On 10/30/2015 07:41 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
在 2015年10月30日 16:32, Anand Jain 写道:
Qu,
We shouldn't mark FS readonly when chunks are degradable.
As below.
Thanks, Anand
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 39a2d57..dbb2483 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btr
On 30/10/2015 16:25, Alex Adriaanse wrote:
I have an EC2 instance on AWS that tends to freeze several times per
week. When it freezes it stops responding to network traffic, disk
I/O stops, and CPU goes to 100%. The system comes back fine after a
reboot. I was finally able to get a kernel backtr
I have an EC2 instance on AWS that tends to freeze several times per week. When
it freezes it stops responding to network traffic, disk I/O stops, and CPU goes
to 100%. The system comes back fine after a reboot. I was finally able to get a
kernel backtrace from when this happened today, which I
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:33:01PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> So the preliminary support is merged. Outstanding issues are all related
> to blkid API:
>
> - is_ssd
Fixed by trivially ifdef around the function.
> - btrfs_wipe_existing_sb
> - check_overwrite
>
> In the ssd check case it's safe t
On 2015-10-30 06:58, Duncan wrote:
Lukas Pirl posted on Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:43:41 +1300 as excerpted:
If there is one subvolume that contains all other (read only) snapshots
and there is insufficient storage to copy them all separately:
Is there an elegant way to preserve those when moving the
On 10/28/2015 04:10 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Currently, the code reserves/releases extents in multiples of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
units. Fix this by doing reservation/releases in block size units.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik
Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from thi
On 10/28/2015 04:10 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
The direct I/O read's endio and corresponding repair functions work on
page sized blocks. This commit adds the ability for direct I/O read to work on
subpagesized blocks.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik
Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 10/28/2015 04:10 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Checksums are applicable to sectorsize units. The current code uses
bio->bv_len units to compute and look up checksums. This works on machines
where sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE. This patch makes the checksum computation and
look up code to work with sec
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:31:47PM +0800, Zhao Lei wrote:
> comparer_set, which was allocated by malloc(), should be free before
> function return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei
> ---
> cmds-qgroup.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds-qgroup.c b/cmds-
在 2015年10月30日 16:32, Anand Jain 写道:
Qu,
We shouldn't mark FS readonly when chunks are degradable.
As below.
Thanks, Anand
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 39a2d57..dbb2483 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ static i
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:58:47AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Lukas Pirl posted on Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:43:41 +1300 as excerpted:
>
> > If there is one subvolume that contains all other (read only) snapshots
> > and there is insufficient storage to copy them all separately:
> > Is there an elegant way
On 2015-10-30 05:45, Marcel Ritter wrote:
Hi btrfs-developers,
I just read about the possible/planned merge of richacl patches into
linux kernel 4.4.
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661078/
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661357/
Will btrfs support richacls with kernel 4.4?
According to the btrfs wiki,
Lukas Pirl posted on Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:43:41 +1300 as excerpted:
> If there is one subvolume that contains all other (read only) snapshots
> and there is insufficient storage to copy them all separately:
> Is there an elegant way to preserve those when moving the data across
> disks?
AFAIK, no
Woops, just noticed I copied and pasted a typo there. Sorry for the
trouble. It should be:
Tested-by: Johannes Henninger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/m
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:43:28AM +0800, Tom Yan wrote:
> So I noticed that SSD detection does work on unpartitioned devices in
> mkfs.btrfs somehow:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102921
>
> Later I found out that it breaks at blkid_devno_to_wholedisk() in is_ssd():
> http://git.k
Hi btrfs-developers,
I just read about the possible/planned merge of richacl patches into
linux kernel 4.4.
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661078/
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661357/
Will btrfs support richacls with kernel 4.4?
According to the btrfs wiki, this topic has not been claimed:
https://b
Hi btrfs-developers,
I just read about the possible/planned merge of richacl patches into
linux kernel 4.4.
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661078/
s. http://lwn.net/Articles/661357/
Will btrfs support richacls with kernel 4.4?
According to
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Lukas Pirl posted on Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:43:41 +1300 as excerpted:
> Is e.g. "balance" also influenced by the userspace tools or does
> the kernel the actual work?
btrfs balance is done "online", that is, on the (writable-)mounted
filesystem, and the kernel does the real work. It's the tools th
Marc Joliet posted on Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:10:24 +0100 as excerpted:
>>Meanwhile, as explained in the systemd docs (specifically the systemd
>>for administrators series, IIRC), systemd dropping back to the initr* is
>>actually its way of automatically doing effectively the same thing we
>>were usin
Filipe Manana writes:
> Try this (just sent a few minutes ago):
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7463161/
I've been using this patch for a week now, doing two rebalances a day
(one per file system) - no problem so far. Thanks!
Probably unrelated to this I did experience one reboot without an
Qu,
We shouldn't mark FS readonly when chunks are degradable.
As below.
Thanks, Anand
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 39a2d57..dbb2483 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ static int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root
*r
21 matches
Mail list logo