btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hello, btrfs-mailing-list, I already tried to contact Chris Mason via pm but so far I didn't get a reply so I taking this approach now: I am a happy btrfs-user with gentoo linux for some time now and noticed that the command mount does not show me which subvolid is mounted where. eg. # mount

Fwd: btrfs Wiki account request

2014-07-08 Thread Sjon Hortensius
I wrote a simple alternative for a script that is currently on the btrfs wiki (for showing quotas) in bash instead of Python. I have attempted to add this to the page but after entering the captcha 15 times my account was rejected because of a missing bio. Maybe someone can add this to

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 21:07:30 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I am a happy btrfs-user with gentoo linux for some time now and noticed that the command mount does not show me which subvolid is mounted where. Interestingly I just found that this came up in Fedora some time ago:

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Chris Murphy
On Jul 8, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Can you tell me where the problem/solution might be located? Is it a known behavior in a way … ? It's known. Ubuntu has a patch so that mount shows subvolume names. This information is probably available on Gentoo with

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: ignore orphaned qgroups by default

2014-07-08 Thread Mark Fasheh
qgroup items are not deleted by btrfs when the underlying subvolume goes away. As a result, btrfsck will print those as inconsistent. This can clutter up the printout so we ignore them by default. They are still printed if a full report (via --qgroup-report) is requested. This patch and the ones

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 08.07.2014 22:20, schrieb Chris Murphy: On Jul 8, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Can you tell me where the problem/solution might be located? Is it a known behavior in a way … ? It's known. Ubuntu has a patch so that mount shows subvolume names. This

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 08.07.2014 22:19, schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 21:07:30 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I am a happy btrfs-user with gentoo linux for some time now and noticed that the command mount does not show me which subvolid is mounted where. Interestingly I just found that

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Chris Murphy
On Jul 8, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 08.07.2014 22:20, schrieb Chris Murphy: On Jul 8, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Can you tell me where the problem/solution might be located? Is it a known behavior in a way … ?

[PATCH] Btrfs: use BUG_ON

2014-07-08 Thread Himangi Saraogi
Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG(); The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows: // smpl @@ identifier x; @@ -if (x) BUG(); +BUG_ON(x); // /smpl Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi himangi...@gmail.com Acked-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++-- 1

Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux

2014-07-08 Thread Qu Wenruo
Original Message Subject: Re: btrfs and mount in gentoo linux From: Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Date: 2014年07月09日 04:52 Am 08.07.2014 22:19, schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 21:07:30 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I