07/12 19:08, haveanice...@cv-sv.de wrote:
This code should detect the problem without SIGSEGV but a
Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com hat am 11. Juli 2012 um 09:13 geschrieben:
If this is a deliberate corruption can you pls share the test-case ?
No. It's a real life corruption on a file system used to back up some servers.
That's also why basics like aquota,awk etc. are found.
But I
Messaggio originale
Da: a...@arndnet.de
Data: 10/07/2012 22.09
A: kreij...@inwind.it
Cc: Goffredo Baroncellikreij...@libero.it, Christian Robertchristian.
rob...@polymtl.ca, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Ogg: Re: 3.5.0-rc6: btrfs and LVM snapshots -gt; wrong devicename in
/proc/mounts
Hi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:57:55PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:58 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:27:59AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not
perform well enough.
Here is a scenario in fio jobs:
On 07/11/2012 08:31 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:57:55PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:58 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:27:59AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not
perform well
Hi Josef,
I hit a warning with this patch on top of the current cmason/for-linus
branch. Takes about 15 minutes to produce when running xfstest 278 in
a loop and, in another shell, doing fsstress on the same volume to
force metadata modifications.
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
...
5032 } else
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:27:59AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not
perform well enough.
Here is a scenario in fio jobs:
We have 4 threads, t1 t2 t3 t4, starting to buffer read a same file,
and all of them will race on
Skylar Burtenshaw daninfuchs at gmail.com writes:
Chris Mason chris.mason at oracle.com writes:
Which kernel was used during the power outage?
The kernel in use was 2.6.38 or so. Didn't write that down, but I'm fairly
certain it was .38 or .37 - sorry I can't be more precise.
Here's
On 07/12/2012 01:21 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:27:59AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not
perform well enough.
Here is a scenario in fio jobs:
We have 4 threads, t1 t2 t3 t4, starting to buffer read a same
On 2012/7/11 3:29, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:21:07PM -0600, Li Zefan wrote:
Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type,
which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)-free_space pointer.
This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes
While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not
perform well enough.
Here is a scenario in fio jobs:
We have 4 threads, t1 t2 t3 t4, starting to buffer read a same file,
and all of them will race on add_to_page_cache_lru(), and if one thread
successfully puts its page
While spinning up a nice new laptop, I needed to stage my Gentoo
install through Ubuntu so I could use EFI. The problem with this is
that my newly created and mounted btrfs was crashed multiple times
because Ubuntu wanted to be awful and unstable.
This isn't a complaint about Ubuntu, it knows
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, eric gisse jowr...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, phoronix showed there is a --repair option. After enabling
snapshotting and playing around with the various discussed options, I
discovered that --repair and no special mount options was sufficient
to get the
13 matches
Mail list logo
