Re: Question: raid1 behaviour on failure

Am 18.04.2016 um 09:22 schrieb Qu Wenruo: > BTW, it would be better to post the dmesg for better debug. So here we. I did the same test again. Here is a full log of what i did. It seems to be mean like a bug in btrfs. Sequenz of events: 1. mount the raid1 (2 disc with different size) 2. unplug

Re: [PATCH v8 00/27][For 4.7] Btrfs: Add inband (write time) de-duplication framework

Hi David, Any new comment about the ondisk format and ioctl interface? Thanks, Qu Qu Wenruo wrote on 2016/04/05 11:08 +0800: David Sterba wrote on 2016/04/04 18:55 +0200: On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: Please use the newly added BTRFS_PERSISTENT_ITEM_KEY

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Test that qgroup counts are valid after snapshot creation

On 2016/04/20 7:25, Mark Fasheh wrote: This has been broken since Linux v4.1. We may have worked out a solution on the btrfs list but in the meantime sending a test to expose the issue seems like a good idea. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- tests/btrfs/122 | 88

[PATCH] btrfs: Test that qgroup counts are valid after snapshot creation

This has been broken since Linux v4.1. We may have worked out a solution on the btrfs list but in the meantime sending a test to expose the issue seems like a good idea. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- tests/btrfs/122 | 88

Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 05:08:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Current btrfs qgroup design implies a requirement that after calling > btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() there must be a commit root switch. > > Normally this is OK, as btrfs_qgroup_accounting_extents() is only called > inside

Re: Infinite loop/hang in in btrfs_find_space_cluster()

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote: > Hello all, > > We just got this backtrace in 4.4.6 on an ARM AM335x (beaglebone > compatible). The trace looks similar to this one: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/54734 We solved the problem so I thought I would report

Re: Install to or Recover RAID Array Subvolume Root?

On 19 April 2016 at 07:14, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > The closest I've ever seen for Debian to a Gentoo stage3 installation (the > developers discourage usage of stage2 installs these days unless you're > bootstrapping _everything_ yourself) is debbootstrap, and I could

Клиентские базы тел +79133913837 Skype: prodawez389 Email: ammanakuw-7...@yopmail.com

Соберем для Вас по интернет базу данных потенциальных клиентов для Вашего Бизнеса. По базе можно звонить, писать, слать факсы и email, вести любые прямые активные продажи Ваших товаров и услуг Узнайте подробнее по тел +79133913837 (whatsapp,viber,telegram) Skype: prodawez389 Email:

Re: Install to or Recover RAID Array Subvolume Root?

On 18 April 2016 at 23:06, David Alcorn wrote: > Nicolas: > > My flash drive uses BTRFS and I am comfortable with your instructions > with one exception. What does "update /etc/default/grub" mean? > > Currently, I am waiting for a scrub to verify that all is in good > order

Re: btrfs-image and btrfs send related queries

> I have /dev/sdb , /dev/sdc. Using wipefs -fa I cleared both devices and > created btrfs on /dev/sdb. Mounted and written some files and unmounted it. > > Then I ran btrfs-image /dev/sdc /img1.img and got the dump. It looks like you imaged the wrong device, that might clarify the IO errors later

Re: Install to or Recover RAID Array Subvolume Root?

On 2016-04-18 16:34, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: On 18 April 2016 at 11:52, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2016-04-18 11:39, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: Like I said in one of my earlier e-mails

Re: RAID5 Unable to remove Failing HD

Hi, Le 19/04/2016 11:13, Anand Jain a écrit : > >>> # btrfs device delete 3 /mnt/store/ >>> ERROR: device delete by id failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device >>> >>> Were the patch sets above for btrfs-progs or for the kernel ? >> [...] > > By the way, For Lionel issue, delete missing should

Re: RAID5 Unable to remove Failing HD

Anand Jain posted on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:13:04 +0800 as excerpted: >>> # btrfs device delete 3 /mnt/store/ >>> ERROR: device delete by id failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device >>> >>> Were the patch sets above for btrfs-progs or for the kernel ? >> >> Looks like you're primarily interested in

Re: btrfs-image and btrfs send related queries

Henk Slager gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Roman Mamedov romanrm.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:13:28 +0200 > > Henk Slager gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> (your email keeps ending up in gmail spam folder) > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:24 AM, sri

Re: RAID5 Unable to remove Failing HD

# btrfs device delete 3 /mnt/store/ ERROR: device delete by id failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Were the patch sets above for btrfs-progs or for the kernel ? Looks like you're primarily interested in the concern2 patches, device delete by devid. A quick search of the list back-history

Re: [resend] btrfs-send -c fails: reproduction case

Zachary Vance posted on Sun, 17 Apr 2016 18:46:13 -0700 as excerpted: > I was already making sure all -c references were both present and > unmodified, I think the confusion is mostly around whether the parent > required to use -c, and whether it's an implicit reference volume in > particular. If

Re: Kernel crash if both devices in raid1 are failing

Dmitry Katsubo posted on Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:45:40 +0200 as excerpted: > Actually btrfs restore has recovered many files, however I was not able > to run in fully unattended mode as it complains about "looping a lot". > Does it mean that files are corrupted / not correctly restored? As long as

Re: RAID5 Unable to remove Failing HD

Lionel Bouton posted on Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:59:35 +0200 as excerpted: > Hi, > > Le 10/02/2016 10:00, Anand Jain a écrit : >> >> Thanks for the report. Fixes are in the following patch sets >> >> concern1: >> Btrfs to fail/offline a device for write/flush error: >>[PATCH 00/15] btrfs: Hot